Dark Reading is part of the Informa Tech Division of Informa PLC

This site is operated by a business or businesses owned by Informa PLC and all copyright resides with them.Informa PLC's registered office is 5 Howick Place, London SW1P 1WG. Registered in England and Wales. Number 8860726.

Risk

3/26/2009
09:24 PM
George V. Hulme
George V. Hulme
Commentary
50%
50%

Firms Taking Web App Security (More) Seriously

Anyone in IT, who hasn't been living under a hard drive for the past decade, knows that poor application development processes have littered the Internet and corporate networks alike with trashy code that makes systems too susceptible to attack. Some companies, according to a new survey, are taking quality code more seriously.

Anyone in IT, who hasn't been living under a hard drive for the past decade, knows that poor application development processes have littered the Internet and corporate networks alike with trashy code that makes systems too susceptible to attack. Some companies, according to a new survey, are taking quality code more seriously.It took a relentless series of Internet worms and embarrassing software vulnerabilities -- more than seven years ago -- to get Microsoft to finally put significant resources behind the development of more secure, sustainable applications.

It seems it takes a publicly disclosed data breach for firms to spend more on data security in the application development phase -- than those that haven't suffered such a breach. At least, that's the finding of a new survey (PDF) conducted by the Open Web Application Security Project, ran by the OWASP Foundation.

I guess it's human nature to only want to cut back on the salt and red meat -- after one has been diagnosed with hypertension. Or take vitamins and drink more fresh juice after being sick.

And that's reflected in the findings of this survey, of about 50 companies: enterprises that were publically breached spend more to develop secure code than those that have not been breached. Or, at least those that weren't required, by the threat of a big regulatory hammer, to publicly disclose the breach.

This shows than any evangelists within organizations fighting to improve the security of applications before they're shipped, or deployed, are fighting an uphill battle against human nature. That is: why fix or focus on something that isn't broken, or causing problems today?

Problem is this: more often than not, software is shipped, or sent onto production Web servers, when it's broken. And by broken, I mean loose enough to enable someone sitting in a café in Kazakhstan to pwn the app, and then most probably the server.

The challenge is people can't see broken, or shoddily written software. At least not if it runs without crashing (too often), they can't see the holes (buffer overflows, etc.) that make the application a sieve to attack.

The good news in the survey is that 61 percent of those surveyed report that they have independent third-parties review their Web application code before it goes to production.

That percentage, based on my own reporting and interviews, strikes me as way high. But it is a survey of only about 50 companies.

In any event, it's good news. And shows some steps in the right direction. With the daily grind of data breaches and software vulnerability announcements -- I'll take it.

 

Recommended Reading:

Comment  | 
Print  | 
More Insights
Comments
Threaded  |  Newest First  |  Oldest First
COVID-19: Latest Security News & Commentary
Dark Reading Staff 8/3/2020
Pen Testers Who Got Arrested Doing Their Jobs Tell All
Kelly Jackson Higgins, Executive Editor at Dark Reading,  8/5/2020
Browsers to Enforce Shorter Certificate Life Spans: What Businesses Should Know
Kelly Sheridan, Staff Editor, Dark Reading,  7/30/2020
Register for Dark Reading Newsletters
White Papers
Video
Cartoon Contest
Current Issue
Special Report: Computing's New Normal, a Dark Reading Perspective
This special report examines how IT security organizations have adapted to the "new normal" of computing and what the long-term effects will be. Read it and get a unique set of perspectives on issues ranging from new threats & vulnerabilities as a result of remote working to how enterprise security strategy will be affected long term.
Flash Poll
The Changing Face of Threat Intelligence
The Changing Face of Threat Intelligence
This special report takes a look at how enterprises are using threat intelligence, as well as emerging best practices for integrating threat intel into security operations and incident response. Download it today!
Twitter Feed
Dark Reading - Bug Report
Bug Report
Enterprise Vulnerabilities
From DHS/US-CERT's National Vulnerability Database
CVE-2020-17366
PUBLISHED: 2020-08-05
An issue was discovered in NLnet Labs Routinator 0.1.0 through 0.7.1. It allows remote attackers to bypass intended access restrictions or to cause a denial of service on dependent routing systems by strategically withholding RPKI Route Origin Authorisation ".roa" files or X509 Certificate...
CVE-2020-9036
PUBLISHED: 2020-08-05
Jeedom through 4.0.38 allows XSS.
CVE-2020-15127
PUBLISHED: 2020-08-05
In Contour ( Ingress controller for Kubernetes) before version 1.7.0, a bad actor can shut down all instances of Envoy, essentially killing the entire ingress data plane. GET requests to /shutdown on port 8090 of the Envoy pod initiate Envoy's shutdown procedure. The shutdown procedure includes flip...
CVE-2020-15132
PUBLISHED: 2020-08-05
In Sulu before versions 1.6.35, 2.0.10, and 2.1.1, when the "Forget password" feature on the login screen is used, Sulu asks the user for a username or email address. If the given string is not found, a response with a `400` error code is returned, along with a error message saying that th...
CVE-2020-7298
PUBLISHED: 2020-08-05
Unexpected behavior violation in McAfee Total Protection (MTP) prior to 16.0.R26 allows local users to turn off real time scanning via a specially crafted object making a specific function call.