Dark Reading is part of the Informa Tech Division of Informa PLC

This site is operated by a business or businesses owned by Informa PLC and all copyright resides with them.Informa PLC's registered office is 5 Howick Place, London SW1P 1WG. Registered in England and Wales. Number 8860726.

Risk

5/22/2008
06:33 PM
George V. Hulme
George V. Hulme
Commentary
50%
50%

Connecticut Attorney General Blasts Bank Of New York Mellon

It's happened again. Another backup tape with millions of customers' information has gone missing. The tape was lost on Feb. 27, and the Connecticut authorities want to know more.

It's happened again. Another backup tape with millions of customers' information has gone missing. The tape was lost on Feb. 27, and the Connecticut authorities want to know more.According to a letter from the State of Connecticut's Attorney General, Richard Blumenthal, 10 unencrypted (yes, unencrypted) backup tapes were placed in a truck for "safe" delivery to a secure storage facility. The lock at the back of the truck was busted. And, only nine tapes made it to their planned destination.

Here's what the (unencrypted) tapes contained, according to Attorney General Blumenthal's letter:

BNY representatives informed my office that the information on the tapes contained, at a minimum, Social Security numbers, names and addresses, and possibly bank account numbers and balances.

In the letter, available here, the attorney general asks the bank a series of 12 questions that aim to get to the bottom of this incident, as well as any other possible incidents.

I just have two questions: Why has it taken so long for the loss of this backup tape to become public? Why wasn't the tape encrypted?

Perhaps the tape is just misplaced. Perhaps it fell out of the truck and rolled down a sewer. Perhaps only nine tapes where placed on the truck in the first place. Or maybe, a bad guy busted the lock and grabbed a tape. The broken lock on the truck points to an uncomfortable likelihood that the tape was stolen, and all 4.5 million customers should have been notified right away.

Of course, all of this could have been avoided by scrambling the information on the tape. Of all the things companies can do to protect your information, encrypting backup tapes is one of the most straightforward. The problem is, too few companies, including banks, care enough about your information to take the time, or spend a few extra bucks, to make sure it's managed safely.

Comment  | 
Print  | 
More Insights
Comments
Threaded  |  Newest First  |  Oldest First
7 Tips for Choosing Security Metrics That Matter
Ericka Chickowski, Contributing Writer,  10/19/2020
IoT Vulnerability Disclosure Platform Launched
Dark Reading Staff 10/19/2020
Register for Dark Reading Newsletters
White Papers
Video
Cartoon
Current Issue
Special Report: Computing's New Normal
This special report examines how IT security organizations have adapted to the "new normal" of computing and what the long-term effects will be. Read it and get a unique set of perspectives on issues ranging from new threats & vulnerabilities as a result of remote working to how enterprise security strategy will be affected long term.
Flash Poll
How IT Security Organizations are Attacking the Cybersecurity Problem
How IT Security Organizations are Attacking the Cybersecurity Problem
The COVID-19 pandemic turned the world -- and enterprise computing -- on end. Here's a look at how cybersecurity teams are retrenching their defense strategies, rebuilding their teams, and selecting new technologies to stop the oncoming rise of online attacks.
Twitter Feed
Dark Reading - Bug Report
Bug Report
Enterprise Vulnerabilities
From DHS/US-CERT's National Vulnerability Database
CVE-2020-15270
PUBLISHED: 2020-10-22
Parse Server (npm package parse-server) broadcasts events to all clients without checking if the session token is valid. This allows clients with expired sessions to still receive subscription objects. It is not possible to create subscription objects with invalid session tokens. The issue is not pa...
CVE-2018-21266
PUBLISHED: 2020-10-22
** REJECT ** DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: This candidate was withdrawn by its CNA. Notes: none.
CVE-2018-21267
PUBLISHED: 2020-10-22
** REJECT ** DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: This candidate was withdrawn by its CNA. Notes: none.
CVE-2020-27673
PUBLISHED: 2020-10-22
An issue was discovered in the Linux kernel through 5.9.1, as used with Xen through 4.14.x. Guest OS users can cause a denial of service (host OS hang) via a high rate of events to dom0, aka CID-e99502f76271.
CVE-2020-27674
PUBLISHED: 2020-10-22
An issue was discovered in Xen through 4.14.x allowing x86 PV guest OS users to gain guest OS privileges by modifying kernel memory contents, because invalidation of TLB entries is mishandled during use of an INVLPG-like attack technique.