Dark Reading is part of the Informa Tech Division of Informa PLC

This site is operated by a business or businesses owned by Informa PLC and all copyright resides with them.Informa PLC's registered office is 5 Howick Place, London SW1P 1WG. Registered in England and Wales. Number 8860726.

Risk

3/30/2007
02:55 PM
50%
50%

When The 2 Billionth Customer Record Is Stolen, Insiders Will Be The Most Guilty

While I was researching my next story on the danger that employees, contractors, and business partners (i.e., insiders) can place on the security of corporate data, a friend of mine sent me an interesting study that noted, among several other fascinating data points, that last year personal records were compromised at a rate of 5.8 million per month. At this rate, by the end of the year more than 2 billion records

While I was researching my next story on the danger that employees, contractors, and business partners (i.e., insiders) can place on the security of corporate data, a friend of mine sent me an interesting study that noted, among several other fascinating data points, that last year personal records were compromised at a rate of 5.8 million per month. At this rate, by the end of the year more than 2 billion records will have been lost or stolen since 1980, the study says, and the majority of those breaches will have been the result of mismanagement, which includes insider attacks. I wish I could say that was the most surprising security news I heard this week.Buried deep within TJX's SEC filing this week revealing that more than 45 million customer records had been compromised by malicious hackers was the mention that the cyberthieves may have had access to the decryption tool for the encryption software that TJX uses. I'm not one for conspiracy theories, but it strikes me that the criminals could only have gotten this decryption key through a successful hack into wherever TJX stored those keys, or the key was given to them by an insider with intimate knowledge of TJX's IT systems.

On average, personal records in 2006 were compromised at a rate of 5.8 million a month, up from 5.2 million a month in 2005, according to a report published by two University of Washington researchers earlier this month. The report, written by Philip Howard, an assistant professor in the Communication Department, and Kris Erickson, a doctoral candidate in geography at the university, extrapolates that by the end of this year more than 2 billion personal records will have been lost or stolen since 1980. The report, entitled "News Accounts of Hacker, Consumer, and Organizational Responsibility for Compromised Digital Records, 1980-2006," analyzed 550 confirmed data breach incidents between 1980 and 2006.

That amounts to about nine personal digital records compromised for every adult in the U.S. And it doesn't look like the pace is going to change anytime soon. There were more reported incidents in 2005 and 2006 than in the previous 25 years combined, although some of this can be explained by the increase in state breach notification laws that mandate businesses let their customers know when unencrypted personal information has been lost or stolen.

Most data breaches, 61%, can be attributed to "organizational mismanagement," a category that includes theft by insiders, the study concludes. Intrusions by malicious hackers made up 31% of the data breaches studied, with the cause of the remaining 8% of breaches not specified in the news reports studied.

Insider theft is the security problem that chief security officers most fear but have the most difficulty defending against. During the CSO Interchange forum held at this year's RSA Conference in San Francisco, 85 security chiefs from companies including Oracle, PayPal, and TransUnion were asked whether they deemed insiders or external attackers to be the greater threat. Sixty percent said it was the insiders that concerned them most. These concerns could only have been heightened by the news shortly after that DuPont scientist Gary Min stole $400 million worth of trade secrets from the chemical company and now faces up to 10 years in prison, a fine of $250,000, and restitution during his sentencing, which was rescheduled from March 29 to May 10.

The DuPont theft was entirely preventable, but "so many companies are so concerned with watching privileged IT users and employees of third-party outsourcers that they don't properly watch their regular user base," Buck French told me earlier this week. French is the chairman and CEO of Securify, a maker of network security appliances.

While he's got a vested interest in pointing out the dangers that employees can pose to their companies, I agree with his assertion that the insider theft problem will continue until companies devote the right resources to stopping it. "It's a couple years out before companies accelerate their efforts in this area," French said. "Financial institutions, for example, set aside a certain amount to deal with fraud. This says it's acceptable to us to lose a certain amount of money. It's a proxy for the acceptance of the problem."

As it turns out, fraud and identity theft -- some of the things that criminals do with the information that insiders steal -- is a whole other subject I'll be writing about extensively in the coming months. Until then, keep an ear out for unusual chatter around the water cooler and an eye on that guy in accounting whose been using the widowed account of one of your recently retired engineers to peek at your latest product designs.

Comment  | 
Print  | 
More Insights
Comments
Newest First  |  Oldest First  |  Threaded View
Commentary
Ransomware Is Not the Problem
Adam Shostack, Consultant, Entrepreneur, Technologist, Game Designer,  6/9/2021
Edge-DRsplash-11-edge-ask-the-experts
How Can I Test the Security of My Home-Office Employees' Routers?
John Bock, Senior Research Scientist,  6/7/2021
News
New Ransomware Group Claiming Connection to REvil Gang Surfaces
Jai Vijayan, Contributing Writer,  6/10/2021
Register for Dark Reading Newsletters
White Papers
Video
Cartoon
Current Issue
The State of Cybersecurity Incident Response
In this report learn how enterprises are building their incident response teams and processes, how they research potential compromises, how they respond to new breaches, and what tools and processes they use to remediate problems and improve their cyber defenses for the future.
Flash Poll
How Enterprises are Developing Secure Applications
How Enterprises are Developing Secure Applications
Recent breaches of third-party apps are driving many organizations to think harder about the security of their off-the-shelf software as they continue to move left in secure software development practices.
Twitter Feed
Dark Reading - Bug Report
Bug Report
Enterprise Vulnerabilities
From DHS/US-CERT's National Vulnerability Database
CVE-2021-0532
PUBLISHED: 2021-06-21
In memory management driver, there is a possible memory corruption due to a race condition. This could lead to local escalation of privilege with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation.Product: AndroidVersions: Android SoCAndroid ID: A-185196177
CVE-2021-0533
PUBLISHED: 2021-06-21
In memory management driver, there is a possible memory corruption due to a race condition. This could lead to local escalation of privilege with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation.Product: AndroidVersions: Android SoCAndroid ID: A-185193932
CVE-2021-26461
PUBLISHED: 2021-06-21
Apache Nuttx Versions prior to 10.1.0 are vulnerable to integer wrap-around in functions malloc, realloc and memalign. This improper memory assignment can lead to arbitrary memory allocation, resulting in unexpected behavior such as a crash or a remote code injection/execution.
CVE-2021-0478
PUBLISHED: 2021-06-21
In updateDrawable of StatusBarIconView.java, there is a possible permission bypass due to an uncaught exception. This could lead to local escalation of privilege by running foreground services without notifying the user, with User execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for explo...
CVE-2021-0504
PUBLISHED: 2021-06-21
In avrc_pars_browse_rsp of avrc_pars_ct.cc, there is a possible out of bounds read due to a missing bounds check. This could lead to remote information disclosure over Bluetooth with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation.Product: AndroidVersions: ...