Dark Reading is part of the Informa Tech Division of Informa PLC

This site is operated by a business or businesses owned by Informa PLC and all copyright resides with them.Informa PLC's registered office is 5 Howick Place, London SW1P 1WG. Registered in England and Wales. Number 8860726.

Risk

9/24/2009
06:52 PM
George V. Hulme
George V. Hulme
Commentary
50%
50%

Survey Says: PCI DSS Compliance Not Strategic

That's right. A survey conducted by the Ponemon Institute, and backed by security firm Imperva, says that the vast majority of firms don't view the Payment Card Industry Data Security Standard (PCI DSS) as a strategic initiative.

That's right. A survey conducted by the Ponemon Institute, and backed by security firm Imperva, says that the vast majority of firms don't view the Payment Card Industry Data Security Standard (PCI DSS) as a strategic initiative.The question is why? Why don't companies that handle credit card information view security as a strategic priority? There are a couple reasons that come immediately to mind. First, it's hard work and requires persistence. Second, good security doesn't increase market share: consumers don't reward companies when nothing bad happens. Third, many companies simply don't believe the worst will happen to them. Or, even if they do, they figure they'll handle the cost of the breach and move on.

The survey (registration required) included more than 500 U.S.-based and multinational firms. And, with the average annual revenue of survey respondents at $5.6 billion, the survey was not filled with small businesses that one would expect to be strapped. Nevertheless, the survey found that 71% of respondents said that their company does not treat PCI DSS as a strategic initiative.

The kicker: 79% of this very same group has experienced a data breach that involved the loss or theft of credit card information.

That data hints that incurring the cost of a breach is cheaper than protecting systems and data. So does the finding that 60% of respondents don't think they have sufficient resources to comply with PCI DSS or to reach a necessary level of cardholder security.

I found that last data point especially troubling. The digital infrastructure is a crucial part of modern supply and delivery chain. And it needs to be maintained to be both sustainable, and secure, or it will break down. This should have nothing to do with regulatory compliance - but it does. Move away from heavily regulated companies and the attitude toward security gets more complacent.

They're simply not investing in the technology or the people necessary to manage risk properly.

So what happens when security isn't treated as a "strategic initiative" by a broad swath of the business community? You get what we have today, and that's the near daily news reports of credit card, financial, and other personal data being breached.

The sad fact is that PCI DSS compliance should be considered a security baseline -- not the ultimate objective, which would be a secure infrastructure. It seems many companies, most in fact, aren't even willing to make the investment required to hit bare minimum.

Follow me on Twitter, @georgevhulme

Comment  | 
Print  | 
More Insights
Comments
Threaded  |  Newest First  |  Oldest First
COVID-19: Latest Security News & Commentary
Dark Reading Staff 4/7/2020
The Coronavirus & Cybersecurity: 3 Areas of Exploitation
Robert R. Ackerman Jr., Founder & Managing Director, Allegis Capital,  4/7/2020
Register for Dark Reading Newsletters
White Papers
Video
Cartoon Contest
Write a Caption, Win a Starbucks Card! Click Here
Latest Comment: This comment is waiting for review by our moderators.
Current Issue
6 Emerging Cyber Threats That Enterprises Face in 2020
This Tech Digest gives an in-depth look at six emerging cyber threats that enterprises could face in 2020. Download your copy today!
Flash Poll
State of Cybersecurity Incident Response
State of Cybersecurity Incident Response
Data breaches and regulations have forced organizations to pay closer attention to the security incident response function. However, security leaders may be overestimating their ability to detect and respond to security incidents. Read this report to find out more.
Twitter Feed
Dark Reading - Bug Report
Bug Report
Enterprise Vulnerabilities
From DHS/US-CERT's National Vulnerability Database
CVE-2020-1990
PUBLISHED: 2020-04-08
A stack-based buffer overflow vulnerability in the management server component of PAN-OS allows an authenticated user to upload a corrupted PAN-OS configuration and potentially execute code with root privileges. This issue affects Palo Alto Networks PAN-OS 8.1 versions before 8.1.13; 9.0 versions be...
CVE-2020-1991
PUBLISHED: 2020-04-08
An insecure temporary file vulnerability in Palo Alto Networks Traps allows a local authenticated Windows user to escalate privileges or overwrite system files. This issue affects Palo Alto Networks Traps 5.0 versions before 5.0.8; 6.1 versions before 6.1.4 on Windows. This issue does not affect Cor...
CVE-2020-1992
PUBLISHED: 2020-04-08
A format string vulnerability in the Varrcvr daemon of PAN-OS on PA-7000 Series devices with a Log Forwarding Card (LFC) allows remote attackers to crash the daemon creating a denial of service condition or potentially execute code with root privileges. This issue affects Palo Alto Networks PAN-OS 9...
CVE-2020-10978
PUBLISHED: 2020-04-08
GitLab EE/CE 8.11 to 12.9 is leaking information on Issues opened in a public project and then moved to a private project through Web-UI and GraphQL API.
CVE-2020-10979
PUBLISHED: 2020-04-08
GitLab EE/CE 11.10 to 12.9 is leaking information on restricted CI pipelines metrics to unauthorized users.