Dark Reading is part of the Informa Tech Division of Informa PLC

This site is operated by a business or businesses owned by Informa PLC and all copyright resides with them.Informa PLC's registered office is 5 Howick Place, London SW1P 1WG. Registered in England and Wales. Number 8860726.

Risk

3/27/2008
08:06 AM
Connect Directly
LinkedIn
Google+
Twitter
RSS
E-Mail
50%
50%

Internet Evolution Reports On Test-Shy Peer-To-Peer Filters

More than two dozen vendors say they can help ISPs filter unwanted P2P traffic. But only two were willing to put marketing claims on the line in an in-depth test of P2P filtering technology.

More than two dozen vendors say they can help ISPs filter unwanted P2P traffic. But only two were willing to put marketing claims on the line in an in-depth test of P2P filtering technology.You might not have a problem with sharing copyrighted music and video files over the Internet, but two groups clearly do: entertainment conglomerates and ISPs. Entertainment companies, particularly record labels, have watched profits fall in direct correlation with the adoption of file-sharing technology. Suing people, including the dead , for sharing files hasn't staunched the bleeding.

Meanwhile, ISPs that sell flat-rate broadband access view bandwidth-hogging P2P apps with the same horror that farmers do locust plagues.

Smelling a market opportunity, at least two dozen vendors claim to have the capability to identify and regulate P2P traffic on the Internet.

But a new report, posted on Internet Evolution, raises serious questions about these claims.

Internet Evolution and SNEP (Syndicat National de l'Edition), a French music industry organization, commissioned an independent test of P2P filtering products. The testing company invited 28 vendors, including major players such as Cisco and Juniper, to participate.

A mere five stepped up to the plate, and only under the condition that they could withdraw the results from the report if they didn't like them, sort of like a "get out of jail free" card.

Of the five that underwent testing, only two companies -- Ellacoya (recently acquired by Arbor Networks) and Ipoque -- allowed their results to be published.

As you can guess, Ellacoya and Ipoque did fairly well. Though not able to achieve perfect results in identifying and controlling P2P applications, both proved robust enough to be well worth a look.

Lab tests always have limitations because they are, by definition, an artificial environment. That said, the test bed seemed well-designed and thorough. I'd encourage you to check out the full report on Internet Evolution. And if you're in the market for a P2P filter, you've got a decent shortlist right in front of you.

 

Recommended Reading:

Comment  | 
Print  | 
More Insights
Comments
Newest First  |  Oldest First  |  Threaded View
COVID-19: Latest Security News & Commentary
Dark Reading Staff 8/3/2020
Pen Testers Who Got Arrested Doing Their Jobs Tell All
Kelly Jackson Higgins, Executive Editor at Dark Reading,  8/5/2020
Exploiting Google Cloud Platform With Ease
Dark Reading Staff 8/6/2020
Register for Dark Reading Newsletters
White Papers
Video
Cartoon Contest
Write a Caption, Win a Starbucks Card! Click Here
Latest Comment: This comment is waiting for review by our moderators.
Current Issue
Special Report: Computing's New Normal, a Dark Reading Perspective
This special report examines how IT security organizations have adapted to the "new normal" of computing and what the long-term effects will be. Read it and get a unique set of perspectives on issues ranging from new threats & vulnerabilities as a result of remote working to how enterprise security strategy will be affected long term.
Flash Poll
The Changing Face of Threat Intelligence
The Changing Face of Threat Intelligence
This special report takes a look at how enterprises are using threat intelligence, as well as emerging best practices for integrating threat intel into security operations and incident response. Download it today!
Twitter Feed
Dark Reading - Bug Report
Bug Report
Enterprise Vulnerabilities
From DHS/US-CERT's National Vulnerability Database
CVE-2020-16219
PUBLISHED: 2020-08-07
Delta Electronics TPEditor Versions 1.97 and prior. An out-of-bounds read may be exploited by processing specially crafted project files. Successful exploitation of this vulnerability may allow an attacker to read/modify information, execute arbitrary code, and/or crash the application.
CVE-2020-16221
PUBLISHED: 2020-08-07
Delta Electronics TPEditor Versions 1.97 and prior. A stack-based buffer overflow may be exploited by processing a specially crafted project file. Successful exploitation of this vulnerability may allow an attacker to read/modify information, execute arbitrary code, and/or crash the application.
CVE-2020-16223
PUBLISHED: 2020-08-07
Delta Electronics TPEditor Versions 1.97 and prior. A heap-based buffer overflow may be exploited by processing a specially crafted project file. Successful exploitation of this vulnerability may allow an attacker to read/modify information, execute arbitrary code, and/or crash the application.
CVE-2020-16225
PUBLISHED: 2020-08-07
Delta Electronics TPEditor Versions 1.97 and prior. A write-what-where condition may be exploited by processing a specially crafted project file. Successful exploitation of this vulnerability may allow an attacker to read/modify information, execute arbitrary code, and/or crash the application.
CVE-2020-16227
PUBLISHED: 2020-08-07
Delta Electronics TPEditor Versions 1.97 and prior. An improper input validation may be exploited by processing a specially crafted project file not validated when the data is entered by a user. Successful exploitation of this vulnerability may allow an attacker to read/modify information, execute a...