Dark Reading is part of the Informa Tech Division of Informa PLC

This site is operated by a business or businesses owned by Informa PLC and all copyright resides with them.Informa PLC's registered office is 5 Howick Place, London SW1P 1WG. Registered in England and Wales. Number 8860726.

Risk

2/28/2007
10:00 AM
50%
50%

Like a Sieve

Ways to circumvent content filters, and why you should still retain them

8:00 AM -- In today's highly litigious corporate atmosphere, porn in the office isn't an option, if it ever was. However, more and more services are popping up to evade content filters, while at the same time the laws are becoming more and more strict against the whole concept of it.

So let's say I'm Mr. Joe Salesman and I have a thing for high quality porn. My home connection is a phone line, so it is far more convenient for me to download my high-resolution porn from the office since the office T1 line trumps my 56k modem. What can I do to get around those pesky content filters that blacklist Websites? Well, thankfully there are a plethora of sites out there to help with this.

Eventually, someone will get wise and block all of my proxies, so perhaps there is another way, including using Google itself, to serve up my porn. My office certainly won't block access to Google, and they wouldn't question a bit of traffic going to and from Google's Websites, so I'm pretty home free. Google is my new source for porn, while I'm surfing at work.

Now let's say someone finds out about my porn habits and attempts to get me fired. Then it's time to steal all the corporate secrets I am privy to as I get prepared to be fired. The stupid content filter will stop me from doing this, so I have to think of some way to encrypt the data in transit so the content filter won't pick up things like "Confidential."

My obvious choice is an SSH tunnel but what about using another language? Most content filters only speak one language. OK, that's good, but I don't speak another language and can't use a translation service since that would require uploading the content to them in the first place, defeating the purpose. My other option is to use pig latin, or simply add a few extraneous numbers in each word, or a dozen other incredibly simple tactics to obfuscate the text.

The point is, content filters are unable to keep up with the escalating interest in defeating them. So given that, are they worth having? The short answer: probably yes. If you can say that you are in a defensible position having done your best to stop it, it can save you a lot of trouble when you get on the witness stand. Also, it can help you detect users who aren't savvy enough to evade the content filters. So while I don't recommend them as an actual security measure, they can mitigate a lot of corporate risk.

— RSnake is a red-blooded lumberjack whose rants can also be found at Ha.ckers and F*the.net. Special to Dark Reading

Comment  | 
Print  | 
More Insights
Comments
Newest First  |  Oldest First  |  Threaded View
News
Inside the Ransomware Campaigns Targeting Exchange Servers
Kelly Sheridan, Staff Editor, Dark Reading,  4/2/2021
Commentary
Beyond MITRE ATT&CK: The Case for a New Cyber Kill Chain
Rik Turner, Principal Analyst, Infrastructure Solutions, Omdia,  3/30/2021
Register for Dark Reading Newsletters
White Papers
Video
Cartoon
Current Issue
2021 Top Enterprise IT Trends
We've identified the key trends that are poised to impact the IT landscape in 2021. Find out why they're important and how they will affect you today!
Flash Poll
How Enterprises are Developing Secure Applications
How Enterprises are Developing Secure Applications
Recent breaches of third-party apps are driving many organizations to think harder about the security of their off-the-shelf software as they continue to move left in secure software development practices.
Twitter Feed
Dark Reading - Bug Report
Bug Report
Enterprise Vulnerabilities
From DHS/US-CERT's National Vulnerability Database
CVE-2021-29445
PUBLISHED: 2021-04-16
jose-node-esm-runtime is an npm package which provides a number of cryptographic functions. In versions prior to 3.11.4 the AES_CBC_HMAC_SHA2 Algorithm (A128CBC-HS256, A192CBC-HS384, A256CBC-HS512) decryption would always execute both HMAC tag verification and CBC decryption, if either failed `JWEDe...
CVE-2021-29446
PUBLISHED: 2021-04-16
jose-node-cjs-runtime is an npm package which provides a number of cryptographic functions. In versions prior to 3.11.4 the AES_CBC_HMAC_SHA2 Algorithm (A128CBC-HS256, A192CBC-HS384, A256CBC-HS512) decryption would always execute both HMAC tag verification and CBC decryption, if either failed `JWEDe...
CVE-2021-29451
PUBLISHED: 2021-04-16
Portofino is an open source web development framework. Portofino before version 5.2.1 did not properly verify the signature of JSON Web Tokens. This allows forging a valid JWT. The issue will be patched in the upcoming 5.2.1 release.
CVE-2021-29452
PUBLISHED: 2021-04-16
a12n-server is an npm package which aims to provide a simple authentication system. A new HAL-Form was added to allow editing users in version 0.18.0. This feature should only have been accessible to admins. Unfortunately, privileges were incorrectly checked allowing any logged in user to make this ...
CVE-2021-29444
PUBLISHED: 2021-04-16
jose-browser-runtime is an npm package which provides a number of cryptographic functions. In versions prior to 3.11.4 the AES_CBC_HMAC_SHA2 Algorithm (A128CBC-HS256, A192CBC-HS384, A256CBC-HS512) decryption would always execute both HMAC tag verification and CBC decryption, if either failed `JWEDec...