Dark Reading is part of the Informa Tech Division of Informa PLC

This site is operated by a business or businesses owned by Informa PLC and all copyright resides with them.Informa PLC's registered office is 5 Howick Place, London SW1P 1WG. Registered in England and Wales. Number 8860726.

Risk

ACLU Issues Wake-Up Call To Android Service Providers

In complaint to FTC, civil liberties organization accuses AT&T, Verizon, Sprint, and T-Mobile of "unfair and deceptive business practices"

The American Civil Liberties Union this week filed a complaint with the Federal Trade Commission alleging that mobile and wireless service providers are failing in their efforts to protect the security of Android devices.

In a blog about Android security, the ACLU suggests that AT&T, Verizon, Sprint, and T-Mobile are engaging in "unfair and deceptive business practices" by failing to warn their customers about known, unpatched security flaws in the Androids they distribute.

The ACLU isn't faulting the service providers for the flaws -- it's complaining that the carriers are too slow to issue the patches that fix them.

"This is in sharp contrast to the norm on the desktop, where Mac and PCs both receive regular security updates directly from Apple and Microsoft," the ACLU says. "Apple also provides regular security updates to mobile devices, such as the iPad and iPhone. And it is standard practice for the companies that make almost all widely used software -- such as operating systems, web browsers and third party applications -- to issue regular updates to their software, including security fixes."

The complaint appears to be the ACLU's attempt to consolidate accountability for the slow patching of vulnerabilities in the Android, which is manufactured in a variety of different form factors by a host of different manufacturers -- all of which are on different patching schedules.

"If the mobile carriers are not going to provide important security updates, the FTC should at a minimum force them to provide device refunds to consumers and allow consumers to terminate their contracts without penalty so that they can switch to a provider who will," the ACLU says.

It will be interesting to see what the FTC does with the complaint. In the past, the commission has levied penalties against companies that failed to maintain good security practices and put their customers at risk of data theft. But in this case, the complaint does not point to any specific breach -- it states that the carriers are deceiving customers by failing to warn them about potential vulnerabilities.

Whatever happens with the FTC, the idea of consolidating accountability for Android patching is a good one. As it stands, Google is responsible for identifying the flaws and fixing them, and it is issuing patches at a record rate -- but it can't ensure that all of the different Android device manufacturers and service providers patch their products quickly. If the FTC sides with the ACLU, then those patches may get out faster -- and Android devices might be safer to use. Tim Wilson is Editor in Chief and co-founder of Dark Reading.com, UBM Tech's online community for information security professionals. He is responsible for managing the site, assigning and editing content, and writing breaking news stories. Wilson has been recognized as one ... View Full Bio

Comment  | 
Print  | 
More Insights
Comments
Newest First  |  Oldest First  |  Threaded View
speedo1456
50%
50%
speedo1456,
User Rank: Apprentice
7/13/2014 | 7:44:03 PM
Wake up is needed
Exactly what is needed. There are a lot of security and bug breaches in the Android segment. If this is not attended to at a short while many will go to the mobile windows market.
DevSecOps: The Answer to the Cloud Security Skills Gap
Lamont Orange, Chief Information Security Officer at Netskope,  11/15/2019
Attackers' Costs Increasing as Businesses Focus on Security
Robert Lemos, Contributing Writer,  11/15/2019
I 'Hacked' My Accounts Using My Mobile Number: Here's What I Learned
Nicole Sette, Director in the Cyber Risk practice of Kroll, a division of Duff & Phelps,  11/19/2019
Register for Dark Reading Newsletters
White Papers
Video
Cartoon Contest
Current Issue
Navigating the Deluge of Security Data
In this Tech Digest, Dark Reading shares the experiences of some top security practitioners as they navigate volumes of security data. We examine some examples of how enterprises can cull this data to find the clues they need.
Flash Poll
Rethinking Enterprise Data Defense
Rethinking Enterprise Data Defense
Frustrated with recurring intrusions and breaches, cybersecurity professionals are questioning some of the industrys conventional wisdom. Heres a look at what theyre thinking about.
Twitter Feed
Dark Reading - Bug Report
Bug Report
Enterprise Vulnerabilities
From DHS/US-CERT's National Vulnerability Database
CVE-2019-5087
PUBLISHED: 2019-11-21
An exploitable integer overflow vulnerability exists in the flattenIncrementally function in the xcf2png and xcf2pnm binaries of xcftools 1.0.7. An integer overflow can occur while calculating the row's allocation size, that could be exploited to corrupt memory and eventually execute arbitrary code....
CVE-2019-5509
PUBLISHED: 2019-11-21
ONTAP Select Deploy administration utility versions 2.11.2 through 2.12.2 are susceptible to a code injection vulnerability which when successfully exploited could allow an unauthenticated remote attacker to enable and use a privileged user account.
CVE-2019-6693
PUBLISHED: 2019-11-21
Use of a hard-coded cryptographic key to cipher sensitive data in FortiOS configuration backup file may allow an attacker with access to the backup file to decipher the sensitive data, via knowledge of the hard-coded key. The aforementioned sensitive data includes users' passwords (except the admini...
CVE-2019-17272
PUBLISHED: 2019-11-21
All versions of ONTAP Select Deploy administration utility are susceptible to a vulnerability which when successfully exploited could allow an administrative user to escalate their privileges.
CVE-2019-17650
PUBLISHED: 2019-11-21
An Improper Neutralization of Special Elements used in a Command vulnerability in one of FortiClient for Mac OS root processes, may allow a local user of the system on which FortiClient is running to execute unauthorized code as root by bypassing a security check.