Dark Reading is part of the Informa Tech Division of Informa PLC

This site is operated by a business or businesses owned by Informa PLC and all copyright resides with them.Informa PLC's registered office is 5 Howick Place, London SW1P 1WG. Registered in England and Wales. Number 8860726.

Risk

12/13/2013
07:05 AM
Connect Directly
Twitter
RSS
E-Mail
50%
50%

Advancing The IT Security DNA Through Risk Management

Shifting focus from the bright shiny things to critical business processes can actually stand to advance security technical maturity along with true risk mitigation

If an IT security organization feels it's in a maturity rut, perhaps stuck in the compliance-focused hamster wheel or lacking enough line-of-business support to make necessary security investments, one of the fast ways out of it is to take the spotlight away from security processes and technology and move it to business processes and business risks.

"Shifting the focus from technical things, from the bright, shiny security objects, to instead being about critical business processes, that shift is a big deal for risk management," says Sam Curry, chief strategy officer and chief technologist for RSA, the security division of EMC.

In its work with members of its Security for Business Innovation Council (SBIC), RSA recently helped publish a report on how to transform information security, with highlighted recommendations from security executives at a selection of Global 1000 firms. Among the five major suggestions for future-proofing security processes, three of them revolved around reworking IT risk management so its activities are cast in the light of its relativity to the business.

According to leading CISOs and CSOs, in addition to shifting their focus from technical assets to critical business processes, they should also be instituting business estimates of cybersecurity risks in order to show the financial impact to the business when risks come to play, as well as establishing a business-centric risk assessment process.

Critical to all of it is meaningful collaboration -- essentially folding in IT risk management decision-making into every business initiative of the company just as enterprise risk management is involved to calculate other business risks.

[Are you using your human sensors? See Using The Human Perimeter To Detect Outside Attacks.]

"A key aspect of risk management is having a process in place to ensure that for every initiative in your organization, a risk assessment is done at a very early stage in the lifecycle," says one SBIC participant, Vishal Salvi, CISO for HDFC Bank Limited.

It's why Dwayne Melancon of Tripwire recommends cross-functional teams to help establish a good hybrid perspective on IT risks.

"A number of organizations I work with have cross-functional teams that look at risk holistically to better understand dependencies, and these teams make recommendations about which risks the company should focus on from a business perspective," says Melancon, CTO of Tripwire. "The discussion and agreement process makes it a lot easier to allocate scarce resources to the highest priorities for the whole business."

Melancon says that focusing too much on technical risks instead of business risks is a common mistake of IT professionals working in isolation while conducting risk assessments.

"A top down, risk-based approach is best -- it allows you to focus on the 'so what?' aspect of risk to the business, instead of going down a technical rat hole around a risk that doesn't really impact the business in a significant way," he says.

This last point is important in understanding how collaboration between IT security and line-of-business leaders should work; the teamwork shouldn't be focused on making business people learn the intricacies of IT security technology. In fact, it means the opposite, Curry says.

"The security guys have to wake up and learn about business. It means the security people have to start carrying business books around and start talking to their peers and that will do more to advance the DNA of a company from a security perspective than the reverse," Curry says. "And when you do that, you find the technical maturation happens more easily."

Have a comment on this story? Please click "Add Your Comment" below. If you'd like to contact Dark Reading's editors directly, send us a message. Ericka Chickowski specializes in coverage of information technology and business innovation. She has focused on information security for the better part of a decade and regularly writes about the security industry as a contributor to Dark Reading.  View Full Bio

Comment  | 
Print  | 
More Insights
Comments
Newest First  |  Oldest First  |  Threaded View
Why Cyber-Risk Is a C-Suite Issue
Marc Wilczek, Digital Strategist & CIO Advisor,  11/12/2019
The Cold Truth about Cyber Insurance
Chris Kennedy, CISO & VP Customer Success, AttackIQ,  11/7/2019
Black Hat Q&A: Hacking a '90s Sports Car
Black Hat Staff, ,  11/7/2019
Register for Dark Reading Newsletters
White Papers
Video
Cartoon Contest
Current Issue
7 Threats & Disruptive Forces Changing the Face of Cybersecurity
This Dark Reading Tech Digest gives an in-depth look at the biggest emerging threats and disruptive forces that are changing the face of cybersecurity today.
Flash Poll
Rethinking Enterprise Data Defense
Rethinking Enterprise Data Defense
Frustrated with recurring intrusions and breaches, cybersecurity professionals are questioning some of the industrys conventional wisdom. Heres a look at what theyre thinking about.
Twitter Feed
Dark Reading - Bug Report
Bug Report
Enterprise Vulnerabilities
From DHS/US-CERT's National Vulnerability Database
CVE-2019-5230
PUBLISHED: 2019-11-13
P20 Pro, P20, Mate RS smartphones with versions earlier than Charlotte-AL00A 9.1.0.321(C00E320R1P1T8), versions earlier than Emily-AL00A 9.1.0.321(C00E320R1P1T8), versions earlier than NEO-AL00D NEO-AL00 9.1.0.321(C786E320R1P1T8) have an improper validation vulnerability. The system does not perform...
CVE-2019-5231
PUBLISHED: 2019-11-13
P30 smartphones with versions earlier than ELLE-AL00B 9.1.0.186(C00E180R2P1) have an improper authorization vulnerability. The software incorrectly performs an authorization check when a user attempts to perform certain action. Successful exploit could allow the attacker to update a crafted package.
CVE-2019-5233
PUBLISHED: 2019-11-13
Huawei smartphones with versions earlier than Taurus-AL00B 10.0.0.41(SP2C00E41R3P2) have an improper authentication vulnerability. Successful exploitation may cause the attacker to access specific components.
CVE-2019-5246
PUBLISHED: 2019-11-13
Smartphones with software of ELLE-AL00B 9.1.0.109(C00E106R1P21), 9.1.0.113(C00E110R1P21), 9.1.0.125(C00E120R1P21), 9.1.0.135(C00E130R1P21), 9.1.0.153(C00E150R1P21), 9.1.0.155(C00E150R1P21), 9.1.0.162(C00E160R2P1) have an insufficient verification vulnerability. The system does not verify certain par...
CVE-2010-4177
PUBLISHED: 2019-11-12
mysql-gui-tools (mysql-query-browser and mysql-admin) before 5.0r14+openSUSE-2.3 exposes the password of a user connected to the MySQL server in clear text form via the list of running processes.