Dark Reading is part of the Informa Tech Division of Informa PLC

This site is operated by a business or businesses owned by Informa PLC and all copyright resides with them.Informa PLC's registered office is 5 Howick Place, London SW1P 1WG. Registered in England and Wales. Number 8860726.

Risk

11/9/2010
04:49 PM
50%
50%

Schwartz On Security: Reaching The M&A Tipping Point

The jury is out on whether businesses will benefit from Intel buying McAfee or from Symantec, IBM and Microsoft sucking up everything in sight.

The pace of mergers and acquisitions in the security industry has been breathtaking, but could it be headed for a stop?

Since last year, numerous top-tier smaller outfits have been snapped up by large players. Indeed, more than $10 billion has been spent in just the past six months by Symantec (VeriSign plus PGP and GuardianEdge), IBM (BigFix, OpenPages, PSS Systems), Hewlett-Packard (Fortify and ArcSight) and CA (Arcot).

Furthermore, the technology industry heavyweights -- who by virtue of their size largely innovate via acquisitions -- apparently still have oodles of cash at the ready.

What's behind the breakneck pace of acquisitions? One answer is that it's mirroring a growing awareness of security by senior executives. "Security is starting to get higher on their radar screens now," said Steve Robinson, general manager for IBM security solutions. "Many of our corporate accounts are starting to put in chief security officers, to expand their security teams and see that security has impact on all parts of their business."

This evolution and growing security understanding is -- on the upside -- leading customers to demand more consolidated approaches to mitigating their security challenges. Accordingly, said Robinson, "we need to move beyond the single product to solve a single problem, to more of a comprehensive strategy."

Cue mergers and acquisitions. But where should they end, and are businesses best served by a more all-in-one approach?

Consider Intel's $7.7 billion acquisition of McAfee, which surprised many industry watchers who thought endpoint security should be built into the operating system, rather than the motherboard.

The positive spin is that the deal has the potential to bake-in better security to PCs and mobile devices -- through to virtualized environments and the cloud -- from the get-go. But it also has the potential to be seen, in a few years, as an expensive one-size-fits-all boondoggle of AOL proportions.

Garter Group analyst John Pescatore likens the overall information security M&A equation to cars and boats: Would you buy a car from a boat maker? How about a boat from a carmaker? The short answer is, no. Now extend the paradigm to information security.

"I'm always amazed when network infrastructure vendors like Cisco and Juniper build security solutions that try to get us to put their software on our endpoints, and when software vendors like IBM Tivoli or CA acquire and try to sell network security products," he said. "These strategies always end badly -- it is why the McLobster sandwich and the Nobu Whopper never did well either."

Previous
1 of 2
Next
Comment  | 
Print  | 
More Insights
Comments
Newest First  |  Oldest First  |  Threaded View
Why Vulnerable Code Is Shipped Knowingly
Chris Eng, Chief Research Officer, Veracode,  11/30/2020
Register for Dark Reading Newsletters
White Papers
Video
Cartoon Contest
Write a Caption, Win an Amazon Gift Card! Click Here
Latest Comment: I think the boss is bing watching '70s TV shows again!
Current Issue
2021 Top Enterprise IT Trends
We've identified the key trends that are poised to impact the IT landscape in 2021. Find out why they're important and how they will affect you today!
Flash Poll
Twitter Feed
Dark Reading - Bug Report
Bug Report
Enterprise Vulnerabilities
From DHS/US-CERT's National Vulnerability Database
CVE-2020-29279
PUBLISHED: 2020-12-02
PHP remote file inclusion in the assign_resume_tpl method in Application/Common/Controller/BaseController.class.php in 74CMS before 6.0.48 allows remote code execution.
CVE-2020-29280
PUBLISHED: 2020-12-02
The Victor CMS v1.0 application is vulnerable to SQL injection via the 'search' parameter on the search.php page.
CVE-2020-29282
PUBLISHED: 2020-12-02
SQL injection vulnerability in BloodX 1.0 allows attackers to bypass authentication.
CVE-2020-29283
PUBLISHED: 2020-12-02
An SQL injection vulnerability was discovered in Online Doctor Appointment Booking System PHP and Mysql via the q parameter to getuser.php.
CVE-2020-29284
PUBLISHED: 2020-12-02
The file view-chair-list.php in Multi Restaurant Table Reservation System 1.0 does not perform input validation on the table_id parameter which allows unauthenticated SQL Injection. An attacker can send malicious input in the GET request to /dashboard/view-chair-list.php?table_id= to trigger the vul...