Dark Reading is part of the Informa Tech Division of Informa PLC

This site is operated by a business or businesses owned by Informa PLC and all copyright resides with them.Informa PLC's registered office is 5 Howick Place, London SW1P 1WG. Registered in England and Wales. Number 8860726.


Banks Ready for Compliance Deadline

With a week to go before the FFIEC deadline, most financial institutions are ready for multifactor authentication

Dec. 31, 2006 will bring out an array of party hats, confetti, and noisemakers across the globe. But in the recesses of data centers in many banks and financial institutions, that date may give IT workers another reason to pop the champagne cork.

New Year's Eve is the final deadline for financial organizations to meet multifactor authentication requirements outlined by the Federal Financial Institutions Examinations Council (FFIEC), which helps to govern security requirements for banks and other organizations that handle consumer funds. The FFIEC guidelines, which were issued in October of last year, require financial institutions to deploy a second form of user authentication by Dec. 31 or face fines of $10,000 and up.

And it looks like most banks will beat the deadline, experts say. "I would say about 80 percent of the industry is in full compliance right now," says Marne Gordan, director of regulatory affairs at Cybertrust. "Even among the organizations that aren't in compliance, most of them are in position to be compliant before the auditors start doing their examinations."

The Aite Group LLC, a research firm that follows the financial services industry, confirms that the majority of banks will achieve FFIEC compliance by the Dec. 31 deadline, though its numbers are less optimistic. In a report issued at the beginning of last month, The Aite Group estimated that 66 percent of financial institutions will be in compliance by the end of the year, with the rest following in 2007.

"Even for the organizations that don't make it, there's still some time," Gordan observes. The FFIEC will begin making its examinations in February, she notes, and even then, "they will probably give some grace to organizations that have made a good-faith effort to achieve compliance, but may have overlooked something in the process," she predicts.

Unlike other compliance guidelines, such as Sarbanes-Oxley or HIPAA, the FFIEC guidelines are fairly straightforward. They state that banks and financial institutions that do business online must implement a second factor of authentication -- besides the simple password -- by the end of the year.

That second factor of authentication could be a "security question" that is difficult for a phisher or identity thief to discover, or it could be a token, smart card or biometric signature that a thief cannot replicate.

With phishing and identity fraud running rampant -- and scaring away many online customers -- most banks and financial institutions were moving in the direction of multifactor authentication anyway, experts say. The Anti-Phishing Working Group reported a 50 percent increase in phishing sites between September and October (See Report: Phish Jump), and some banks have completely stopped using email as a means of communicating with customers.

"It's out of control," says Gordan. "Two-factor authentication won't solve the problem, but at least it will put a stop to the simplest phishing techniques, where the phisher just sends out a lot of spam and hopes that users will give up their passwords. Now, the phisher will have to get two pieces of information, and those pieces of information will be different from bank to bank."

There are a few financial organizations -- mostly smaller credit unions -- that still haven't done anything with FFIEC compliance, but most of the organizations are up to speed, Gordan says.

"This is one area where compliance makes good business sense," Gordan says. "Identity theft is such a huge problem. Meeting the FFIEC deadlines will help."

— Tim Wilson, Site Editor, Dark Reading

  • Cybertrust

    Tim Wilson is Editor in Chief and co-founder of Dark Reading.com, UBM Tech's online community for information security professionals. He is responsible for managing the site, assigning and editing content, and writing breaking news stories. Wilson has been recognized as one ... View Full Bio

    Comment  | 
    Print  | 
    More Insights
  • Comments
    Newest First  |  Oldest First  |  Threaded View
    COVID-19: Latest Security News & Commentary
    Dark Reading Staff 11/19/2020
    New Proposed DNS Security Features Released
    Kelly Jackson Higgins, Executive Editor at Dark Reading,  11/19/2020
    The Yellow Brick Road to Risk Management
    Andrew Lowe, Senior Information Security Consultant, TalaTek,  11/19/2020
    Register for Dark Reading Newsletters
    White Papers
    Cartoon Contest
    Write a Caption, Win an Amazon Gift Card! Click Here
    Latest Comment: He hits the gong anytime he sees someone click on an email link.
    Current Issue
    2021 Top Enterprise IT Trends
    We've identified the key trends that are poised to impact the IT landscape in 2021. Find out why they're important and how they will affect you today!
    Flash Poll
    Twitter Feed
    Dark Reading - Bug Report
    Bug Report
    Enterprise Vulnerabilities
    From DHS/US-CERT's National Vulnerability Database
    PUBLISHED: 2020-11-25
    osCommerce has XSS vulnerability via the authenticated user entering the XSS payload into the title section of newsletters.
    PUBLISHED: 2020-11-25
    GLPI stands for Gestionnaire Libre de Parc Informatique and it is a Free Asset and IT Management Software package, that provides ITIL Service Desk features, licenses tracking and software auditing. In GLPI before version 9.5.3, any authenticated user has read-only permissions to the planning of ever...
    PUBLISHED: 2020-11-25
    Nanopb is a small code-size Protocol Buffers implementation. In Nanopb before versions 0.4.4 and, decoding specifically formed message can leak memory if dynamic allocation is enabled and an oneof field contains a static submessage that contains a dynamic field, and the message being decoded...
    PUBLISHED: 2020-11-25
    A flaw was found in the way the spice-vdagentd daemon handled file transfers from the host system to the virtual machine. Any unprivileged local guest user with access to the UNIX domain socket path `/run/spice-vdagentd/spice-vdagent-sock` could use this flaw to perform a memory denial of service fo...
    PUBLISHED: 2020-11-25
    An XSS issue was found in the Shares feature of LiquidFiles before 3.3.19. The issue arises from the insecure rendering of HTML files uploaded to the platform as attachments, when the -htmlview URL is directly accessed. The impact ranges from executing commands as root on the server to retrieving se...