Dark Reading is part of the Informa Tech Division of Informa PLC

This site is operated by a business or businesses owned by Informa PLC and all copyright resides with them.Informa PLC's registered office is 5 Howick Place, London SW1P 1WG. Registered in England and Wales. Number 8860726.

Risk

11/9/2010
04:49 PM
50%
50%

Schwartz On Security: Reaching The M&A Tipping Point

The jury is out on whether businesses will benefit from Intel buying McAfee or from Symantec, IBM and Microsoft sucking up everything in sight.

The pace of mergers and acquisitions in the security industry has been breathtaking, but could it be headed for a stop?

Since last year, numerous top-tier smaller outfits have been snapped up by large players. Indeed, more than $10 billion has been spent in just the past six months by Symantec (VeriSign plus PGP and GuardianEdge), IBM (BigFix, OpenPages, PSS Systems), Hewlett-Packard (Fortify and ArcSight) and CA (Arcot).

Furthermore, the technology industry heavyweights -- who by virtue of their size largely innovate via acquisitions -- apparently still have oodles of cash at the ready.

What's behind the breakneck pace of acquisitions? One answer is that it's mirroring a growing awareness of security by senior executives. "Security is starting to get higher on their radar screens now," said Steve Robinson, general manager for IBM security solutions. "Many of our corporate accounts are starting to put in chief security officers, to expand their security teams and see that security has impact on all parts of their business."

This evolution and growing security understanding is -- on the upside -- leading customers to demand more consolidated approaches to mitigating their security challenges. Accordingly, said Robinson, "we need to move beyond the single product to solve a single problem, to more of a comprehensive strategy."

Cue mergers and acquisitions. But where should they end, and are businesses best served by a more all-in-one approach?

Consider Intel's $7.7 billion acquisition of McAfee, which surprised many industry watchers who thought endpoint security should be built into the operating system, rather than the motherboard.

The positive spin is that the deal has the potential to bake-in better security to PCs and mobile devices -- through to virtualized environments and the cloud -- from the get-go. But it also has the potential to be seen, in a few years, as an expensive one-size-fits-all boondoggle of AOL proportions.

Garter Group analyst John Pescatore likens the overall information security M&A equation to cars and boats: Would you buy a car from a boat maker? How about a boat from a carmaker? The short answer is, no. Now extend the paradigm to information security.

"I'm always amazed when network infrastructure vendors like Cisco and Juniper build security solutions that try to get us to put their software on our endpoints, and when software vendors like IBM Tivoli or CA acquire and try to sell network security products," he said. "These strategies always end badly -- it is why the McLobster sandwich and the Nobu Whopper never did well either."

Previous
1 of 2
Next
Comment  | 
Print  | 
More Insights
Comments
Newest First  |  Oldest First  |  Threaded View
Commentary
Ransomware Is Not the Problem
Adam Shostack, Consultant, Entrepreneur, Technologist, Game Designer,  6/9/2021
Edge-DRsplash-11-edge-ask-the-experts
How Can I Test the Security of My Home-Office Employees' Routers?
John Bock, Senior Research Scientist,  6/7/2021
News
New Ransomware Group Claiming Connection to REvil Gang Surfaces
Jai Vijayan, Contributing Writer,  6/10/2021
Register for Dark Reading Newsletters
White Papers
Video
Cartoon Contest
Write a Caption, Win an Amazon Gift Card! Click Here
Latest Comment: Zero Trust doesn't have to break your budget!
Current Issue
The State of Cybersecurity Incident Response
In this report learn how enterprises are building their incident response teams and processes, how they research potential compromises, how they respond to new breaches, and what tools and processes they use to remediate problems and improve their cyber defenses for the future.
Flash Poll
How Enterprises are Developing Secure Applications
How Enterprises are Developing Secure Applications
Recent breaches of third-party apps are driving many organizations to think harder about the security of their off-the-shelf software as they continue to move left in secure software development practices.
Twitter Feed
Dark Reading - Bug Report
Bug Report
Enterprise Vulnerabilities
From DHS/US-CERT's National Vulnerability Database
CVE-2021-31476
PUBLISHED: 2021-06-16
This vulnerability allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code on affected installations of Foxit PhantomPDF 10.1.3.37598. User interaction is required to exploit this vulnerability in that the target must visit a malicious page or open a malicious file. The specific flaw exists within the han...
CVE-2021-31477
PUBLISHED: 2021-06-16
This vulnerability allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code on affected installations of GE Reason RPV311 14A03. Authentication is not required to exploit this vulnerability. The specific flaw exists within the firmware and filesystem of the device. The firmware and filesystem contain hard-...
CVE-2021-32690
PUBLISHED: 2021-06-16
Helm is a tool for managing Charts (packages of pre-configured Kubernetes resources). In versions of helm prior to 3.6.1, a vulnerability exists where the username and password credentials associated with a Helm repository could be passed on to another domain referenced by that Helm repository. This...
CVE-2021-32691
PUBLISHED: 2021-06-16
Apollos Apps is an open source platform for launching church-related apps. In Apollos Apps versions prior to 2.20.0, new user registrations are able to access anyone's account by only knowing their basic profile information (name, birthday, gender, etc). This includes all app functionality within th...
CVE-2021-32243
PUBLISHED: 2021-06-16
FOGProject v1.5.9 is affected by a File Upload RCE (Authenticated).