Dark Reading is part of the Informa Tech Division of Informa PLC

This site is operated by a business or businesses owned by Informa PLC and all copyright resides with them.Informa PLC's registered office is 5 Howick Place, London SW1P 1WG. Registered in England and Wales. Number 8860726.

Risk

2/5/2010
12:55 PM
Keith Ferrell
Keith Ferrell
Commentary
50%
50%

Web App Scanners Missing Lots Of Vulnerabilities

Web application vulnerability scanners may miss as many as half the vulnerabilities, according to a researcher who found mounds of missed vulnerabilities and false positives, as well as laggardly performance.

Web application vulnerability scanners may miss as many as half the vulnerabilities, according to a researcher who found mounds of missed vulnerabilities and false positives, as well as laggardly performance.Researcher Larry Suto's Web app scanner exam put scanners Acunetix, IBM's AppScan, Portswigger.net BurpSuitePro, Cenzic's Hailstorm, HP's WebInspect, NT Objectives' NTOSpider, and Qualys' managed scanning service to the test.

The test included both "point-and-shoot" (get the scanner/launch the scanner) and then again after the scanner has been "trained" (manually tweaked and fine-tuned).

Not surprisingly, the scanners produced better results -- fewer false positives and missed vulnerabilities -- after training.

Suto's full findings and methodology are here.

App scanning, like any scan, can only go so far, and no matter how far that is, time-consuming human input (training and analysis, followed by more training and refinement) is an essential part of the process -- I'd say the essential part, and I'd best most of the developers would agree with me -- and likely the most expensive part of the process.

Vulnerability scans are becoming big business, and worthwhile business -- the best products get better constantly. But any vulnerability scan is a tricky thing to automate, and it's important to bear in mind that automation will -- and I think can -- only go so far. (That "so far" is, by the way, far less for Web app scanners, because of the nature and malleability of Web apps and the number of links they must crawl through.)

For these reasons alone, Suto's work --an earlier,and still well worth reading, look at Web app scanners is here (.zip file download) -- is important.

His work reminds us that vulnerability scanners are fine as far as they go, but that their operators -- your IT/security department or service vendor -- carry the real responsibility to build upon the scanners' efficiencies and make the tools truly effective for your business.

In other words, as with so many other things, once you've selected a product, it's all about your training and follow-through.

Comment  | 
Print  | 
More Insights
Comments
Newest First  |  Oldest First  |  Threaded View
News
Former CISA Director Chris Krebs Discusses Risk Management & Threat Intel
Kelly Sheridan, Staff Editor, Dark Reading,  2/23/2021
Edge-DRsplash-10-edge-articles
Security + Fraud Protection: Your One-Two Punch Against Cyberattacks
Joshua Goldfarb, Director of Product Management at F5,  2/23/2021
News
Cybercrime Groups More Prolific, Focus on Healthcare in 2020
Robert Lemos, Contributing Writer,  2/22/2021
Register for Dark Reading Newsletters
White Papers
Video
Cartoon Contest
Write a Caption, Win an Amazon Gift Card! Click Here
Latest Comment: This comment is waiting for review by our moderators.
Current Issue
2021 Top Enterprise IT Trends
We've identified the key trends that are poised to impact the IT landscape in 2021. Find out why they're important and how they will affect you today!
Flash Poll
Building the SOC of the Future
Building the SOC of the Future
Digital transformation, cloud-focused attacks, and a worldwide pandemic. The past year has changed the way business works and the way security teams operate. There is no going back.
Twitter Feed
Dark Reading - Bug Report
Bug Report
Enterprise Vulnerabilities
From DHS/US-CERT's National Vulnerability Database
CVE-2020-23534
PUBLISHED: 2021-02-25
A server-side request forgery (SSRF) vulnerability in Upgrade.php of gopeak masterlab 2.1.5, via the 'source' parameter.
CVE-2021-27330
PUBLISHED: 2021-02-25
Triconsole Datepicker Calendar <3.77 is affected by cross-site scripting (XSS) in calendar_form.php. Attackers can read authentication cookies that are still active, which can be used to perform further attacks such as reading browser history, directory listings, and file contents.
CVE-2021-3124
PUBLISHED: 2021-02-25
Stored cross-site scripting (XSS) in form field in robust.systems product Custom Global Variables v 1.0.5 allows a remote attacker to inject arbitrary code via the vars[0][name] field.
CVE-2021-21064
PUBLISHED: 2021-02-25
Magento UPWARD-php version 1.1.4 (and earlier) is affected by a Path traversal vulnerability in Magento UPWARD Connector version 1.1.2 (and earlier) due to the upload feature. An attacker could potentially exploit this vulnerability to upload a malicious YAML file that can contain instructions which...
CVE-2021-21065
PUBLISHED: 2021-02-25
Adobe Bridge version 11.0 (and earlier) is affected by an out-of-bounds write vulnerability when parsing TTF files that could result in arbitrary code execution in the context of the current user. Exploitation of this issue requires user interaction in that a victim must open a malicious file.