Dark Reading is part of the Informa Tech Division of Informa PLC

This site is operated by a business or businesses owned by Informa PLC and all copyright resides with them.Informa PLC's registered office is 5 Howick Place, London SW1P 1WG. Registered in England and Wales. Number 8860726.

Risk

8/27/2008
02:51 PM
Connect Directly
Google+
LinkedIn
Twitter
RSS
E-Mail
50%
50%

The 'Poor Man's Traffic Intercept'

A weakness in the Border Gateway Protocol makes the Internet's core infrastructure look about as watertight as a screen door.

So you want to intercept Internet traffic? If the National Security Agency is too busy to help out, you could always exploit a weakness in the Border Gateway Protocol that was demonstrated at the DEFCON security conference earlier this month.

As explained by Wired's Kim Zetter, it's possible to conduct a man-in-the-middle attack that exploits the shortcomings of BGP to cause a router to redirect network traffic.

To understand the impact of such redirection, rewind to February, when Pakistan's attempt to censor YouTube caused collateral damage to Internet traffic routing that spread to PCCW, an ISP based in Hong Kong, and from there to other servers across the globe. The result was that YouTube was inaccessible around the world.

However, this kind of traffic redirection can be done without breaking anything. The technique demonstrated by Anton Kapela, data center and network director at 5Nines Data, and Alex Pilosov, CEO of Pilosoft, could be done discreetly, without creating a major outage that everyone would notice.

As Kapela explained in a message sent to the North American Network Operators Group mailing list, "In a nutshell, we demonstrated that current lack of secure filtering infrastructure not only permits [denial of service]-like attacks, but also full 'traffic monitoring' of arbitrary prefixes from essentially anywhere in the world."

In a blog post, Danny McPherson, chief research officer at Arbor Networks, wrote, "[Y]ou could liken this to a poor man's traffic intercept." Most governments and intelligence agencies, he suggested, don't need to do this because they can intercept network traffic at a lower-level network layer.

Viewed in conjunction with the DNS vulnerability that security researcher Dan Kaminsky disclosed at the Black Hat conference earlier this month, the Internet's core infrastructure looks about as watertight as a screen door.

This isn't a new problem. Government and academic networking researchers have known about this and related issues for years. Sites like the Internet Alert Registry and the Prefix Hijack Alert System represent an attempt to identify potential attempts to hijack Internet traffic. And projects like Secure Inter-Domain Routing and Resource PKI offer potential fixes.

In February, when Pakistan brought renewed attention to the issue, Steve Bellovin, a Columbia University computer science professor, posted a message to the NANOG list in which he observed that the Internet technical community has been warning about routing problems like this. He called for deployment of S-BGP, a more secure version of the routing protocol, despite deployment and operational issues that still need to be resolved.

"The question is this: when is the pain from routing incidents great enough that we're forced to act?" Bellovin wrote. "It would have been nice to have done something before this, since now all the world's script kiddies have seen what can be done."

McPherson sees information presented by Kapela and Pilosoft more as the novel expansion of a longstanding vulnerability rather than the revelation of a major hole in the Internet. But he said that renewed attention to BGP's problems "should serve as a reminder for folks that if you have any expectations of transaction privacy on the Internet, you should be employing end-end encryption (e.g., IPSEC)."

Managing risk is the top security issue facing IT professionals, according to the 2008 InformationWeek Strategic Security Survey. The survey of 2,000 IT professionals also found that IT is years behind other disciplines in adopting systematic risk management processes. You can learn more about the InformationWeek Strategic Security Survey by downloading an InformationWeek Analytics report here (registration required).

Comment  | 
Print  | 
More Insights
Comments
Threaded  |  Newest First  |  Oldest First
COVID-19: Latest Security News & Commentary
Dark Reading Staff 6/3/2020
Data Loss Spikes Under COVID-19 Lockdowns
Seth Rosenblatt, Contributing Writer,  5/28/2020
Abandoned Apps May Pose Security Risk to Mobile Devices
Robert Lemos, Contributing Writer,  5/29/2020
Register for Dark Reading Newsletters
White Papers
Video
Cartoon Contest
Write a Caption, Win a Starbucks Card! Click Here
Latest Comment: This comment is waiting for review by our moderators.
Current Issue
How Cybersecurity Incident Response Programs Work (and Why Some Don't)
This Tech Digest takes a look at the vital role cybersecurity incident response (IR) plays in managing cyber-risk within organizations. Download the Tech Digest today to find out how well-planned IR programs can detect intrusions, contain breaches, and help an organization restore normal operations.
Flash Poll
Twitter Feed
Dark Reading - Bug Report
Bug Report
Enterprise Vulnerabilities
From DHS/US-CERT's National Vulnerability Database
CVE-2020-13777
PUBLISHED: 2020-06-04
GnuTLS 3.6.x before 3.6.14 uses incorrect cryptography for encrypting a session ticket (a loss of confidentiality in TLS 1.2, and an authentication bypass in TLS 1.3). The earliest affected version is 3.6.4 (2018-09-24) because of an error in a 2018-09-18 commit. Until the first key rotation, the TL...
CVE-2020-10548
PUBLISHED: 2020-06-04
rConfig 3.9.4 and previous versions has unauthenticated devices.inc.php SQL injection. Because, by default, nodes' passwords are stored in cleartext, this vulnerability leads to lateral movement, granting an attacker access to monitored network devices.
CVE-2020-10549
PUBLISHED: 2020-06-04
rConfig 3.9.4 and previous versions has unauthenticated snippets.inc.php SQL injection. Because, by default, nodes' passwords are stored in cleartext, this vulnerability leads to lateral movement, granting an attacker access to monitored network devices.
CVE-2020-10546
PUBLISHED: 2020-06-04
rConfig 3.9.4 and previous versions has unauthenticated compliancepolicies.inc.php SQL injection. Because, by default, nodes' passwords are stored in cleartext, this vulnerability leads to lateral movement, granting an attacker access to monitored network devices.
CVE-2020-10547
PUBLISHED: 2020-06-04
rConfig 3.9.4 and previous versions has unauthenticated compliancepolicyelements.inc.php SQL injection. Because, by default, nodes' passwords are stored in cleartext, this vulnerability leads to lateral movement, granting an attacker access to monitored network devices.