Dark Reading is part of the Informa Tech Division of Informa PLC

This site is operated by a business or businesses owned by Informa PLC and all copyright resides with them.Informa PLC's registered office is 5 Howick Place, London SW1P 1WG. Registered in England and Wales. Number 8860726.

Risk

5/31/2007
07:45 AM
Connect Directly
Google+
Twitter
RSS
E-Mail
50%
50%

Beware of the Quiet Ones

Vulnerability report for '06 shows XSS still number one, but lesser-known bugs making inroads

Cross-site scripting (XSS) may be the poster child for what's wrong with Web security, but an updated vulnerability report from Mitre suggests that two lesser-known attack vectors are quietly growing as well.

Mitre has quietly released the final version of its 2006 Common Vulnerabilities and Exposures (CVE) report, which it previewed last fall. As the company reported previously, XSS was the number one vulnerability for 2006, usurping SQL injection for the first time.

But there are also a couple of surprises in the updated report. For example, PHP Remote File Inclusion (a.k.a. PHP RFI, or php-include) jumped from a number four ranking to number three for the year. PHP RFI vulnerabilities in 2006 increased 1,000 percent from the previous year, and they now account for 13.1 percent of all reported flaws. This puts PHP RFI just behind the better-known SQL injection (13.6 percent). (See Cross-Site Scripting: Attackers' New Favorite Flaw.)

The updated report also flags cross-site request forgery (CSRF) as a vulnerability to watch, even though it accounts for less than .1 percent of bugs reported. "There is a real disconnect here between what Web app security researchers are finding on the professional auditing side versus what's being publicly recorded in the CVE," says Steven Christey, principal information security engineer for Mitre. "Researchers who publicly disclose [vulnerabilities] just aren't looking for [CSRF bugs]."

But Christey says that doesn't mean Web developers and operators should ignore CSRF. Like other researchers, he calls CSRF a "sleeping giant" that may be more prevalent than reported. "It's a little more complex than most kinds of vulnerabilities," he says. "And its implications might not immediately be as obvious to someone who discovers it." (See Killer Combo: XSS + CSRF and CSRF Vulnerability: A 'Sleeping Giant'.)

Kris Kendall, principal consultant for Mandiant, says although his company regularly finds CSRF bugs in penetration tests, he rarely sees actual attacks. Still, it's a potentially dangerous attack vector for stealthy, targeted attacks. "CSRF has a larger impact for the victim than a typical XSS attack," he says. "And mitigation is tricky -- it's hard to fix."

PHP, on the other hand, is low-hanging fruit for attackers. Kendall says an attacker can basically Google to find Websites vulnerable to the PHP RFC bug. PHP lets an attacker take over a machine, and some researchers say it's becoming popular among botnet herders who use it for command and control functions.

"I would think these vulnerabilities would not so much be used to add new bots, but to help Botherders manage their existing bots... adding new command and control nodes," Kendall says.

The best way to protect against an attack is to disable the "registered globals" feature in PHP, Kendall says. But not all organizations do this, he notes.

"RFI is extremely powerful and easy to use, so it's no surprise it's attractive to attackers," says Mitre's Christey. And many Web hosting firms leave the registered globals feature enabled, he notes, which leaves their customers at risk.

Web application security vulnerabilities are the hot ticket now, and the CVE, which is sponsored by the Department of Homeland Security, reflects that. Mitre's report also demonstrates that it's not just the popular bugs that must be addressed, says Robert Martin, lead for compatibility and outreach at Mitre. "There are other more complex and dangerous types of errors you need to be aware of to prevent and remove."

Christey and Martin say they haven't analyzed the 2007 CVE numbers by bug as yet. But Mitre says so far there have been 2,245 vulnerabilities reported the first half of this year, just slightly ahead of last year this time, which was 2,143. That represents a drastic drop in the rate of growth of bug disclosures, but researchers still expect this year to break last year's record. (See Bug Disclosures Decline.)

— Kelly Jackson Higgins, Senior Editor, Dark Reading

  • Mitre
  • Mandiant Kelly Jackson Higgins is the Executive Editor of Dark Reading. She is an award-winning veteran technology and business journalist with more than two decades of experience in reporting and editing for various publications, including Network Computing, Secure Enterprise ... View Full Bio
     

    Recommended Reading:

    Comment  | 
    Print  | 
    More Insights
  • Comments
    Newest First  |  Oldest First  |  Threaded View
    COVID-19: Latest Security News & Commentary
    Dark Reading Staff 5/28/2020
    Stay-at-Home Orders Coincide With Massive DNS Surge
    Robert Lemos, Contributing Writer,  5/27/2020
    Register for Dark Reading Newsletters
    White Papers
    Video
    Cartoon Contest
    Write a Caption, Win a Starbucks Card! Click Here
    Latest Comment: Can you smell me now?
    Current Issue
    How Cybersecurity Incident Response Programs Work (and Why Some Don't)
    This Tech Digest takes a look at the vital role cybersecurity incident response (IR) plays in managing cyber-risk within organizations. Download the Tech Digest today to find out how well-planned IR programs can detect intrusions, contain breaches, and help an organization restore normal operations.
    Flash Poll
    Twitter Feed
    Dark Reading - Bug Report
    Bug Report
    Enterprise Vulnerabilities
    From DHS/US-CERT's National Vulnerability Database
    CVE-2020-11844
    PUBLISHED: 2020-05-29
    There is an Incorrect Authorization vulnerability in Micro Focus Service Management Automation (SMA) product affecting version 2018.05 to 2020.02. The vulnerability could be exploited to provide unauthorized access to the Container Deployment Foundation.
    CVE-2020-6937
    PUBLISHED: 2020-05-29
    A Denial of Service vulnerability in MuleSoft Mule CE/EE 3.8.x, 3.9.x, and 4.x released before April 7, 2020, could allow remote attackers to submit data which can lead to resource exhaustion.
    CVE-2020-7648
    PUBLISHED: 2020-05-29
    All versions of snyk-broker before 4.72.2 are vulnerable to Arbitrary File Read. It allows arbitrary file reads for users who have access to Snyk's internal network by appending the URL with a fragment identifier and a whitelisted path e.g. `#package.json`
    CVE-2020-7650
    PUBLISHED: 2020-05-29
    All versions of snyk-broker after 4.72.0 including and before 4.73.1 are vulnerable to Arbitrary File Read. It allows arbitrary file reads to users with access to Snyk's internal network of any files ending in the following extensions: yaml, yml or json.
    CVE-2020-7654
    PUBLISHED: 2020-05-29
    All versions of snyk-broker before 4.73.1 are vulnerable to Information Exposure. It logs private keys if logging level is set to DEBUG.