Dark Reading is part of the Informa Tech Division of Informa PLC

This site is operated by a business or businesses owned by Informa PLC and all copyright resides with them.Informa PLC's registered office is 5 Howick Place, London SW1P 1WG. Registered in England and Wales. Number 8860726.

Risk

5/24/2010
08:06 PM
George V. Hulme
George V. Hulme
Commentary
50%
50%

Patient Data Dump Nets Urgent Care Center $50,000 Fine

Here's another egregious example of a health care provider being nothing less than reckless with patient data.

Here's another egregious example of a health care provider being nothing less than reckless with patient data.Last August a Greensboro, NC resident was looking for cans when he found boxes and boxes of unshredded patient data stuffed in a dumpster. The files belonged to a local urgent care center named Prompt Med. According to the North Carolina Attorney General's office about 600 files were recovered that held personal information on 757 people. Some of the information within the records included names, addresses, dates of birth, Social Security numbers, drivers' license numbers, and insurance account numbers, as well as personal health information.

The Greensboro resident took a sampling of the medical files to a local television station, and after their reporting, the state attorney general's office launched an investigation and announced a settlement and a fine against Prompt Med. From the North Carolina Department of Justice press statement on the imposed fine:

Under the settlement, Prompt Med is permanently barred from improperly disposing of patient records and has paid $50,000, including $26,650 in civil penalties that will go to public schools. The remaining $23,350 will go to fund consumer protection education and enforcement efforts, and to cover the costs of the Attorney General's investigation into the company. In addition, Prompt Med also paid an additional $50 for proper destruction of the illegally dumped records.

At the request of the Attorney General's office, Prompt Med previously reported the incident as a security breach and notified consumers whose information was placed at risk. A security breach happens when records containing personal information are lost, stolen or inappropriately displayed.

Unfortunately, we're seeing way too many similar incidents around the country. In my post from last month, Medical Records Keep Getting Dumped, we covered such record dumping occurring in Monicello, NY, Chattanooga, TN, and Port Lucie, FL.

Even more unfortunate: we're not seeing nearly enough similar fines levied. Let's hope the North Carolina Attorney General's Office sets a new tone going forward.

For my security, technology, and business observations throughout the day, you can find me on Twitter.

Comment  | 
Print  | 
More Insights
Comments
Newest First  |  Oldest First  |  Threaded View
DevSecOps: The Answer to the Cloud Security Skills Gap
Lamont Orange, Chief Information Security Officer at Netskope,  11/15/2019
Attackers' Costs Increasing as Businesses Focus on Security
Robert Lemos, Contributing Writer,  11/15/2019
TPM-Fail: What It Means & What to Do About It
Ari Singer, CTO at TrustPhi,  11/19/2019
Register for Dark Reading Newsletters
White Papers
Video
Cartoon Contest
Write a Caption, Win a Starbucks Card! Click Here
Latest Comment: -when I told you that our cyber-defense was from another age
Current Issue
Navigating the Deluge of Security Data
In this Tech Digest, Dark Reading shares the experiences of some top security practitioners as they navigate volumes of security data. We examine some examples of how enterprises can cull this data to find the clues they need.
Flash Poll
Rethinking Enterprise Data Defense
Rethinking Enterprise Data Defense
Frustrated with recurring intrusions and breaches, cybersecurity professionals are questioning some of the industrys conventional wisdom. Heres a look at what theyre thinking about.
Twitter Feed
Dark Reading - Bug Report
Bug Report
Enterprise Vulnerabilities
From DHS/US-CERT's National Vulnerability Database
CVE-2019-18858
PUBLISHED: 2019-11-20
CODESYS 3 web server before 3.5.15.20, as distributed with CODESYS Control runtime systems, has a Buffer Overflow.
CVE-2019-3466
PUBLISHED: 2019-11-20
The pg_ctlcluster script in postgresql-common in versions prior to 210 didn't drop privileges when creating socket/statistics temporary directories, which could result in local privilege escalation.
CVE-2010-4659
PUBLISHED: 2019-11-20
Cross-site scripting (XSS) vulnerability in statusnet through 2010 in error message contents.
CVE-2019-4530
PUBLISHED: 2019-11-20
IBM Maximo Asset Management 7.6, 7.6.1, and 7.6.1.1 could allow an authenticated user to delete a record that they should not normally be able to. IBM X-Force ID: 165586.
CVE-2019-4561
PUBLISHED: 2019-11-20
IBM Security Identity Manager 6.0.0 could allow a remote attacker to execute arbitrary code on the system, caused by the deserialization of untrusted data. By persuading a victim to visit a specially crafted Web site, an attacker could exploit this vulnerability to execute arbitrary code on the syst...