Dark Reading is part of the Informa Tech Division of Informa PLC

This site is operated by a business or businesses owned by Informa PLC and all copyright resides with them.Informa PLC's registered office is 5 Howick Place, London SW1P 1WG. Registered in England and Wales. Number 8860726.

Risk

9/15/2008
10:03 AM
Keith Ferrell
Keith Ferrell
Commentary
50%
50%

IBM SMB Servers Get Hardware-Based Encryption

With a new $1,099(and up) hardware-based data encryption device, IBM is talking directly to small and midsize businesses that operate their own servers (their own meaning IBM's.)

With a new $1,099(and up) hardware-based data encryption device, IBM is talking directly to small and midsize businesses that operate their own servers (their own meaning IBM's.)Big Blue's System x VAULT data encryption tool, for use with IBM System x server models x3650, x3400 and x3500 servers, imposes a password (they call it a key) requirement between encrypted hard disk data and users.

Because the encryption is hardware-based, sever overhead is less taxed than by software-based encryption.

According to IBM, the new RAID device solves the problem of disposing of hard disks (or having them stolen) by rendering the data they contain inaccessible without the appropriate key/password.

Good for them -- and anyone running IBM servers should certainly take a hard look at, to give it its full name, the IBM System x ServeRAID-MR10is VAULT -- but I still say that no hard disk should be disposed of until it's been wiped, run over, crushed, burned, etc. -- and you should probably hold onto the ashes. Suspenders, belt and more suspenders, I guess, but at least you'll lower the odds of getting caught with your pants down.

VAULT pricing starts at $1,099; the device will be available from IBM and IBM business partners before the end of the month.


Visit the bMighty Server How-To Center for practical, hands-on information about how to choose, install, and maintain your company's servers.

Don't miss the exclusive, downloadable guides:


Comment  | 
Print  | 
More Insights
Comments
Threaded  |  Newest First  |  Oldest First
COVID-19: Latest Security News & Commentary
Dark Reading Staff 9/21/2020
Cybersecurity Bounces Back, but Talent Still Absent
Simone Petrella, Chief Executive Officer, CyberVista,  9/16/2020
Meet the Computer Scientist Who Helped Push for Paper Ballots
Kelly Jackson Higgins, Executive Editor at Dark Reading,  9/16/2020
Register for Dark Reading Newsletters
White Papers
Video
Cartoon
Latest Comment: Exactly
Current Issue
Special Report: Computing's New Normal
This special report examines how IT security organizations have adapted to the "new normal" of computing and what the long-term effects will be. Read it and get a unique set of perspectives on issues ranging from new threats & vulnerabilities as a result of remote working to how enterprise security strategy will be affected long term.
Flash Poll
How IT Security Organizations are Attacking the Cybersecurity Problem
How IT Security Organizations are Attacking the Cybersecurity Problem
The COVID-19 pandemic turned the world -- and enterprise computing -- on end. Here's a look at how cybersecurity teams are retrenching their defense strategies, rebuilding their teams, and selecting new technologies to stop the oncoming rise of online attacks.
Twitter Feed
Dark Reading - Bug Report
Bug Report
Enterprise Vulnerabilities
From DHS/US-CERT's National Vulnerability Database
CVE-2020-7734
PUBLISHED: 2020-09-22
All versions of package cabot are vulnerable to Cross-site Scripting (XSS) via the Endpoint column.
CVE-2020-6564
PUBLISHED: 2020-09-21
Inappropriate implementation in permissions in Google Chrome prior to 85.0.4183.83 allowed a remote attacker to spoof the contents of a permission dialog via a crafted HTML page.
CVE-2020-6565
PUBLISHED: 2020-09-21
Inappropriate implementation in Omnibox in Google Chrome on iOS prior to 85.0.4183.83 allowed a remote attacker to spoof the contents of the Omnibox (URL bar) via a crafted HTML page.
CVE-2020-6566
PUBLISHED: 2020-09-21
Insufficient policy enforcement in media in Google Chrome prior to 85.0.4183.83 allowed a remote attacker to leak cross-origin data via a crafted HTML page.
CVE-2020-6567
PUBLISHED: 2020-09-21
Insufficient validation of untrusted input in command line handling in Google Chrome on Windows prior to 85.0.4183.83 allowed a remote attacker to bypass navigation restrictions via a crafted HTML page.