Dark Reading is part of the Informa Tech Division of Informa PLC

This site is operated by a business or businesses owned by Informa PLC and all copyright resides with them.Informa PLC's registered office is 5 Howick Place, London SW1P 1WG. Registered in England and Wales. Number 8860726.

Risk

10/14/2009
08:52 AM
Keith Ferrell
Keith Ferrell
Commentary
50%
50%

Sidekick Failure Highlights Security Demands Cloud Customers Must Make

Whether or not Sidekick recovers from the data debacle that may have cost hundreds of thousands of customers their cloud-stored material, the disaster shows into sharp relief a couple of great and greatly unasked questions about doing business in and with the cloud: How confident can you be of your cloud service providers? How confident should you insist on being?

Whether or not Sidekick recovers from the data debacle that may have cost hundreds of thousands of customers their cloud-stored material, the disaster shows into sharp relief a couple of great and greatly unasked questions about doing business in and with the cloud: How confident can you be of your cloud service providers? How confident should you insist on being?The Microsoft/T-Mobile Sidekick data meltdown that may have wiped out contact and other information for a million or so customers raises some questions that I suspect we'll be hearing frequently in the weeks and months ahead.

How confident can you be that your cloud service provider is fully attentive to the protection of your data and its restoration -- not just to the provision of the service you signed up for?

Now, clearly, things happen -- there's no such as 100% foolproof.

Just as clearly, though, neither Microsoft nor T-Mobile are exactly small companies. Surely as they worked out the deal to provide Sidekick sync-storage via Microsoft's, in retrospect well-named, Danger servers, someone raised issues of backup frequency, restore points in the event of server crashes, something.

Sure they did.

And something went horribly wrong -- although at the moment nobody seems to know (or be willing to admit) exactly what the problem was. Explanations -- and buzz -- range from internal sabotage to massively coincidental bad luck.

Whatever.

The point is that evidently the main data and backup systems failed at the same time and there went the customers' data.

And therein lies one of the challenges as we move more and more of our resources -- and the lifeblood of our businesses -- to the cloud.

Disasters do happen -- and while we may not (please!) see one on the order of the Sidekick fiasco again, we will experience service outages, data issues, business failures, any one of which can be an inconvenience at best, a business catastrophe at worst.

My feeling is that the solution isn't to start blaming or, worse, fleeing, the cloud.

Rather, it's for cloud service customers to insist on and invest in local backup of critical data.

Counter-intuitive, I guess -- and certainly counter-cloud, but I have made the suspenders and belt argument before. Online backup and restore is a valuable and convenient service, for instance -- but if something goes wrong (and odds are, for some cloud services, it will), your local data will get you through the crisis.

That's a step toward real confidence in the your business's ability to thrive in the cloud -- and survive any cloud disasters, minor or major.

And that's worth a lot more than the measly hundred bucks Sidekick customers are getting offered for their "inconvenience."

Comment  | 
Print  | 
More Insights
Comments
Newest First  |  Oldest First  |  Threaded View
Edge-DRsplash-10-edge-articles
7 Old IT Things Every New InfoSec Pro Should Know
Joan Goodchild, Staff Editor,  4/20/2021
News
Cloud-Native Businesses Struggle With Security
Robert Lemos, Contributing Writer,  5/6/2021
Commentary
Defending Against Web Scraping Attacks
Rob Simon, Principal Security Consultant at TrustedSec,  5/7/2021
Register for Dark Reading Newsletters
White Papers
Video
Cartoon
Current Issue
2021 Top Enterprise IT Trends
We've identified the key trends that are poised to impact the IT landscape in 2021. Find out why they're important and how they will affect you today!
Flash Poll
How Enterprises are Developing Secure Applications
How Enterprises are Developing Secure Applications
Recent breaches of third-party apps are driving many organizations to think harder about the security of their off-the-shelf software as they continue to move left in secure software development practices.
Twitter Feed
Dark Reading - Bug Report
Bug Report
Enterprise Vulnerabilities
From DHS/US-CERT's National Vulnerability Database
CVE-2020-16632
PUBLISHED: 2021-05-15
A XSS Vulnerability in /uploads/dede/action_search.php in DedeCMS V5.7 SP2 allows an authenticated user to execute remote arbitrary code via the keyword parameter.
CVE-2021-32073
PUBLISHED: 2021-05-15
DedeCMS V5.7 SP2 contains a CSRF vulnerability that allows a remote attacker to send a malicious request to to the web manager allowing remote code execution.
CVE-2021-33033
PUBLISHED: 2021-05-14
The Linux kernel before 5.11.14 has a use-after-free in cipso_v4_genopt in net/ipv4/cipso_ipv4.c because the CIPSO and CALIPSO refcounting for the DOI definitions is mishandled, aka CID-ad5d07f4a9cd. This leads to writing an arbitrary value.
CVE-2021-33034
PUBLISHED: 2021-05-14
In the Linux kernel before 5.12.4, net/bluetooth/hci_event.c has a use-after-free when destroying an hci_chan, aka CID-5c4c8c954409. This leads to writing an arbitrary value.
CVE-2019-25044
PUBLISHED: 2021-05-14
The block subsystem in the Linux kernel before 5.2 has a use-after-free that can lead to arbitrary code execution in the kernel context and privilege escalation, aka CID-c3e2219216c9. This is related to blk_mq_free_rqs and blk_cleanup_queue.