Dark Reading is part of the Informa Tech Division of Informa PLC

This site is operated by a business or businesses owned by Informa PLC and all copyright resides with them.Informa PLC's registered office is 5 Howick Place, London SW1P 1WG. Registered in England and Wales. Number 8860726.

Risk

Google Calls Microsoft Privacy Claims 'Myth'

Microsoft attack ad draws quick retort from Google, as controversy over new privacy policies heats up.

12 Epic Tech Fails of 2011
12 Epic Tech Fails of 2011
(click image for larger view and for slideshow)
Hours after Microsoft launched an ad campaign slamming Google's privacy changes as invasive, the search giant hit back, calling Microsoft's charges inaccurate and claiming that it, not Redmond, has the best tools for protecting the confidentiality of Internet users' information.

"A number of myths are being spread about Google's approach to privacy," said Betsy Masiello, Google's manager for public policy, in a blog entry Wednesday. "We just wanted to give you the facts."

Masiello called out Microsoft spokesman Frank Shaw's assertion earlier this week that, "The changes Google announced make it harder, not easier, for people to stay in control of their own information." Not so, said Masiello. "Our privacy controls have not changed. Period," she said.

Masiello took particular issue with Shaw's claim that Microsoft's online services like Bing search and Hotmail e-mail offer superior privacy controls compared to Google search and Gmail.

"Our industry-leading Privacy Dashboard, Ads Preference Manager, and data liberation efforts enable you to understand and control the information we collect and how we use it. And we've simplified our privacy policy to make it easier to understand," said Masiello. "Microsoft has no data liberation effort or Dashboard-like hub for users."

[ Google tweaked its social network rules because of user complaints--but some remain frustrated. Read Google+ Name Policy Leaves Users Unsatisfied. ]

Masiello also dismissed as a "myth" Shaw's charge that Google reads its users e-mails in order to generate data for contextual advertising. "No one reads your e-mail but you. Like most major e-mail providers, our computers scan messages to get rid of spam and malware, as well as show ads that are relevant to you," said Masiello.

Her protests didn't stop Microsoft from taking a fresh shot with a new ad Thursday that bears the title "Email Is Important." The ad, which is slated to run in major newspapers, says that "many Gmail users are increasingly concerned about exactly how their private e-mail information might be used for ads." The spot entices Google users to try Hotmail and Office 365 if they're concerned.

The spat began last week, after a Google exec announced the changes in a blog post. "Our new privacy policy makes clear that, if you're signed in, we may combine information you've provided from one service with information from other services," said Alma Whitten, Google's director of privacy, product, and engineering.

"In short, we'll treat you as a single user across all our products, which will mean a simpler, more intuitive Google experience," said Whitten. Google said the changes would go into effect "in just over a month."

Google's plan has caught the attention of key lawmakers. Reps Ed Markey (D-Mass) and Joe Barton (R-Texas) last week asked the Federal Trade Commission to clarify whether the changes would violate an agreement that Google made with the commission last year to better protect user privacy. The lawmakers want a response from the FTC by Feb. 21.

Please join us on Feb. 15 for the InformationWeek & Dark Reading virtual event Clouds, Outsourcing, And Security Services: Making Providers Part of Your IT Security Strategy. When you attend, you will be able to access live and on-demand webcast presentations as well as virtual booths packed with free resources, and you can also be eligible to win great prizes! (Free registration required.)

Comment  | 
Print  | 
More Insights
Comments
Newest First  |  Oldest First  |  Threaded View
Edge-DRsplash-10-edge-articles
7 Old IT Things Every New InfoSec Pro Should Know
Joan Goodchild, Staff Editor,  4/20/2021
News
Cloud-Native Businesses Struggle With Security
Robert Lemos, Contributing Writer,  5/6/2021
Commentary
Defending Against Web Scraping Attacks
Rob Simon, Principal Security Consultant at TrustedSec,  5/7/2021
Register for Dark Reading Newsletters
White Papers
Video
Cartoon
Current Issue
2021 Top Enterprise IT Trends
We've identified the key trends that are poised to impact the IT landscape in 2021. Find out why they're important and how they will affect you today!
Flash Poll
How Enterprises are Developing Secure Applications
How Enterprises are Developing Secure Applications
Recent breaches of third-party apps are driving many organizations to think harder about the security of their off-the-shelf software as they continue to move left in secure software development practices.
Twitter Feed
Dark Reading - Bug Report
Bug Report
Enterprise Vulnerabilities
From DHS/US-CERT's National Vulnerability Database
CVE-2020-16632
PUBLISHED: 2021-05-15
A XSS Vulnerability in /uploads/dede/action_search.php in DedeCMS V5.7 SP2 allows an authenticated user to execute remote arbitrary code via the keyword parameter.
CVE-2021-32073
PUBLISHED: 2021-05-15
DedeCMS V5.7 SP2 contains a CSRF vulnerability that allows a remote attacker to send a malicious request to to the web manager allowing remote code execution.
CVE-2021-33033
PUBLISHED: 2021-05-14
The Linux kernel before 5.11.14 has a use-after-free in cipso_v4_genopt in net/ipv4/cipso_ipv4.c because the CIPSO and CALIPSO refcounting for the DOI definitions is mishandled, aka CID-ad5d07f4a9cd. This leads to writing an arbitrary value.
CVE-2021-33034
PUBLISHED: 2021-05-14
In the Linux kernel before 5.12.4, net/bluetooth/hci_event.c has a use-after-free when destroying an hci_chan, aka CID-5c4c8c954409. This leads to writing an arbitrary value.
CVE-2019-25044
PUBLISHED: 2021-05-14
The block subsystem in the Linux kernel before 5.2 has a use-after-free that can lead to arbitrary code execution in the kernel context and privilege escalation, aka CID-c3e2219216c9. This is related to blk_mq_free_rqs and blk_cleanup_queue.