Risk

8/5/2010
04:54 PM
Connect Directly
Twitter
LinkedIn
RSS
E-Mail
50%
50%

The Browser As Attack Vector

Beginning with the Web 2.0 boom and accelerating with today's popular SaaS model, new attack techniques are exploiting browser flaws and leading to the compromise of data.

`For years, we groused about bug-ridden browsers while initiatives to harden them largely fell flat. Then one day, IT woke up to find that the browser is the new OS. Web 2.0 applications use browsers and the public Internet to create interactive interfaces and enable asynchronous collaboration, inside and outside the firewall. Google Chrome is promising to push Web-based operating systems forward, which could let businesses cut costs and infrastructure.

All types of companies are moving toward software as a service at a steady clip--55% of the strategic IT managers responding to our June InformationWeek Analytics Cloud Computing & IT Staffing Survey of 828 IT professionals are using SaaS or plan to. What all that means is, the browser is now your employees' gateway out--and an attacker's gateway in. IT must focus on protecting the browser from compromise without hindering functionality and derailing business initiatives in the process.

If you read "protect the business" as "patch servers, add rules to the firewall, and apply system configurations," you're asking to be breached. Browser-based attacks are a significant challenge, for a few reasons. They're unpredictable. IT doesn't always know where a user will need to go on the Internet, what services need to be accessed, and when. This makes defense by tightly limiting where employees may surf very difficult. User errors are often factors in successful exploits. And attackers are smart and resourceful and frequently compromise seemingly innocuous sites. All the monitoring and training in the world may not make a whit of difference.

What does matter: Putting in place a comprehensive protective strategy that's both proactive and reactive.

Browser Blitzkrieg

What's that? You're having trouble getting funding for the security initiatives already in place, never mind a new program? Then some education is in order, because browser-based attacks are at your doorstep. We've seen real-world examples: The New York Times last September was found to be serving malware through a third-party online advertisement network. The attack against Google in China, nicknamed Operation Aurora, is believed to have utilized a zero-day, or previously unknown, flaw targeting Internet Explorer.

Attacks against, or via, the browser vary in type and sophistication. The most basic simply ask the user to download a malicious file disguised as something legitimate. As users become more savvy, they fall for these attacks less and less. More sophisticated attacks involve directing people to malicious sites through links placed in the comment or advertisement sections of legitimate sites. Once the user visits the malicious site, code is loaded automatically that attempts to exploit security holes in the browser, or a browser plug-in, such as Flash Player. These attacks are called "drive-by downloads," and even wary end users can be fooled.

InformationWeek: Aug. 9, 2010 Issue To read the rest of the article, download a free PDF of InformationWeek magazine
(registration required)



Become an InformationWeek Analytics subscriber: $99 per person per month, multiseat discounts available. Subscribe and get our full report on browser security .

This report includes 14 pages of action-oriented analysis.

What you'll find:
  • Detailed information on ways to protect data from attacks entering through browsers
  • Analysis of the effect growing use of SaaS has on browser choice--and security
  • Why Web filtering is more important now than ever
Get This And All Our Reports

Comment  | 
Print  | 
More Insights
Comments
Newest First  |  Oldest First  |  Threaded View
Devastating Cyberattack on Email Provider Destroys 18 Years of Data
Jai Vijayan, Freelance writer,  2/12/2019
Up to 100,000 Reported Affected in Landmark White Data Breach
Kelly Sheridan, Staff Editor, Dark Reading,  2/12/2019
Register for Dark Reading Newsletters
White Papers
Video
Cartoon
Current Issue
5 Emerging Cyber Threats to Watch for in 2019
Online attackers are constantly developing new, innovative ways to break into the enterprise. This Dark Reading Tech Digest gives an in-depth look at five emerging attack trends and exploits your security team should look out for, along with helpful recommendations on how you can prevent your organization from falling victim.
Flash Poll
How Enterprises Are Attacking the Cybersecurity Problem
How Enterprises Are Attacking the Cybersecurity Problem
Data breach fears and the need to comply with regulations such as GDPR are two major drivers increased spending on security products and technologies. But other factors are contributing to the trend as well. Find out more about how enterprises are attacking the cybersecurity problem by reading our report today.
Twitter Feed
Dark Reading - Bug Report
Bug Report
Enterprise Vulnerabilities
From DHS/US-CERT's National Vulnerability Database
CVE-2019-8354
PUBLISHED: 2019-02-15
An issue was discovered in SoX 14.4.2. lsx_make_lpf in effect_i_dsp.c has an integer overflow on the result of multiplication fed into malloc. When the buffer is allocated, it is smaller than expected, leading to a heap-based buffer overflow.
CVE-2019-8355
PUBLISHED: 2019-02-15
An issue was discovered in SoX 14.4.2. In xmalloc.h, there is an integer overflow on the result of multiplication fed into the lsx_valloc macro that wraps malloc. When the buffer is allocated, it is smaller than expected, leading to a heap-based buffer overflow in channels_start in remix.c.
CVE-2019-8356
PUBLISHED: 2019-02-15
An issue was discovered in SoX 14.4.2. One of the arguments to bitrv2 in fft4g.c is not guarded, such that it can lead to write access outside of the statically declared array, aka a stack-based buffer overflow.
CVE-2019-8357
PUBLISHED: 2019-02-15
An issue was discovered in SoX 14.4.2. lsx_make_lpf in effect_i_dsp.c allows a NULL pointer dereference.
CVE-2013-2516
PUBLISHED: 2019-02-15
Vulnerability in FileUtils v0.7, Ruby Gem Fileutils <= v0.7 Command Injection vulnerability in user supplied url variable that is passed to the shell.