Dark Reading is part of the Informa Tech Division of Informa PLC

This site is operated by a business or businesses owned by Informa PLC and all copyright resides with them.Informa PLC's registered office is 5 Howick Place, London SW1P 1WG. Registered in England and Wales. Number 8860726.

Risk

6/11/2010
02:55 PM
George V. Hulme
George V. Hulme
Commentary
50%
50%

On AT&T's iPad E-mail Security Snafu

While the flaw that made it possible for onlookers to access the e-mail addresses of Apple iPad users wasn't directly Apple's fault, the incident is certainly disrupting the Jobs' Reality Distortion Field and dulling some shine of the successful iPad launch.

While the flaw that made it possible for onlookers to access the e-mail addresses of Apple iPad users wasn't directly Apple's fault, the incident is certainly disrupting the Jobs' Reality Distortion Field and dulling some shine of the successful iPad launch.You're going to hear plenty of warnings about the (in)security of tablets, mobile devices, and who knows what other fear mongering about the AT&T security breach. Most of it emanating from vendor press releases and other sure-fire sources of fear, uncertainly, and doubt. Some of the warnings will be accurate: the victims of the breach could be (slightly) more susceptible to phishing and targeted malware attacks. But that's not the real story here. Essentially, all that happened is that a security firm managed to brute force a process that returned the correct unique identifier for the iPad and associated e-mail address. Based upon published lists, there were plenty of .gov, .mil, as well as high-level politicians, journalists, and CEOs affected. Our Paul McDougall has an in-depth write-up here.

Jim Rapoza blogged earlier today that Cloud Is Real Culprit in iPad/AT&T Security Hole. He makes the point that cloud computing brings risk. Though I couldn't disagree more with the spirit of the headline. The "cloud" isn't the culprit at all: AT&T's security and development processes are.

And there lays the bigger warning here is a caution that InformationWeek has issued a number of times now: the security status of your business partners matter. Big Time. I covered this topic in some depth back in the pre-virtualized, mashed-up and cloudified era of 2002. Yet, the moral of In Lockstep On Security is just as true today: carefully vet the IT security of your business partners. Back then the processes would have primarily included reading over security policies and plans, running vulnerability assessments, vetting their processes, and getting the right contracts in place.

Same is true now, only much more complex. Almost every provider within your digital supply-chain is a concern. How sufficient is the security of your hosting providers? What about any content providers that feed material and advertisements on your web properties? How about the quality of the code your outsourced developers are producing? How snug is the security of every notebook of all of the contractors that come through the front doors of your office buildings every day? What about the security posture of the home systems your employee's use to finish their work late at night?

The potential points of failure many. And that's the magnitude of the challenge in IT security today, as one all-too-easy mistake in any of those areas can turn quickly into a significant breach.

Consider the recent slip in security from the Department of Veterans Affords, covered in J. Nicolas Hoover's story Stolen Laptop Contains Personal Data. In short, a contractor had their laptop stolen and the data of hundreds of veterans was stored unencrypted on the hard-drive. Turns out in the prior year, Hoover reported, that 28% of VA contractors hadn't signed contracts containing clauses pertaining to IT security. Whoops. The story Do You Know Where Your Employee's Data Is? nailed a number of the risks associated with outsourcing sensitive data management to third parties.

Ignore the stories about the relatively minor risks of phishing attacks and e-mail addresses being exposed by this security flaw. The bigger lesson is the importance of knowing the security maturity of your business partners. And it doesn't matter if it's the security built into a service on a device with your logo on it, or if it's applications developed by outsourcers, or data sitting on in a contractors notebook or a partner's data center. Should something go wrong with the security controls of those partners it's still your problem.

Will Apple's image survive AT&T's gaffe? Absolutely. According to Morgan Stanley, the iPad is on track to be one of the most popular devices in history. I don't see this event denting that growth.

The more important question for you is how well your business would survive, or weather the damage of a third party provider creating a similarly embarrassing security mistake. Guess that comes down to the power of your own Reality Distortion Field.

For my security and technology observations throughout the day, consider following me on Twitter.

Comment  | 
Print  | 
More Insights
Comments
Newest First  |  Oldest First  |  Threaded View
News
Inside the Ransomware Campaigns Targeting Exchange Servers
Kelly Sheridan, Staff Editor, Dark Reading,  4/2/2021
Commentary
Beyond MITRE ATT&CK: The Case for a New Cyber Kill Chain
Rik Turner, Principal Analyst, Infrastructure Solutions, Omdia,  3/30/2021
Register for Dark Reading Newsletters
White Papers
Video
Cartoon
Current Issue
2021 Top Enterprise IT Trends
We've identified the key trends that are poised to impact the IT landscape in 2021. Find out why they're important and how they will affect you today!
Flash Poll
How Enterprises are Developing Secure Applications
How Enterprises are Developing Secure Applications
Recent breaches of third-party apps are driving many organizations to think harder about the security of their off-the-shelf software as they continue to move left in secure software development practices.
Twitter Feed
Dark Reading - Bug Report
Bug Report
Enterprise Vulnerabilities
From DHS/US-CERT's National Vulnerability Database
CVE-2021-31414
PUBLISHED: 2021-04-16
The unofficial vscode-rpm-spec extension before 0.3.2 for Visual Studio Code allows remote code execution via a crafted workspace configuration.
CVE-2021-26073
PUBLISHED: 2021-04-16
Broken Authentication in Atlassian Connect Express (ACE) from version 3.0.2 before version 6.6.0: Atlassian Connect Express is a Node.js package for building Atlassian Connect apps. Authentication between Atlassian products and the Atlassian Connect Express app occurs with a server-to-server JWT or ...
CVE-2021-26074
PUBLISHED: 2021-04-16
Broken Authentication in Atlassian Connect Spring Boot (ACSB) from version 1.1.0 before version 2.1.3: Atlassian Connect Spring Boot is a Java Spring Boot package for building Atlassian Connect apps. Authentication between Atlassian products and the Atlassian Connect Spring Boot app occurs with a se...
CVE-2018-19942
PUBLISHED: 2021-04-16
A cross-site scripting (XSS) vulnerability has been reported to affect earlier versions of File Station. If exploited, this vulnerability allows remote attackers to inject malicious code. We have already fixed this vulnerability in the following versions: QTS 4.5.2.1566 build 20210202 (and later) QT...
CVE-2021-27691
PUBLISHED: 2021-04-16
Command Injection in Tenda G0 routers with firmware versions v15.11.0.6(9039)_CN and v15.11.0.5(5876)_CN , and Tenda G1 and G3 routers with firmware versions v15.11.0.17(9502)_CN or v15.11.0.16(9024)_CN allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary OS commands via a crafted action/setDebugCfg request...