Dark Reading is part of the Informa Tech Division of Informa PLC

This site is operated by a business or businesses owned by Informa PLC and all copyright resides with them.Informa PLC's registered office is 5 Howick Place, London SW1P 1WG. Registered in England and Wales. Number 8860726.

Risk

6/23/2006
05:15 AM
50%
50%

Data Loss Epidemic

Data losses at major corporations and government agencies are being reported almost every day now

1:25 PM -- As an IT security journalist, I'm amazed. As an ordinary consumer, I'm downright frightened.

In the last week alone, five major insurance and financial services companies and one government agency have admitted to losing or exposing the personal information of their customers through lax or careless security behavior. Most of these losses occurred not through the ingenuity of attackers, but through the boneheaded behavior of corporate employees – and, in some cases, their IT departments.

We started off the week with the news that ING had lost the names, Social Security numbers, and other data of 13,000 District of Columbia employees when a laptop was stolen from an ING agent living in the D.C. area. (See DC Workers' Personal Data Stolen.)

The laptop was not password-protected, and the data was not encrypted. That loss came just weeks after a similar theft resulted in the loss of 26.5 million veterans' personal information from a laptop owned by a D.C.-area employee of the Department of Veterans Affairs. (See VA Data Loss Worse Than Expected.)

(Note to myself, a D.C.-area resident: Buy new locks for the doors.)

Then, a day later, insurance giant AIG admitted that a break-in back in March had resulted in the loss of a file server containing personal data on some 970,000 of its customers. The data on the server was not encrypted, and AIG said most of the data shouldn't have been given to the company anyway. (See Thieves Nab AIG Customer Records.)

Was that the end of the wave? Not by a longshot. By Thursday, three more companies – Visa, Wachovia, and Equifax – had notified customers of laptop thefts or security violations that may have resulted in the loss of personal data for thousands more customers.

Aside from the sheer coincidence of these major data losses, the most amazing thing about the week's events is the lack of security policy enforcement that occurred (or didn't occur) to create the problems in the first place: Users walking out of the office with thousands of customer records on completely unprotected laptops; and huge caches of data that were never encrypted – or even known about.

How many more hits do companies have to take before IT wises up and gets tough on enforcing security policies?

Apparently, at least a few more. Many of the companies violated this week said they are only just embarking on policy enforcement and training programs to clean up the problem. Credit card vendors report that as many as 90 percent of retailers still aren't complying with guidelines for securing user credit information. (See Retailers Lag on Security Standard.) This thing is likely to get worse before it gets better.

Before you click to the next page, ask yourself the question: Is my customers' data truly safe? The answer may amaze you – or even frighten you.

— Tim Wilson, Site Editor, Dark Reading

Comment  | 
Print  | 
More Insights
Comments
Newest First  |  Oldest First  |  Threaded View
Firms Improve Threat Detection but Face Increasingly Disruptive Attacks
Robert Lemos, Contributing Writer,  2/20/2020
Ransomware Damage Hit $11.5B in 2019
Dark Reading Staff 2/20/2020
Register for Dark Reading Newsletters
White Papers
Video
Cartoon
Current Issue
6 Emerging Cyber Threats That Enterprises Face in 2020
This Tech Digest gives an in-depth look at six emerging cyber threats that enterprises could face in 2020. Download your copy today!
Flash Poll
How Enterprises Are Developing and Maintaining Secure Applications
How Enterprises Are Developing and Maintaining Secure Applications
The concept of application security is well known, but application security testing and remediation processes remain unbalanced. Most organizations are confident in their approach to AppSec, although others seem to have no approach at all. Read this report to find out more.
Twitter Feed
Dark Reading - Bug Report
Bug Report
Enterprise Vulnerabilities
From DHS/US-CERT's National Vulnerability Database
CVE-2019-18238
PUBLISHED: 2020-02-26
Moxa ioLogik 2542-HSPA Series Controllers and IOs, and IOxpress Configuration Utility ioLogik 2500 series firmware, Version 3.0 or lower IOxpress configuration utility, Version 2.3.0 or lower. Sensitive information is stored in configuration files without encryption, which may allow an attacker to a...
CVE-2019-17274
PUBLISHED: 2020-02-26
NetApp FAS 8300/8700 and AFF A400 Baseboard Management Controller (BMC) firmware versions 13.x prior to 13.1P1 were shipped with a default account enabled that could allow unauthorized arbitrary command execution via local access.
CVE-2019-17275
PUBLISHED: 2020-02-26
OnCommand Cloud Manager versions prior to 3.8.0 are susceptible to arbitrary code execution by remote attackers.
CVE-2020-3169
PUBLISHED: 2020-02-26
A vulnerability in the CLI of Cisco FXOS Software could allow an authenticated, local attacker to execute arbitrary commands on the underlying Linux operating system with a privilege level of root on an affected device. The vulnerability is due to insufficient validation of arguments passed to a spe...
CVE-2020-3170
PUBLISHED: 2020-02-26
A vulnerability in the NX-API feature of Cisco NX-OS Software could allow an unauthenticated, remote attacker to cause an NX-API system process to unexpectedly restart. The vulnerability is due to incorrect validation of the HTTP header of a request that is sent to the NX-API. An attacker could expl...