Dark Reading is part of the Informa Tech Division of Informa PLC

This site is operated by a business or businesses owned by Informa PLC and all copyright resides with them.Informa PLC's registered office is 5 Howick Place, London SW1P 1WG. Registered in England and Wales. Number 8860726.

Risk

2/5/2010
12:55 PM
Keith Ferrell
Keith Ferrell
Commentary
50%
50%

Web App Scanners Missing Lots Of Vulnerabilities

Web application vulnerability scanners may miss as many as half the vulnerabilities, according to a researcher who found mounds of missed vulnerabilities and false positives, as well as laggardly performance.

Web application vulnerability scanners may miss as many as half the vulnerabilities, according to a researcher who found mounds of missed vulnerabilities and false positives, as well as laggardly performance.Researcher Larry Suto's Web app scanner exam put scanners Acunetix, IBM's AppScan, Portswigger.net BurpSuitePro, Cenzic's Hailstorm, HP's WebInspect, NT Objectives' NTOSpider, and Qualys' managed scanning service to the test.

The test included both "point-and-shoot" (get the scanner/launch the scanner) and then again after the scanner has been "trained" (manually tweaked and fine-tuned).

Not surprisingly, the scanners produced better results -- fewer false positives and missed vulnerabilities -- after training.

Suto's full findings and methodology are here.

App scanning, like any scan, can only go so far, and no matter how far that is, time-consuming human input (training and analysis, followed by more training and refinement) is an essential part of the process -- I'd say the essential part, and I'd best most of the developers would agree with me -- and likely the most expensive part of the process.

Vulnerability scans are becoming big business, and worthwhile business -- the best products get better constantly. But any vulnerability scan is a tricky thing to automate, and it's important to bear in mind that automation will -- and I think can -- only go so far. (That "so far" is, by the way, far less for Web app scanners, because of the nature and malleability of Web apps and the number of links they must crawl through.)

For these reasons alone, Suto's work --an earlier,and still well worth reading, look at Web app scanners is here (.zip file download) -- is important.

His work reminds us that vulnerability scanners are fine as far as they go, but that their operators -- your IT/security department or service vendor -- carry the real responsibility to build upon the scanners' efficiencies and make the tools truly effective for your business.

In other words, as with so many other things, once you've selected a product, it's all about your training and follow-through.

Comment  | 
Print  | 
More Insights
Comments
Newest First  |  Oldest First  |  Threaded View
Commentary
Ransomware Is Not the Problem
Adam Shostack, Consultant, Entrepreneur, Technologist, Game Designer,  6/9/2021
Edge-DRsplash-11-edge-ask-the-experts
How Can I Test the Security of My Home-Office Employees' Routers?
John Bock, Senior Research Scientist,  6/7/2021
News
New Ransomware Group Claiming Connection to REvil Gang Surfaces
Jai Vijayan, Contributing Writer,  6/10/2021
Register for Dark Reading Newsletters
White Papers
Video
Cartoon Contest
Write a Caption, Win an Amazon Gift Card! Click Here
Latest Comment: This gives a new meaning to blind leading the blind.
Current Issue
The State of Cybersecurity Incident Response
In this report learn how enterprises are building their incident response teams and processes, how they research potential compromises, how they respond to new breaches, and what tools and processes they use to remediate problems and improve their cyber defenses for the future.
Flash Poll
How Enterprises are Developing Secure Applications
How Enterprises are Developing Secure Applications
Recent breaches of third-party apps are driving many organizations to think harder about the security of their off-the-shelf software as they continue to move left in secure software development practices.
Twitter Feed
Dark Reading - Bug Report
Bug Report
Enterprise Vulnerabilities
From DHS/US-CERT's National Vulnerability Database
CVE-2021-28815
PUBLISHED: 2021-06-16
Insecure storage of sensitive information has been reported to affect QNAP NAS running myQNAPcloud Link. If exploited, this vulnerability allows remote attackers to read sensitive information by accessing the unrestricted storage mechanism. This issue affects: QNAP Systems Inc. myQNAPcloud Link vers...
CVE-2021-3535
PUBLISHED: 2021-06-16
Rapid7 Nexpose is vulnerable to a non-persistent cross-site scripting vulnerability affecting the Security Console's Filtered Asset Search feature. A specific search criterion and operator combination in Filtered Asset Search could have allowed a user to pass code through the provided search field. ...
CVE-2021-32685
PUBLISHED: 2021-06-16
tEnvoy contains the PGP, NaCl, and PBKDF2 in node.js and the browser (hashing, random, encryption, decryption, signatures, conversions), used by TogaTech.org. In versions prior to 7.0.3, the `verifyWithMessage` method of `tEnvoyNaClSigningKey` always returns `true` for any signature that has a SHA-5...
CVE-2021-32623
PUBLISHED: 2021-06-16
Opencast is a free and open source solution for automated video capture and distribution. Versions of Opencast prior to 9.6 are vulnerable to the billion laughs attack, which allows an attacker to easily execute a (seemingly permanent) denial of service attack, essentially taking down Opencast using...
CVE-2021-32676
PUBLISHED: 2021-06-16
Nextcloud Talk is a fully on-premises audio/video and chat communication service. Password protected shared chats in Talk before version 9.0.10, 10.0.8 and 11.2.2 did not rotate the session cookie after a successful authentication event. It is recommended that the Nextcloud Talk App is upgraded to 9...