Dark Reading is part of the Informa Tech Division of Informa PLC

This site is operated by a business or businesses owned by Informa PLC and all copyright resides with them.Informa PLC's registered office is 5 Howick Place, London SW1P 1WG. Registered in England and Wales. Number 8860726.

Risk

12/13/2009
05:07 PM
Bob Evans
Bob Evans
Commentary
50%
50%

Global CIO: Oracle Customer Comments Will Force EU To Yield

Oracle customers last week crushed the EU's case against Oracle by saying its databases don't compete with MySQL. But will the EU listen?

After six months of the EU's underhanded attempts to derail Oracle's acquisition of Sun via back-room maneuverings and political gamesmanship, we saw once again late last week that the sunshine of truth is indeed the best disinfectant.

With a dozen Oracle customers shooting down the EU's contention that MySQL competes with Oracle's databases, even the reality-challenged anticapitalist Eurocrats will have a hard time glossing over those customer presentations in their ongoing attempt to make the world believe that up is down and war is peace and MySQL competes with Oracle's databases.

On top of that, Oracle early this morning released a list of 10 commitments to MySQL customers and developers that should alleviate any rational concerns about its intentions to keep MySQL fully open and accessible, with no unfair advantages accruing to Oracle over other database vendors. (See adjacent Global CIO blog post called "Oracle Makes 10 Commitments To Seal EU Deal".)

As for the irrational concerns sure to be raised by the dyed-in-the-wool ideological opponents of the deal, well, they're not interested in either fairness or free-market competition so to me their considerations are moot in light of these two huge steps forward for Oracle.

So with thanks to a strong overview piece in the Wall Street Journal, let's go to the the (virtual) videotape:

**The British telecommunications company Vodafone told the EC last week that Oracle's databases do not "constitute direct substitutes to Sun's offerings."

**Fujitsu Services Ltd said the MySQL and Oracle databases "operate in different markets."

**General Electric said while "both parties' offerings may on the face of it share some functionality, they are qualitatively different."

**McAfee said the databases from Oracle and MySQL don't "constitute direct substitutes."

Global CIO
Global CIOs: A Site Just For You
Visit InformationWeek's Global CIO -- our new online community and information resource for CIOs operating in the global economy.

**The Oracle Applications User Group, which has been around for 20 years and has members from more than 35 Fortune 100 global corporations, said in a recent letter to the chief EU competition-stifler Neelie Kroes: "With respect to MySQL, we expect Oracle will make contributions to the community as a whole that will make MySQL a viable and vibrant choice for enterprise database solution consideration. Our international membership fully supports the acquisition and feels it would increase competition."

**Deutsche Borse Group said it does "not see a negative impact of the Sun/Oracle transaction."

**Nasdaq OMX Group, commenting on the existence of MySQL alternatives, said, "We would most likely have chosen PostgreSQL if MySQL was not available."

**Spanish bank BBVA, the U.K. National Health Service, an Oracle user group represented by BT Group, Swedish cell-phone maker L.M. Ericsson, the British Atomic Weapons Agency, and Sabre Holdings Corp. were among other Oracle customers that either presented closed-door support for Oracle in Brussels late last week or offered strong written support.

In addition, Oracle said that 200 of its customers were writing letters to the EU informing it of their support for Oracle's acquisition of Sun.

On the other side of the scales, the EU parity-pushers were also expected to hear from opponents of the Oracle/Sun deal, including EU homeboy SAP; the man who developed MySQL; and, in something of a shocker, Microsoft—the former EU whipping boy now apparently eager to be spared the lash and to play the role of EU throne-sniffer.

Microsoft apparently thinks global corporations will be impressed with its toadying up to the bureaucratic outfit with which it clashed so bitterly over the years, and see in that action evidence that Microsoft's an aggressive and innovative global leader in enterprise technology. But if they do indeed think that, they will be profoundly wrong.

Conversely, it's a stroke of genius on Oracle's part to get its customers out in front of the European Commission that's been holding up Oracle's acquisition of Sun for the past six months in a pathetically poorly camouflaged effort to restrain the growth and impact of U.S.-based Oracle in Europe and other parts of the world. Here's why its all-in raise will cause the EU to back down:

Previous
1 of 2
Next
Comment  | 
Print  | 
More Insights
Comments
Newest First  |  Oldest First  |  Threaded View
Data Leak Week: Billions of Sensitive Files Exposed Online
Kelly Jackson Higgins, Executive Editor at Dark Reading,  12/10/2019
Intel Issues Fix for 'Plundervolt' SGX Flaw
Kelly Jackson Higgins, Executive Editor at Dark Reading,  12/11/2019
Register for Dark Reading Newsletters
White Papers
Video
Cartoon
Current Issue
The Year in Security: 2019
This Tech Digest provides a wrap up and overview of the year's top cybersecurity news stories. It was a year of new twists on old threats, with fears of another WannaCry-type worm and of a possible botnet army of Wi-Fi routers. But 2019 also underscored the risk of firmware and trusted security tools harboring dangerous holes that cybercriminals and nation-state hackers could readily abuse. Read more.
Flash Poll
Rethinking Enterprise Data Defense
Rethinking Enterprise Data Defense
Frustrated with recurring intrusions and breaches, cybersecurity professionals are questioning some of the industrys conventional wisdom. Heres a look at what theyre thinking about.
Twitter Feed
Dark Reading - Bug Report
Bug Report
Enterprise Vulnerabilities
From DHS/US-CERT's National Vulnerability Database
CVE-2019-5252
PUBLISHED: 2019-12-14
There is an improper authentication vulnerability in Huawei smartphones (Y9, Honor 8X, Honor 9 Lite, Honor 9i, Y6 Pro). The applock does not perform a sufficient authentication in a rare condition. Successful exploit could allow the attacker to use the application locked by applock in an instant.
CVE-2019-5235
PUBLISHED: 2019-12-14
Some Huawei smart phones have a null pointer dereference vulnerability. An attacker crafts specific packets and sends to the affected product to exploit this vulnerability. Successful exploitation may cause the affected phone to be abnormal.
CVE-2019-5264
PUBLISHED: 2019-12-13
There is an information disclosure vulnerability in certain Huawei smartphones (Mate 10;Mate 10 Pro;Honor V10;Changxiang 7S;P-smart;Changxiang 8 Plus;Y9 2018;Honor 9 Lite;Honor 9i;Mate 9). The software does not properly handle certain information of applications locked by applock in a rare condition...
CVE-2019-5277
PUBLISHED: 2019-12-13
Huawei CloudUSM-EUA V600R006C10;V600R019C00 have an information leak vulnerability. Due to improper configuration, the attacker may cause information leak by successful exploitation.
CVE-2019-5254
PUBLISHED: 2019-12-13
Certain Huawei products (AP2000;IPS Module;NGFW Module;NIP6300;NIP6600;NIP6800;S5700;SVN5600;SVN5800;SVN5800-C;SeMG9811;Secospace AntiDDoS8000;Secospace USG6300;Secospace USG6500;Secospace USG6600;USG6000V;eSpace U1981) have an out-of-bounds read vulnerability. An attacker who logs in to the board m...