Dark Reading is part of the Informa Tech Division of Informa PLC

This site is operated by a business or businesses owned by Informa PLC and all copyright resides with them.Informa PLC's registered office is 5 Howick Place, London SW1P 1WG. Registered in England and Wales. Number 8860726.

Risk

1/31/2008
02:23 AM
Connect Directly
Google+
Twitter
RSS
E-Mail
50%
50%

90% of Facebook Apps Have Unnecessary Access to Private Data

Researcher is building a prototype to protect users' privacy from Facebook 'widgets'

University of Virginia researchers have discovered that 90.7 percent of Facebook's most popular applications have access to users' private data, whether they need it or not -- leaving users exposed to targeted phishing attacks and identity theft. So a UVA researcher is currently building a "privacy-by-proxy" prototype aimed at hiding a user's private information on Facebook from these apps.

Today, a third-party Facebook "widget" or application requires full user privileges to a user's account on the social networking site, including his or her name, address, friends' profiles, and photos. There's no way to specify which apps can access which personal information. So Adrienne Felt, a fourth-year computer science major at UVA, is developing an application that lets Facebook users run these widgets while keeping their private data private. It basically works like this: The Facebook server gives the application a random sequence of letters in lieu of the user's name and other private data.

Felt began developing the tool after studying the top 150 Facebook third-party platform applications last fall. It turns out 8.7 percent of these widgets didn’t need any personal information, she found, and only 9.3 percent required private data -- the remaining 82 percent used "public" Facebook data, such as the user's name, network, and list of friends. Felt and fellow researcher Andrew Spisak concluded that nearly 91 percent of these apps are getting access to more privileges than they actually need in order to run.

And when users install these widgets, their data gets stored on the widgets' third-party servers. Although Facebook's terms of service say developers can't abuse the Facebook data they access, there's no way for Facebook to enforce that, Felt says, because once that data leaves Facebook's servers, it's free game to the third-party application provider.

Privacy has always been a sticky issue for social networking sites. But Facebook's third-party apps, which anyone with a Facebook account can develop, have been considered by some security experts as an open invitation for abuse. Earlier this month, Fortinet researchers found the first evidence of such abuse, reporting spyware disguised as a Facebook application spreading around the social networking site. (See 'Secret Crush' Spreads Spyware, Not Love.)

Kevin Haley, director, of product management for Symantec Security Response, says another risk with these apps is the distribution of malware. "Now that you have a platform to create programs for these sites... malware quickly follows," he says.

Felt's prototype is providing some hope for protecting and securing Facebook users' privacy. "This is the first step," says Felt, who has built several Facebook widgets herself. "Hopefully, the research findings and proposed solution will trigger more responsible privacy and information management policies from social networking sites and will better inform users."

— Kelly Jackson Higgins, Senior Editor, Dark Reading

  • Fortinet Inc.

    Kelly Jackson Higgins is the Executive Editor of Dark Reading. She is an award-winning veteran technology and business journalist with more than two decades of experience in reporting and editing for various publications, including Network Computing, Secure Enterprise ... View Full Bio

    Comment  | 
    Print  | 
    More Insights
  • Comments
    Newest First  |  Oldest First  |  Threaded View
    Firms Improve Threat Detection but Face Increasingly Disruptive Attacks
    Robert Lemos, Contributing Writer,  2/20/2020
    Ransomware Damage Hit $11.5B in 2019
    Dark Reading Staff 2/20/2020
    Register for Dark Reading Newsletters
    White Papers
    Video
    Cartoon
    Current Issue
    6 Emerging Cyber Threats That Enterprises Face in 2020
    This Tech Digest gives an in-depth look at six emerging cyber threats that enterprises could face in 2020. Download your copy today!
    Flash Poll
    How Enterprises Are Developing and Maintaining Secure Applications
    How Enterprises Are Developing and Maintaining Secure Applications
    The concept of application security is well known, but application security testing and remediation processes remain unbalanced. Most organizations are confident in their approach to AppSec, although others seem to have no approach at all. Read this report to find out more.
    Twitter Feed
    Dark Reading - Bug Report
    Bug Report
    Enterprise Vulnerabilities
    From DHS/US-CERT's National Vulnerability Database
    CVE-2018-19668
    PUBLISHED: 2020-02-27
    ** REJECT ** DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: CVE-2018-17963. Reason: This candidate is a reservation duplicate of CVE-2018-17963. Notes: All CVE users should reference CVE-2018-17963 instead of this candidate. All references and descriptions in this candidate have been removed to preve...
    CVE-2019-12882
    PUBLISHED: 2020-02-27
    ** REJECT ** DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: This candidate was withdrawn by its CNA. Further investigation showed that it was not a security issue. Notes: none.
    CVE-2017-6363
    PUBLISHED: 2020-02-27
    ** DISPUTED ** In the GD Graphics Library (aka LibGD) through 2.2.5, there is a heap-based buffer over-read in tiffWriter in gd_tiff.c. NOTE: the vendor says "In my opinion this issue should not have a CVE, since the GD and GD2 formats are documented to be 'obsolete, and should only be used for...
    CVE-2017-6371
    PUBLISHED: 2020-02-27
    Synchronet BBS 3.16c for Windows allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (service crash) via a long string in the HTTP Referer header.
    CVE-2017-5861
    PUBLISHED: 2020-02-27
    ** REJECT ** DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: CVE-2017-1000020. Reason: This candidate is a reservation duplicate of CVE-2017-1000020. Notes: All CVE users should reference CVE-2017-1000020 instead of this candidate. All references and descriptions in this candidate have been removed to...