Dark Reading is part of the Informa Tech Division of Informa PLC

This site is operated by a business or businesses owned by Informa PLC and all copyright resides with them.Informa PLC's registered office is 5 Howick Place, London SW1P 1WG. Registered in England and Wales. Number 8860726.

Risk

8/27/2008
03:53 PM
Connect Directly
Google+
LinkedIn
Twitter
RSS
E-Mail
50%
50%

Spammers Use 'Hijacked' Babies To Lure Victims

The social engineering campaign includes an attached file, purportedly a photo of the recipient's child, but which is, of course, malware.

As part of their ongoing experiments to see which outlandish claims can dupe e-mail recipients into opening malicious messages, spammers have apparently taken to ransoming babies.

As noted by researchers at message security company Sophos, spammers have launched a social engineering campaign in which the sender claims to have "hijacked" the recipient's baby.

"We have hijacked your baby but you must pay once to us $50,000," the ransom message says, with a sentence structure that suggests further study of English grammar might be warranted. "The details we will send later..."

The attached file, purportedly a photo of the recipient's child, is, of course, malware. Sophos identifies it as Troj/Resex-Fam.

"There's no other way of putting it -- this attack is sick," wrote Graham Cluley, senior technology consultant for Sophos, in an online post. "Hackers have no qualms about exploiting a family's natural instinct to defend its most vulnerable members. Hopefully people will pause before opening the attachment, but the reflex action of some may be to click first and think later."

This is not the first time online scammers have resorted to such tactics. In February, the FBI reiterated previous warnings about a long-standing spam campaign that threatens the recipient with death if payment isn't made. The threat, said the FBI, is a hoax.

That's not to say extortion and kidnapping aren't real problems. In many parts of the world, like Mexico, such crimes regularly make the headlines. But people making general threats via e-mail, without any reference to the recipient's identity or circumstances, are probably more interested in stealing personal information than infants.

Comment  | 
Print  | 
More Insights
Comments
Newest First  |  Oldest First  |  Threaded View
For Cybersecurity to Be Proactive, Terrains Must Be Mapped
Craig Harber, Chief Technology Officer at Fidelis Cybersecurity,  10/8/2019
A Realistic Threat Model for the Masses
Lysa Myers, Security Researcher, ESET,  10/9/2019
USB Drive Security Still Lags
Dark Reading Staff 10/9/2019
Register for Dark Reading Newsletters
White Papers
Video
Cartoon Contest
Current Issue
7 Threats & Disruptive Forces Changing the Face of Cybersecurity
This Dark Reading Tech Digest gives an in-depth look at the biggest emerging threats and disruptive forces that are changing the face of cybersecurity today.
Flash Poll
2019 Online Malware and Threats
2019 Online Malware and Threats
As cyberattacks become more frequent and more sophisticated, enterprise security teams are under unprecedented pressure to respond. Is your organization ready?
Twitter Feed
Dark Reading - Bug Report
Bug Report
Enterprise Vulnerabilities
From DHS/US-CERT's National Vulnerability Database
CVE-2019-17545
PUBLISHED: 2019-10-14
GDAL through 3.0.1 has a poolDestroy double free in OGRExpatRealloc in ogr/ogr_expat.cpp when the 10MB threshold is exceeded.
CVE-2019-17546
PUBLISHED: 2019-10-14
tif_getimage.c in LibTIFF through 4.0.10, as used in GDAL through 3.0.1 and other products, has an integer overflow that potentially causes a heap-based buffer overflow via a crafted RGBA image, related to a "Negative-size-param" condition.
CVE-2019-17547
PUBLISHED: 2019-10-14
In ImageMagick before 7.0.8-62, TraceBezier in MagickCore/draw.c has a use-after-free.
CVE-2019-17501
PUBLISHED: 2019-10-14
Centreon 19.04 allows attackers to execute arbitrary OS commands via the Command Line field of main.php?p=60807&type=4 (aka the Configuration > Commands > Discovery screen).
CVE-2019-17539
PUBLISHED: 2019-10-14
In FFmpeg before 4.2, avcodec_open2 in libavcodec/utils.c allows a NULL pointer dereference and possibly unspecified other impact when there is no valid close function pointer.