Dark Reading is part of the Informa Tech Division of Informa PLC

This site is operated by a business or businesses owned by Informa PLC and all copyright resides with them.Informa PLC's registered office is 5 Howick Place, London SW1P 1WG. Registered in England and Wales. Number 8860726.

Risk

6/22/2008
11:27 PM
George V. Hulme
George V. Hulme
Commentary
50%
50%

Failing The Basics Will Get You Hacked

Information security firm Sophos evaluated 580 PCs over a 40-day period and found businesses of all sizes can't tackle even the most basic things when it comes to IT security.

Information security firm Sophos evaluated 580 PCs over a 40-day period and found businesses of all sizes can't tackle even the most basic things when it comes to IT security.While examining nearly 600 PCs during little more than a one-month period isn't a very large sampling, it's big enough for a taste of what's out there. And it's certainly not sweet.

The Sophos Endpoint Assessment Test gives systems a basic evaluation for things like missing patches, the state of client firewalls, and other security tests.

The bottom line: 81% of the endpoints failed one or more of those fundamental checks. That's fairly bad news considering that any of those conditions -- outdated patch level, firewall disabled, or out-of-date AV signatures -- can lead to a significant breach. But this test must have been targeting those unsophisticated SMBs, you say, and that's what tainted the results. Not so. Here's the demographic run down:

39% of the end users were part of an organization with fewer than 100 users

36% were part of an organization size between 100 and 1,000 users

25% were from organizations larger than 1,000 users

And the evaluation ran in fairly IT savvy geographies, too:

North America represented 39% of the sample base, while the United Kingdom made up 36%, and Australia and Germany were 11% and 9%, respectively (5% being other countries).

Said Bill Emerick, VP of product management for network access control at Sophos: "We're holding up to the light an aspect of endpoint security that has long been evaded by IT departments -- the inability to properly assess and control baseline endpoint security requirements such as updated patches, enabled firewalls, and current anti-malware signatures updates. Ultimately, machines that fail such a test represent the low-hanging fruit for cybercriminals and a real danger to their corporate networks."

And that's one of the most accurate quotes I've read in a press release in a long time.

This blog was updated at 9:45 a.m. to correct a quote.

 

Recommended Reading:

Comment  | 
Print  | 
More Insights
Comments
Threaded  |  Newest First  |  Oldest First
COVID-19: Latest Security News & Commentary
Dark Reading Staff 8/3/2020
Pen Testers Who Got Arrested Doing Their Jobs Tell All
Kelly Jackson Higgins, Executive Editor at Dark Reading,  8/5/2020
Browsers to Enforce Shorter Certificate Life Spans: What Businesses Should Know
Kelly Sheridan, Staff Editor, Dark Reading,  7/30/2020
Register for Dark Reading Newsletters
White Papers
Video
Cartoon Contest
Current Issue
Special Report: Computing's New Normal, a Dark Reading Perspective
This special report examines how IT security organizations have adapted to the "new normal" of computing and what the long-term effects will be. Read it and get a unique set of perspectives on issues ranging from new threats & vulnerabilities as a result of remote working to how enterprise security strategy will be affected long term.
Flash Poll
The Changing Face of Threat Intelligence
The Changing Face of Threat Intelligence
This special report takes a look at how enterprises are using threat intelligence, as well as emerging best practices for integrating threat intel into security operations and incident response. Download it today!
Twitter Feed
Dark Reading - Bug Report
Bug Report
Enterprise Vulnerabilities
From DHS/US-CERT's National Vulnerability Database
CVE-2020-17366
PUBLISHED: 2020-08-05
An issue was discovered in NLnet Labs Routinator 0.1.0 through 0.7.1. It allows remote attackers to bypass intended access restrictions or to cause a denial of service on dependent routing systems by strategically withholding RPKI Route Origin Authorisation ".roa" files or X509 Certificate...
CVE-2020-9036
PUBLISHED: 2020-08-05
Jeedom through 4.0.38 allows XSS.
CVE-2020-15127
PUBLISHED: 2020-08-05
In Contour ( Ingress controller for Kubernetes) before version 1.7.0, a bad actor can shut down all instances of Envoy, essentially killing the entire ingress data plane. GET requests to /shutdown on port 8090 of the Envoy pod initiate Envoy's shutdown procedure. The shutdown procedure includes flip...
CVE-2020-15132
PUBLISHED: 2020-08-05
In Sulu before versions 1.6.35, 2.0.10, and 2.1.1, when the "Forget password" feature on the login screen is used, Sulu asks the user for a username or email address. If the given string is not found, a response with a `400` error code is returned, along with a error message saying that th...
CVE-2020-7298
PUBLISHED: 2020-08-05
Unexpected behavior violation in McAfee Total Protection (MTP) prior to 16.0.R26 allows local users to turn off real time scanning via a specially crafted object making a specific function call.