Dark Reading is part of the Informa Tech Division of Informa PLC

This site is operated by a business or businesses owned by Informa PLC and all copyright resides with them.Informa PLC's registered office is 5 Howick Place, London SW1P 1WG. Registered in England and Wales. Number 8860726.

Risk

6/11/2010
02:55 PM
George V. Hulme
George V. Hulme
Commentary
50%
50%

On AT&T's iPad E-mail Security Snafu

While the flaw that made it possible for onlookers to access the e-mail addresses of Apple iPad users wasn't directly Apple's fault, the incident is certainly disrupting the Jobs' Reality Distortion Field and dulling some shine of the successful iPad launch.

While the flaw that made it possible for onlookers to access the e-mail addresses of Apple iPad users wasn't directly Apple's fault, the incident is certainly disrupting the Jobs' Reality Distortion Field and dulling some shine of the successful iPad launch.You're going to hear plenty of warnings about the (in)security of tablets, mobile devices, and who knows what other fear mongering about the AT&T security breach. Most of it emanating from vendor press releases and other sure-fire sources of fear, uncertainly, and doubt. Some of the warnings will be accurate: the victims of the breach could be (slightly) more susceptible to phishing and targeted malware attacks. But that's not the real story here. Essentially, all that happened is that a security firm managed to brute force a process that returned the correct unique identifier for the iPad and associated e-mail address. Based upon published lists, there were plenty of .gov, .mil, as well as high-level politicians, journalists, and CEOs affected. Our Paul McDougall has an in-depth write-up here.

Jim Rapoza blogged earlier today that Cloud Is Real Culprit in iPad/AT&T Security Hole. He makes the point that cloud computing brings risk. Though I couldn't disagree more with the spirit of the headline. The "cloud" isn't the culprit at all: AT&T's security and development processes are.

And there lays the bigger warning here is a caution that InformationWeek has issued a number of times now: the security status of your business partners matter. Big Time. I covered this topic in some depth back in the pre-virtualized, mashed-up and cloudified era of 2002. Yet, the moral of In Lockstep On Security is just as true today: carefully vet the IT security of your business partners. Back then the processes would have primarily included reading over security policies and plans, running vulnerability assessments, vetting their processes, and getting the right contracts in place.

Same is true now, only much more complex. Almost every provider within your digital supply-chain is a concern. How sufficient is the security of your hosting providers? What about any content providers that feed material and advertisements on your web properties? How about the quality of the code your outsourced developers are producing? How snug is the security of every notebook of all of the contractors that come through the front doors of your office buildings every day? What about the security posture of the home systems your employee's use to finish their work late at night?

The potential points of failure many. And that's the magnitude of the challenge in IT security today, as one all-too-easy mistake in any of those areas can turn quickly into a significant breach.

Consider the recent slip in security from the Department of Veterans Affords, covered in J. Nicolas Hoover's story Stolen Laptop Contains Personal Data. In short, a contractor had their laptop stolen and the data of hundreds of veterans was stored unencrypted on the hard-drive. Turns out in the prior year, Hoover reported, that 28% of VA contractors hadn't signed contracts containing clauses pertaining to IT security. Whoops. The story Do You Know Where Your Employee's Data Is? nailed a number of the risks associated with outsourcing sensitive data management to third parties.

Ignore the stories about the relatively minor risks of phishing attacks and e-mail addresses being exposed by this security flaw. The bigger lesson is the importance of knowing the security maturity of your business partners. And it doesn't matter if it's the security built into a service on a device with your logo on it, or if it's applications developed by outsourcers, or data sitting on in a contractors notebook or a partner's data center. Should something go wrong with the security controls of those partners it's still your problem.

Will Apple's image survive AT&T's gaffe? Absolutely. According to Morgan Stanley, the iPad is on track to be one of the most popular devices in history. I don't see this event denting that growth.

The more important question for you is how well your business would survive, or weather the damage of a third party provider creating a similarly embarrassing security mistake. Guess that comes down to the power of your own Reality Distortion Field.

For my security and technology observations throughout the day, consider following me on Twitter.

 

Recommended Reading:

Comment  | 
Print  | 
More Insights
Comments
Oldest First  |  Newest First  |  Threaded View
COVID-19: Latest Security News & Commentary
Dark Reading Staff 8/3/2020
Pen Testers Who Got Arrested Doing Their Jobs Tell All
Kelly Jackson Higgins, Executive Editor at Dark Reading,  8/5/2020
New 'Nanodegree' Program Provides Hands-On Cybersecurity Training
Nicole Ferraro, Contributing Writer,  8/3/2020
Register for Dark Reading Newsletters
White Papers
Video
Cartoon Contest
Current Issue
Special Report: Computing's New Normal, a Dark Reading Perspective
This special report examines how IT security organizations have adapted to the "new normal" of computing and what the long-term effects will be. Read it and get a unique set of perspectives on issues ranging from new threats & vulnerabilities as a result of remote working to how enterprise security strategy will be affected long term.
Flash Poll
The Changing Face of Threat Intelligence
The Changing Face of Threat Intelligence
This special report takes a look at how enterprises are using threat intelligence, as well as emerging best practices for integrating threat intel into security operations and incident response. Download it today!
Twitter Feed
Dark Reading - Bug Report
Bug Report
Enterprise Vulnerabilities
From DHS/US-CERT's National Vulnerability Database
CVE-2020-17452
PUBLISHED: 2020-08-09
flatCore before 1.5.7 allows upload and execution of a .php file by an admin.
CVE-2020-17451
PUBLISHED: 2020-08-09
flatCore before 1.5.7 allows XSS by an admin via the acp/acp.php?tn=pages&sub=edit&editpage=1 page_linkname, page_title, page_content, or page_extracontent parameter, or the acp/acp.php?tn=system&sub=sys_pref prefs_pagename, prefs_pagetitle, or prefs_pagesubtitle parameter.
CVE-2020-17447
PUBLISHED: 2020-08-09
MyBB before 1.8.24 allows XSS because the visual editor mishandles [align], [size], [quote], and [font] in MyCode.
CVE-2020-16248
PUBLISHED: 2020-08-09
** DISPUTED ** Prometheus Blackbox Exporter through 0.17.0 allows /probe?target= SSRF. NOTE: follow-on discussion suggests that this might plausibly be interpreted as both intended functionality and also a vulnerability.
CVE-2020-15820
PUBLISHED: 2020-08-08
In JetBrains YouTrack before 2020.2.6881, the markdown parser could disclose hidden file existence.