Dark Reading is part of the Informa Tech Division of Informa PLC

This site is operated by a business or businesses owned by Informa PLC and all copyright resides with them.Informa PLC's registered office is 5 Howick Place, London SW1P 1WG. Registered in England and Wales. Number 8860726.

Risk

6/23/2006
05:15 AM
50%
50%

Data Loss Epidemic

Data losses at major corporations and government agencies are being reported almost every day now

1:25 PM -- As an IT security journalist, I'm amazed. As an ordinary consumer, I'm downright frightened.

In the last week alone, five major insurance and financial services companies and one government agency have admitted to losing or exposing the personal information of their customers through lax or careless security behavior. Most of these losses occurred not through the ingenuity of attackers, but through the boneheaded behavior of corporate employees – and, in some cases, their IT departments.

We started off the week with the news that ING had lost the names, Social Security numbers, and other data of 13,000 District of Columbia employees when a laptop was stolen from an ING agent living in the D.C. area. (See DC Workers' Personal Data Stolen.)

The laptop was not password-protected, and the data was not encrypted. That loss came just weeks after a similar theft resulted in the loss of 26.5 million veterans' personal information from a laptop owned by a D.C.-area employee of the Department of Veterans Affairs. (See VA Data Loss Worse Than Expected.)

(Note to myself, a D.C.-area resident: Buy new locks for the doors.)

Then, a day later, insurance giant AIG admitted that a break-in back in March had resulted in the loss of a file server containing personal data on some 970,000 of its customers. The data on the server was not encrypted, and AIG said most of the data shouldn't have been given to the company anyway. (See Thieves Nab AIG Customer Records.)

Was that the end of the wave? Not by a longshot. By Thursday, three more companies – Visa, Wachovia, and Equifax – had notified customers of laptop thefts or security violations that may have resulted in the loss of personal data for thousands more customers.

Aside from the sheer coincidence of these major data losses, the most amazing thing about the week's events is the lack of security policy enforcement that occurred (or didn't occur) to create the problems in the first place: Users walking out of the office with thousands of customer records on completely unprotected laptops; and huge caches of data that were never encrypted – or even known about.

How many more hits do companies have to take before IT wises up and gets tough on enforcing security policies?

Apparently, at least a few more. Many of the companies violated this week said they are only just embarking on policy enforcement and training programs to clean up the problem. Credit card vendors report that as many as 90 percent of retailers still aren't complying with guidelines for securing user credit information. (See Retailers Lag on Security Standard.) This thing is likely to get worse before it gets better.

Before you click to the next page, ask yourself the question: Is my customers' data truly safe? The answer may amaze you – or even frighten you.

— Tim Wilson, Site Editor, Dark Reading

Comment  | 
Print  | 
More Insights
Comments
Oldest First  |  Newest First  |  Threaded View
COVID-19: Latest Security News & Commentary
Dark Reading Staff 9/25/2020
Google Cloud Debuts Threat-Detection Service
Robert Lemos, Contributing Writer,  9/23/2020
Shopify's Employee Data Theft Underscores Risk of Rogue Insiders
Kelly Sheridan, Staff Editor, Dark Reading,  9/23/2020
Register for Dark Reading Newsletters
White Papers
Video
Cartoon
Current Issue
Special Report: Computing's New Normal
This special report examines how IT security organizations have adapted to the "new normal" of computing and what the long-term effects will be. Read it and get a unique set of perspectives on issues ranging from new threats & vulnerabilities as a result of remote working to how enterprise security strategy will be affected long term.
Flash Poll
How IT Security Organizations are Attacking the Cybersecurity Problem
How IT Security Organizations are Attacking the Cybersecurity Problem
The COVID-19 pandemic turned the world -- and enterprise computing -- on end. Here's a look at how cybersecurity teams are retrenching their defense strategies, rebuilding their teams, and selecting new technologies to stop the oncoming rise of online attacks.
Twitter Feed
Dark Reading - Bug Report
Bug Report
Enterprise Vulnerabilities
From DHS/US-CERT's National Vulnerability Database
CVE-2020-26120
PUBLISHED: 2020-09-27
XSS exists in the MobileFrontend extension for MediaWiki before 1.34.4 because section.line is mishandled during regex section line replacement from PageGateway. Using crafted HTML, an attacker can elicit an XSS attack via jQuery's parseHTML method, which can cause image callbacks to fire even witho...
CVE-2020-26121
PUBLISHED: 2020-09-27
An issue was discovered in the FileImporter extension for MediaWiki before 1.34.4. An attacker can import a file even when the target page is protected against "page creation" and the attacker should not be able to create it. This occurs because of a mishandled distinction between an uploa...
CVE-2020-25812
PUBLISHED: 2020-09-27
An issue was discovered in MediaWiki 1.34.x before 1.34.4. On Special:Contributions, the NS filter uses unescaped messages as keys in the option key for an HTMLForm specifier. This is vulnerable to a mild XSS if one of those messages is changed to include raw HTML.
CVE-2020-25813
PUBLISHED: 2020-09-27
In MediaWiki before 1.31.10 and 1.32.x through 1.34.x before 1.34.4, Special:UserRights exposes the existence of hidden users.
CVE-2020-25814
PUBLISHED: 2020-09-27
In MediaWiki before 1.31.10 and 1.32.x through 1.34.x before 1.34.4, XSS related to jQuery can occur. The attacker creates a message with [javascript:payload xss] and turns it into a jQuery object with mw.message().parse(). The expected result is that the jQuery object does not contain an <a> ...