Dark Reading is part of the Informa Tech Division of Informa PLC

This site is operated by a business or businesses owned by Informa PLC and all copyright resides with them.Informa PLC's registered office is 5 Howick Place, London SW1P 1WG. Registered in England and Wales. Number 8860726.

Risk

10/15/2007
03:47 PM
Thomas Claburn
Thomas Claburn
Commentary
Connect Directly
Google+
LinkedIn
Twitter
RSS
E-Mail
50%
50%

Symantec To Buy Vontu?

Symantec may be close to announcing the acquisition of Vontu, a company that helps businesses control information on their networks. Given that Symentec already licenses Vontu's data loss prevention technology, the rumored deal isn't entirely unexpected.

Symantec may be close to announcing the acquisition of Vontu, a company that helps businesses control information on their networks.

Given that Symentec already licenses Vontu's data loss prevention technology, the rumored deal isn't entirely unexpected.Though Symantec declined to comment on reports of the acquisition, two of Vontu's competitors in the DLP space -- Proofpoint and Tizor Systems -- issued comments via e-mail to say that the presumed deal validated the importance of data protection.

The same can be said about McAfee's purchases of Onigma, a maker of data loss prevention software, last year for $20 million, and of SafeBoot B.V., a maker of enterprise data protection products, last week for $350 million.

Both those deals suggest a future for data protection products.

As if the past weren't enough: According to the Privacy Rights Clearinghouse, more than 167 million records have been compromised by data breaches since the start of 2005.

The loss of some 46 million credit and debit card numbers, disclosed earlier this year, from TJX, parent company of retailers TJ Maxx and Marshall's, and the subsequent fraud arising from use of some of that data, has been widely cited by those arguing for stronger data protection technology and laws.

Yet over the weekend, Gov. Schwarzenegger of California vetoed AB 779, the Consumer Data Protection Act, which would have required organizations responsible for data breaches, if they do business in California, to pay for the costs of notifying consumers.

Nonetheless, Schwarzenegger expressed support for data protection in principle, if not as spelled out in the proposed law. "Protecting the personal information of every Californian is very important to me and I am committed to strong laws that safeguard every individual's privacy and prevent identity theft," he said in a letter to the California State Assembly explaining his veto. "Clearly, the need to protect personal information is increasingly critical as routine commercial transactions are more and more exclusively accomplished through electronic means."

Comment  | 
Print  | 
More Insights
Comments
Newest First  |  Oldest First  |  Threaded View
DevSecOps: The Answer to the Cloud Security Skills Gap
Lamont Orange, Chief Information Security Officer at Netskope,  11/15/2019
Attackers' Costs Increasing as Businesses Focus on Security
Robert Lemos, Contributing Writer,  11/15/2019
TPM-Fail: What It Means & What to Do About It
Ari Singer, CTO at TrustPhi,  11/19/2019
Register for Dark Reading Newsletters
White Papers
Video
Cartoon Contest
Write a Caption, Win a Starbucks Card! Click Here
Latest Comment: -when I told you that our cyber-defense was from another age
Current Issue
Navigating the Deluge of Security Data
In this Tech Digest, Dark Reading shares the experiences of some top security practitioners as they navigate volumes of security data. We examine some examples of how enterprises can cull this data to find the clues they need.
Flash Poll
Rethinking Enterprise Data Defense
Rethinking Enterprise Data Defense
Frustrated with recurring intrusions and breaches, cybersecurity professionals are questioning some of the industrys conventional wisdom. Heres a look at what theyre thinking about.
Twitter Feed
Dark Reading - Bug Report
Bug Report
Enterprise Vulnerabilities
From DHS/US-CERT's National Vulnerability Database
CVE-2019-18858
PUBLISHED: 2019-11-20
CODESYS 3 web server before 3.5.15.20, as distributed with CODESYS Control runtime systems, has a Buffer Overflow.
CVE-2019-3466
PUBLISHED: 2019-11-20
The pg_ctlcluster script in postgresql-common in versions prior to 210 didn't drop privileges when creating socket/statistics temporary directories, which could result in local privilege escalation.
CVE-2010-4659
PUBLISHED: 2019-11-20
Cross-site scripting (XSS) vulnerability in statusnet through 2010 in error message contents.
CVE-2019-4530
PUBLISHED: 2019-11-20
IBM Maximo Asset Management 7.6, 7.6.1, and 7.6.1.1 could allow an authenticated user to delete a record that they should not normally be able to. IBM X-Force ID: 165586.
CVE-2019-4561
PUBLISHED: 2019-11-20
IBM Security Identity Manager 6.0.0 could allow a remote attacker to execute arbitrary code on the system, caused by the deserialization of untrusted data. By persuading a victim to visit a specially crafted Web site, an attacker could exploit this vulnerability to execute arbitrary code on the syst...