Dark Reading is part of the Informa Tech Division of Informa PLC

This site is operated by a business or businesses owned by Informa PLC and all copyright resides with them.Informa PLC's registered office is 5 Howick Place, London SW1P 1WG. Registered in England and Wales. Number 8860726.

Risk

7/20/2010
03:39 PM
Connect Directly
Google+
Twitter
RSS
E-Mail
50%
50%

Adobe To 'Sandbox' PDF Files

Upcoming security feature for Adobe Reader puts PDFs in protected mode

In the latest move to lock down its applications from attack, Adobe announced today it will add a default sandboxing feature to the next version of the Adobe Reader software. The new "Protected Mode" for Reader, which it will roll out later this year, will quarantine any operations to a confined and restricted space.

Adobe apps have been in the bull's eye as one of the most popular attack vectors, especially in the form of malware-laden PDF files. Adobe has been beefing up its security posture during the past year, starting with its automatic updater feature for Reader and Acrobat and a regular patching schedule. Another big piece of Adobe's security strategy is hardening its code against attacks, says Brad Arkin, senior director of product security and privacy. "Sandboxing was one of the early technology candidates we looked at" for code-hardening, he says.

The new Protected Mode feature is based on the sandboxing technique used by Microsoft in Office 2010 and by Google in its Chrome browser. The first release of the sandboxing feature will keep all "write" calls inside the protected space so that if a PDF is infected with malware, the malicious code can't spread outside that file to the system itself or to other files. The second phase of the Protected Mode release for Reader will prevent attackers from reading information on the victim machine's system via an infected PDF. "It will be harder for the bad guys to install malicious software or anything persistent on a computer that could survive from one reboot to [the next]," Arkin says.

Sandboxing basically quarantines any malware that's embedded in a PDF. "Real-world attacks today are almost always some variant of a memory trespass vulnerability," Arkin says. Sandboxing, which restricts what an attacker is able to do with a PDF file, should eliminate many of those types of threats, he says.

But the cat-and-mouse game between security experts and attackers will likely just move to another vector, he says. "Once we put this out, attackers will either move to another application or they might look for creative ways to work around it," he says.

Security experts welcomed Adobe's adoption of sandboxing, but they don't expect it to dissuade attackers from continuing to hammer away at Adobe apps. "Reader will continue to be a really big target for a while, even with the sandbox environment," says Andrew Storms, director of security operations at nCircle. "But we need to congratulate Adobe for another tool to help protect ourselves and our users."

Storms says the true weakest link is still the user. "The idea is to use the tools the vendors are giving you, but you still have to apply your own risk assessment," he says.

Adobe's Arkin says Adobe worked with Microsoft Office's security team, the Google Chrome team, as well as other outside experts in implementing the sandboxing technology in Reader. It's based on Microsoft's practical Windows sandboxing technique, and works like this in Reader: when Reader needs to execute any action not allowed in the sandbox such as launching an attachment inside a PDF file from another app, for example, that action gets vetted by a broker process with specific policies that prevent access to any functions that could open the system up to attack.

The goal is to stop attackers from writing files, changing registry keys, or installing malicious code via PDFs -- but without the user noticing any difference in the Reader app, Arkin says. "There's no performance impact, no change to the interface, no dialog box – it's just happening in the background. And users don't change the way they interact with PDFs," he says.

Sandboxing does not, however, prevent phishing or clickjacking attacks, he notes. "There's nothing we can do to protect against users who follow" links in infected PDFs purportedly from their banks, for example, he says.

Just how long sandboxing techniques will stand up to attacks is unclear. nCircle's Storms says attackers probably will come up with ways to subvert sandboxing much the way researchers have done with Microsoft's Address Space Layout Randomization (ASLR) and Data Execution Protection (DEP) security features. "The question is how quickly Adobe, Microsoft, and Google react" to any challenges to the technique, he says.

Have a comment on this story? Please click "Discuss" below. If you'd like to contact Dark Reading's editors directly, send us a message.

Kelly Jackson Higgins is the Executive Editor of Dark Reading. She is an award-winning veteran technology and business journalist with more than two decades of experience in reporting and editing for various publications, including Network Computing, Secure Enterprise ... View Full Bio

Comment  | 
Print  | 
More Insights
Comments
Newest First  |  Oldest First  |  Threaded View
Zero-Factor Authentication: Owning Our Data
Nick Selby, Chief Security Officer at Paxos Trust Company,  2/19/2020
44% of Security Threats Start in the Cloud
Kelly Sheridan, Staff Editor, Dark Reading,  2/19/2020
Ransomware Damage Hit $11.5B in 2019
Dark Reading Staff 2/20/2020
Register for Dark Reading Newsletters
White Papers
Video
Cartoon
Current Issue
6 Emerging Cyber Threats That Enterprises Face in 2020
This Tech Digest gives an in-depth look at six emerging cyber threats that enterprises could face in 2020. Download your copy today!
Flash Poll
How Enterprises Are Developing and Maintaining Secure Applications
How Enterprises Are Developing and Maintaining Secure Applications
The concept of application security is well known, but application security testing and remediation processes remain unbalanced. Most organizations are confident in their approach to AppSec, although others seem to have no approach at all. Read this report to find out more.
Twitter Feed
Dark Reading - Bug Report
Bug Report
Enterprise Vulnerabilities
From DHS/US-CERT's National Vulnerability Database
CVE-2020-5524
PUBLISHED: 2020-02-21
Aterm series (Aterm WF1200C firmware Ver1.2.1 and earlier, Aterm WG1200CR firmware Ver1.2.1 and earlier, Aterm WG2600HS firmware Ver1.3.2 and earlier) allows an attacker on the same network segment to execute arbitrary OS commands with root privileges via UPnP function.
CVE-2020-5525
PUBLISHED: 2020-02-21
Aterm series (Aterm WF1200C firmware Ver1.2.1 and earlier, Aterm WG1200CR firmware Ver1.2.1 and earlier, Aterm WG2600HS firmware Ver1.3.2 and earlier) allows an authenticated attacker on the same network segment to execute arbitrary OS commands with root privileges via management screen.
CVE-2020-5533
PUBLISHED: 2020-02-21
Cross-site scripting vulnerability in Aterm WG2600HS firmware Ver1.3.2 and earlier allows remote attackers to inject arbitrary web script or HTML via unspecified vectors.
CVE-2020-5534
PUBLISHED: 2020-02-21
Aterm WG2600HS firmware Ver1.3.2 and earlier allows an authenticated attacker on the same network segment to execute arbitrary OS commands with root privileges via unspecified vectors.
CVE-2014-7914
PUBLISHED: 2020-02-21
btif/src/btif_dm.c in Android before 5.1 does not properly enforce the temporary nature of a Bluetooth pairing, which allows user-assisted remote attackers to bypass intended access restrictions via crafted Bluetooth packets after the tapping of a crafted NFC tag.