Dark Reading is part of the Informa Tech Division of Informa PLC

This site is operated by a business or businesses owned by Informa PLC and all copyright resides with them.Informa PLC's registered office is 5 Howick Place, London SW1P 1WG. Registered in England and Wales. Number 8860726.

Risk

3/30/2015
10:05 AM
Connect Directly
Twitter
Twitter
RSS
E-Mail

7 Bugs, Breaches, & Compromises To Rock 2015 (So Far)

The year's started off with a bang; will we hear risk management pros whimper?
2 of 8

GitHub Gets Hosed By DDoS
While data breaches and IP theft typically steals the headlines, the massive attack against GitHub late last week and over the weekend offers a good lesson in why reducing the risk of denial of service attacks should be on the radar of any security team. The software collaboration and open source code sharing service reported on Thursday experiencing the largest DDoS attack in its history and ongoing status updates showed it took days to completely mitigate the onslaught, which used a number of attack vectors, including 'some sophisticated new techniques that use web browsers of unsuspecting, uninvolved people to flood github.com with high levels of traffic.' Read more. 
(Image: Github)

GitHub Gets Hosed By DDoS

While data breaches and IP theft typically steals the headlines, the massive attack against GitHub late last week and over the weekend offers a good lesson in why reducing the risk of denial of service attacks should be on the radar of any security team. The software collaboration and open source code sharing service reported on Thursday experiencing the largest DDoS attack in its history and ongoing status updates showed it took days to completely mitigate the onslaught, which used a number of attack vectors, including "some sophisticated new techniques that use web browsers of unsuspecting, uninvolved people to flood github.com with high levels of traffic." Read more.

(Image: Github)

2 of 8
Comment  | 
Print  | 
Comments
Newest First  |  Oldest First  |  Threaded View
hho927
0%
100%
hho927,
User Rank: Guru
3/31/2015 | 7:18:34 PM
Re: Only the Beginning
It's more complex than that.

It's either: 1) Management is not competent. Some managers are like "what are you doing? You're not doing anything productive. We don't see any result. We are wasting money." 2) Then there are incompetent security experts who are faking security. They are not doing aything + keeps making things up and pointing fingers.

Security is trying to find out the holes, try to break, try to exploit the system. Most of the time is trying to break the system and then finding the solution. How do you know they are lying, playing or working without a total understanding of the computer security?
Jason.straight@unitedlex.com
50%
50%
[email protected],
User Rank: Apprentice
3/31/2015 | 12:52:55 PM
Re: Only the Beginning
So true!
RyanSepe
50%
50%
RyanSepe,
User Rank: Ninja
3/30/2015 | 12:42:22 PM
Only the Beginning
These are only the beginning...We still have a majority of the year left and it seems many organizations are taking a reactive approach and rolling the dice.
The Security of Cloud Applications
Hillel Solow, CTO and Co-founder, Protego,  7/11/2019
Where Businesses Waste Endpoint Security Budgets
Kelly Sheridan, Staff Editor, Dark Reading,  7/15/2019
Register for Dark Reading Newsletters
White Papers
Video
Cartoon Contest
Current Issue
Building and Managing an IT Security Operations Program
As cyber threats grow, many organizations are building security operations centers (SOCs) to improve their defenses. In this Tech Digest you will learn tips on how to get the most out of a SOC in your organization - and what to do if you can't afford to build one.
Flash Poll
The State of IT Operations and Cybersecurity Operations
The State of IT Operations and Cybersecurity Operations
Your enterprise's cyber risk may depend upon the relationship between the IT team and the security team. Heres some insight on what's working and what isn't in the data center.
Twitter Feed
Dark Reading - Bug Report
Bug Report
Enterprise Vulnerabilities
From DHS/US-CERT's National Vulnerability Database
CVE-2019-13643
PUBLISHED: 2019-07-18
Stored XSS in EspoCRM before 5.6.4 allows remote attackers to execute malicious JavaScript and inject arbitrary source code into the target pages. The attack begins by storing a new stream message containing an XSS payload. The stored payload can then be triggered by clicking a malicious link on the...
CVE-2019-13644
PUBLISHED: 2019-07-18
Firefly III before 4.7.17.1 is vulnerable to stored XSS due to lack of filtration of user-supplied data in a budget name. The JavaScript code is contained in a transaction, and is executed on the tags/show/$tag_number$ tag summary page.
CVE-2019-13645
PUBLISHED: 2019-07-18
Firefly III before 4.7.17.3 is vulnerable to stored XSS due to lack of filtration of user-supplied data in image file names. The JavaScript code is executed during attachments/edit/$file_id$ attachment editing.
CVE-2019-13646
PUBLISHED: 2019-07-18
Firefly III before 4.7.17.3 is vulnerable to reflected XSS due to lack of filtration of user-supplied data in a search query.
CVE-2019-13647
PUBLISHED: 2019-07-18
Firefly III before 4.7.17.3 is vulnerable to stored XSS due to lack of filtration of user-supplied data in image file content. The JavaScript code is executed during attachments/view/$file_id$ attachment viewing.