Dark Reading is part of the Informa Tech Division of Informa PLC

This site is operated by a business or businesses owned by Informa PLC and all copyright resides with them.Informa PLC's registered office is 5 Howick Place, London SW1P 1WG. Registered in England and Wales. Number 8860726.

Risk

8/16/2009
11:18 PM
George V. Hulme
George V. Hulme
Commentary
50%
50%

Banks, Credit Card Companies Take Swipe At New Encryption Method

Visa Inc. and Fifth Third Bancorp are testing a novel technique at authenticating in-person credit and debit card transactions by using a fingerprint created by the individual magstripe on each card.

Visa Inc. and Fifth Third Bancorp are testing a novel technique at authenticating in-person credit and debit card transactions by using a fingerprint created by the individual magstripe on each card.From today's Credit Union Journal:

Visa Inc. and Fifth Third Bancorp are testing a system that evaluates the physical properties of the iron in the magnetic stripes on payment cards. The companies say these characteristics are different for every card and can function as a financial "fingerprint" that could prevent stolen account data from being used to produce counterfeit cards. "The right long-term goal is to make data unusable to criminals and therefore reduce the incentive to steal it," said Ellen Richey, Visa's chief enterprise risk officer.

The story then goes on to provide a little more detail into how the technology works:

Though criminals have devised ways to steal data stored on cards, the physical properties of the original card's stripe would not be duplicated if a criminal tried to copy stolen data onto a new card, Visa said. During a transaction, the terminals verify that the stripe is affiliated with the account number being used and then generate a one-time code to authenticate the transaction. Because the technology generates a new code for each purchase, issuers know that if they see the same code twice the second transaction is probably fraudulent. Because so much stolen card data is available, Roeber said it is important that banks "figure out a way to make that data of no value to the criminal."

A one-time transaction code is generated for each transaction, and the unique characteristics of the magnetic stripe is used, in conjunction with the account number to do so. Somehow, the algorithm generates a unique code for each transaction, and if the processor sees the same code twice that transaction can be flagged.

Seems, if the scheme works as purported, would raise the bar for fraudulent purchases using physically cloned cards. However, it doesn't look like it would provide much protection against man-in-the-middle attacks used to sniff the PIN and card data. But it could be a much more practical solution for merchants and the industry than attempting some encryption strategy that forces each retail location to manage encryption keys.

 

Recommended Reading:

Comment  | 
Print  | 
More Insights
Comments
Oldest First  |  Newest First  |  Threaded View
COVID-19: Latest Security News & Commentary
Dark Reading Staff 8/3/2020
'BootHole' Vulnerability Exposes Secure Boot Devices to Attack
Kelly Sheridan, Staff Editor, Dark Reading,  7/29/2020
Average Cost of a Data Breach: $3.86 Million
Jai Vijayan, Contributing Writer,  7/29/2020
Register for Dark Reading Newsletters
White Papers
Video
Cartoon Contest
Current Issue
Special Report: Computing's New Normal, a Dark Reading Perspective
This special report examines how IT security organizations have adapted to the "new normal" of computing and what the long-term effects will be. Read it and get a unique set of perspectives on issues ranging from new threats & vulnerabilities as a result of remote working to how enterprise security strategy will be affected long term.
Flash Poll
The Threat from the Internetand What Your Organization Can Do About It
The Threat from the Internetand What Your Organization Can Do About It
This report describes some of the latest attacks and threats emanating from the Internet, as well as advice and tips on how your organization can mitigate those threats before they affect your business. Download it today!
Twitter Feed
Dark Reading - Bug Report
Bug Report
Enterprise Vulnerabilities
From DHS/US-CERT's National Vulnerability Database
CVE-2017-18112
PUBLISHED: 2020-08-05
Affected versions of Atlassian Fisheye allow remote attackers to view the HTTP password of a repository via an Information Disclosure vulnerability in the logging feature. The affected versions are before version 4.8.3.
CVE-2020-15109
PUBLISHED: 2020-08-04
In solidus before versions 2.8.6, 2.9.6, and 2.10.2, there is an bility to change order address without triggering address validations. This vulnerability allows a malicious customer to craft request data with parameters that allow changing the address of the current order without changing the shipm...
CVE-2020-16847
PUBLISHED: 2020-08-04
Extreme Analytics in Extreme Management Center before 8.5.0.169 allows unauthenticated reflected XSS via a parameter in a GET request, aka CFD-4887.
CVE-2020-15135
PUBLISHED: 2020-08-04
save-server (npm package) before version 1.05 is affected by a CSRF vulnerability, as there is no CSRF mitigation (Tokens etc.). The fix introduced in version version 1.05 unintentionally breaks uploading so version v1.0.7 is the fixed version. This is patched by implementing Double submit. The CSRF...
CVE-2020-13522
PUBLISHED: 2020-08-04
An exploitable arbitrary file delete vulnerability exists in SoftPerfect RAM Disk 4.1 spvve.sys driver. A specially crafted I/O request packet (IRP) can allow an unprivileged user to delete any file on the filesystem. An attacker can send a malicious IRP to trigger this vulnerability.