Dark Reading is part of the Informa Tech Division of Informa PLC

This site is operated by a business or businesses owned by Informa PLC and all copyright resides with them.Informa PLC's registered office is 5 Howick Place, London SW1P 1WG. Registered in England and Wales. Number 8860726.

Risk

10/1/2007
04:52 PM
Keith Ferrell
Keith Ferrell
Commentary
50%
50%

Laptop Security: Mind The Gap

More big retailer cyber security lessons for small to midsize businesses: This time a security gap hit The Gap.

More big retailer cyber security lessons for small to midsize businesses: This time a security gap hit The Gap.A laptop containing hundreds of thousands of job applicants' records, including Social Security numbers -- all unencrypted -- was stolen from The Gap's third-party applicant-screener.

Gap swung into positive-spin action pretty quickly -- a year of free credit monitoring for info-compromised job-seekers, etc. -- as well as making clear that their agreement with the third-party required that information be encrypted. Which it wasn't.

The lesson for the rest of us? Several, actually. Among them:

Third-party contractors have to be counted among your business's endpoints, too. Any of your information -- or your customers' or employees' -- that you assign to a third party is only as secure as the third party's security practices, policies and programs.

Contractual agreements covering security -- encryption in this case -- are only effectve if the third party actually adheres to the terms of the contract. The Gap may well have a case against the vendor for not following the terms of the contract -- but that doesn't help the compromised applicants.

And, more important, the bad-vibe headlines around the breach don't say Third-Party Vendor Lets Down Gap (or words to that effect.) They say Gap Applicant Info Stolen (or words to that Gap-slapping effect.)

Finally -- though far from the final time this lesson will be offered -- we once more see a massive amount of data compromsied when the laptop it's on is stolen. Doesn't matter whether you're on an intense business trip to the home office or a relaxing vacation at the beach -- the convenience that laptops and notebooks offer is more than matched by the convenience they offer thieves.

If you're gonna take it with you, make sure it's encrypted.

And if you're gonna let third-party vendors take it with them, you'd better make triple sure that they're encrypting.

Your third-party vendors who are also granted access to your data must be treated as one of your endpoints.

When it comes to your business security, don't allow a third-party laptop... gap.

Comment  | 
Print  | 
More Insights
Comments
Newest First  |  Oldest First  |  Threaded View
DevSecOps: The Answer to the Cloud Security Skills Gap
Lamont Orange, Chief Information Security Officer at Netskope,  11/15/2019
Attackers' Costs Increasing as Businesses Focus on Security
Robert Lemos, Contributing Writer,  11/15/2019
TPM-Fail: What It Means & What to Do About It
Ari Singer, CTO at TrustPhi,  11/19/2019
Register for Dark Reading Newsletters
White Papers
Video
Cartoon Contest
Write a Caption, Win a Starbucks Card! Click Here
Latest Comment: -when I told you that our cyber-defense was from another age
Current Issue
Navigating the Deluge of Security Data
In this Tech Digest, Dark Reading shares the experiences of some top security practitioners as they navigate volumes of security data. We examine some examples of how enterprises can cull this data to find the clues they need.
Flash Poll
Rethinking Enterprise Data Defense
Rethinking Enterprise Data Defense
Frustrated with recurring intrusions and breaches, cybersecurity professionals are questioning some of the industrys conventional wisdom. Heres a look at what theyre thinking about.
Twitter Feed
Dark Reading - Bug Report
Bug Report
Enterprise Vulnerabilities
From DHS/US-CERT's National Vulnerability Database
CVE-2019-18858
PUBLISHED: 2019-11-20
CODESYS 3 web server before 3.5.15.20, as distributed with CODESYS Control runtime systems, has a Buffer Overflow.
CVE-2019-3466
PUBLISHED: 2019-11-20
The pg_ctlcluster script in postgresql-common in versions prior to 210 didn't drop privileges when creating socket/statistics temporary directories, which could result in local privilege escalation.
CVE-2010-4659
PUBLISHED: 2019-11-20
Cross-site scripting (XSS) vulnerability in statusnet through 2010 in error message contents.
CVE-2019-4530
PUBLISHED: 2019-11-20
IBM Maximo Asset Management 7.6, 7.6.1, and 7.6.1.1 could allow an authenticated user to delete a record that they should not normally be able to. IBM X-Force ID: 165586.
CVE-2019-4561
PUBLISHED: 2019-11-20
IBM Security Identity Manager 6.0.0 could allow a remote attacker to execute arbitrary code on the system, caused by the deserialization of untrusted data. By persuading a victim to visit a specially crafted Web site, an attacker could exploit this vulnerability to execute arbitrary code on the syst...