Dark Reading is part of the Informa Tech Division of Informa PLC

This site is operated by a business or businesses owned by Informa PLC and all copyright resides with them.Informa PLC's registered office is 5 Howick Place, London SW1P 1WG. Registered in England and Wales. Number 8860726.

Risk

7/11/2009
08:16 PM
George V. Hulme
George V. Hulme
Commentary
50%
50%

Target Requires Driver's License Scan For Restricted Items

Sure, I traded my smoking habit for a Nicorette gum habit, but does that mean I should be forced to have my driver's license physically swiped through the register to buy an age restricted item? I don't think so, but retailing giant Target certainly does.

Sure, I traded my smoking habit for a Nicorette gum habit, but does that mean I should be forced to have my driver's license physically swiped through the register to buy an age restricted item? I don't think so, but retailing giant Target certainly does.Almost exactly one year ago I went to a Target store to pick up a box of Nicorette gum, which I needed in a hurry. When at the register, the clerk asked to see my driver's license to verify age. Much to my shock at the time, rather than just check my age, the clerk swiped the magnetic strip through the register. When I asked what data was captured, she couldn't answer. Not good. I blogged about the incident here, and followed up here (after Target called to assure me that only date-of-birth information is captured from the magnetic strip.).

Since that time, I've hardly bought any age restricted items at Target, but the few times I have, my simply telling the clerk my age and showing the card, without actually letting them scan it, sufficed. It was typically a hassle I tried to avoid, as neither close-by CVS or Walgreens are so pestering on the matter.

Today was different as the Target clerk informed me that just presenting the license was no longer good enough and that: The new system requires that the driver's license actually be scanned.

I don't think so. I mean, really, I have an easier time buying liqueur at the state store than nicotine-laced gum at Target.

Despite Target's assurance that only the date-of-birth is captured, I'm not allowing them to physically scan my driver's license. The strip on that license contains name, address, phone number, date-of-birth, eye color, hair color, weight, driving restrictions, and driver's license number. That's just too much data to put at risk.

Besides, how do you know that any given retailer (not just Target) doesn't change their policy and start collecting your address, your phone number, and whatever else they want? What do they do with it? Would they sell it? Too many questions, and once your data is collected, it's out of your control.

What's more, if history is any indication, when retailers' -- or any organization for that matter -- find their financial situation in dire straights one of the first things to go out the window are their privacy policies. They'll sell whatever they can to stay afloat, keep creditors at bay, or avoid or finance their bankruptcy. The most recent example is the failure of Clear -- those who used the service still don't know for sure how their data will be used, or if it will be destroyed. Forrester's Andrew Jaquith has an excellent post, TSA's Muddy Response to the Clear Shutdown, that is worth a read.

That's why, whenever a retailer asks to swipe my driver's license, the answer is no and the product is going back to the shelve. They're doing their own CYA at the expense of yours.

 

Recommended Reading:

Comment  | 
Print  | 
More Insights
Comments
Newest First  |  Oldest First  |  Threaded View
COVID-19: Latest Security News & Commentary
Dark Reading Staff 8/10/2020
Pen Testers Who Got Arrested Doing Their Jobs Tell All
Kelly Jackson Higgins, Executive Editor at Dark Reading,  8/5/2020
Researcher Finds New Office Macro Attacks for MacOS
Curtis Franklin Jr., Senior Editor at Dark Reading,  8/7/2020
Register for Dark Reading Newsletters
White Papers
Video
Cartoon Contest
Current Issue
Special Report: Computing's New Normal, a Dark Reading Perspective
This special report examines how IT security organizations have adapted to the "new normal" of computing and what the long-term effects will be. Read it and get a unique set of perspectives on issues ranging from new threats & vulnerabilities as a result of remote working to how enterprise security strategy will be affected long term.
Flash Poll
The Changing Face of Threat Intelligence
The Changing Face of Threat Intelligence
This special report takes a look at how enterprises are using threat intelligence, as well as emerging best practices for integrating threat intel into security operations and incident response. Download it today!
Twitter Feed
Dark Reading - Bug Report
Bug Report
Enterprise Vulnerabilities
From DHS/US-CERT's National Vulnerability Database
CVE-2020-13295
PUBLISHED: 2020-08-10
For GitLab Runner before 13.0.12, 13.1.6, 13.2.3, by replacing dockerd with a malicious server, the Shared Runner is susceptible to SSRF.
CVE-2020-6070
PUBLISHED: 2020-08-10
An exploitable code execution vulnerability exists in the file system checking functionality of fsck.f2fs 1.12.0. A specially crafted f2fs file can cause a logic flaw and out-of-bounds heap operations, resulting in code execution. An attacker can provide a malicious file to trigger this vulnerabilit...
CVE-2020-6145
PUBLISHED: 2020-08-10
An SQL injection vulnerability exists in the frappe.desk.reportview.get functionality of ERPNext 11.1.38. A specially crafted HTTP request can cause an SQL injection. An attacker can make an authenticated HTTP request to trigger this vulnerability.
CVE-2020-8224
PUBLISHED: 2020-08-10
A code injection in Nextcloud Desktop Client 2.6.4 allowed to load arbitrary code when placing a malicious OpenSSL config into a fixed directory.
CVE-2020-8229
PUBLISHED: 2020-08-10
A memory leak in the OCUtil.dll library used by Nextcloud Desktop Client 2.6.4 can lead to a DoS against the host system.