Department of Justice investigators have declined to comment on the status of the Palin e-mail investigation.

Thomas Claburn, Editor at Large, Enterprise Mobility

September 19, 2008

2 Min Read

David Kernell, 20, son of Tennessee Democratic state Rep. Mike Kernell, may soon be speaking with the FBI and the Secret Service about whether he played a role in the hacking of Republican vice presidential candidate Sarah Palin's Yahoo Mail account.

According to The Tennessean, the elder Kernell has confirmed that his son, a University of Tennessee-Knoxville student, is "the person who was the subject of speculation on blogs on the subject."

What the bloggers have been speculating about is that the younger Kernell owns the e-mail address [email protected]. The "Rubico" address has been linked to an apparent confession in the Palin hacking incident that was posted initially on the 4chan.org forum and later on various news sites and blogs.

"Rubico's" purported confession described how easy it was to reset the password of Sarah Palin's Yahoo Mail account and to hijack it.

Palin has been criticized for using a nongovernment e-mail account as a way to avoid accountability for official communications.

Alaska lawmakers are investigating accusations that she fired the state's public-safety commissioner because he wouldn't fire her ex-brother-in-law, a state trooper.

A report on Memphis CBS affiliate WREG-TV said that the FBI's Anchorage, Alaska, office has been in contact with the FBI in Memphis in conjunction with the Palin e-mail investigation. The FBI and Secret Service began looking into the incident Wednesday.

A Department of Justice spokeswoman declined to comment on the status of the Palin e-mail investigation.

According to the Electronic Frontier Foundation, the Justice Department "may be hamstrung in any prosecution of [the Palin e-mail hack] by its restrictive view of 'electronic storage.' "

The Justice Department, in its Prosecuting Computer Crimes Manual, argues that e-mail, once it has been read, is neither stored nor backed up under the terms of the Stored Communications Act. Such messages thus do not qualify for protection under the act.

There are, however, other computer crime statues that could be brought to bear. In a blog post, Andrew Grossman, senior legal policy analyst at the Heritage Foundation, suggests computer fraud charges could be filed.

The Justice Department spokeswoman declined to comment about possible charges.

About the Author(s)

Thomas Claburn

Editor at Large, Enterprise Mobility

Thomas Claburn has been writing about business and technology since 1996, for publications such as New Architect, PC Computing, InformationWeek, Salon, Wired, and Ziff Davis Smart Business. Before that, he worked in film and television, having earned a not particularly useful master's degree in film production. He wrote the original treatment for 3DO's Killing Time, a short story that appeared in On Spec, and the screenplay for an independent film called The Hanged Man, which he would later direct. He's the author of a science fiction novel, Reflecting Fires, and a sadly neglected blog, Lot 49. His iPhone game, Blocfall, is available through the iTunes App Store. His wife is a talented jazz singer; he does not sing, which is for the best.

Keep up with the latest cybersecurity threats, newly discovered vulnerabilities, data breach information, and emerging trends. Delivered daily or weekly right to your email inbox.

You May Also Like


More Insights