Dark Reading is part of the Informa Tech Division of Informa PLC

This site is operated by a business or businesses owned by Informa PLC and all copyright resides with them.Informa PLC's registered office is 5 Howick Place, London SW1P 1WG. Registered in England and Wales. Number 8860726.

Risk

3/1/2010
10:29 AM
Keith Ferrell
Keith Ferrell
Commentary
50%
50%

App Insecurity: More Than Half Fail Security Tests First Time

Applications are where the action is, both for business productivity and, not at all coincidentally, for exploits. A new report from Veracode charges that 58% of reviewed apps flunked security tests the first time.

Applications are where the action is, both for business productivity and, not at all coincidentally, for exploits. A new report from Veracode charges that 58% of reviewed apps flunked security tests the first time.The Veracode State of Software Security report, (free download, registration required) might just take your breath away: 58% of the apps submitted for Veracode security testing and review contained exploitable vulnerabilities.

What's most breathtaking about this, from my perspective, is that these apps -- 1,600 of 'em, both commercial software and internally developed programs, including open source -- was the the fact that they were submitted to Veracode's security tests. The developers clearly felt confident that they'd covered their security bases.

Just as clearly, the confidence was misplaced.

According to Veracode's report, the most common vulnerability was susceptibility to Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) attacks.

The damning thing about the prevalence of persistent XSS and other common and well-known and well understood vulnerabilities is made clear in the report's blunt words:

"The pervasiveness of easily remedied vulnerabilities indicates a lack of developer education on secure coding."

Open source apps came off better than others, at least in terms of closing the security holes Veracode uncovered. While initial open source app submissions tended to suffer vulnerability levels similar to those of commercial apps, open source programs got fixed faster, as Veracode noted:

Open Source project teams remediated security vulnerabilities faster than all other users of Veracodes application risk management services platform. Open Source applications took only 36 days from first submission to reach an acceptable security score, compared to 48 days for Internally Developed applications and 82 days for Commercial applications. This is not surprising given the numerous political and organizational complexities of enterprise development efforts and the formal, customer-centric release plans of Commercial software vendors.

Customer-centrism, whatever the platform, is unavoidable, as is market-centrism and any other -ism you care to name; but Veracode's findings indicate that security-centrism had better move to the head of the list for all developers, and soon.

Comment  | 
Print  | 
More Insights
Comments
Newest First  |  Oldest First  |  Threaded View
Edge-DRsplash-10-edge-articles
7 Old IT Things Every New InfoSec Pro Should Know
Joan Goodchild, Staff Editor,  4/20/2021
News
Cloud-Native Businesses Struggle With Security
Robert Lemos, Contributing Writer,  5/6/2021
Commentary
Defending Against Web Scraping Attacks
Rob Simon, Principal Security Consultant at TrustedSec,  5/7/2021
Register for Dark Reading Newsletters
White Papers
Video
Cartoon
Current Issue
2021 Top Enterprise IT Trends
We've identified the key trends that are poised to impact the IT landscape in 2021. Find out why they're important and how they will affect you today!
Flash Poll
How Enterprises are Developing Secure Applications
How Enterprises are Developing Secure Applications
Recent breaches of third-party apps are driving many organizations to think harder about the security of their off-the-shelf software as they continue to move left in secure software development practices.
Twitter Feed
Dark Reading - Bug Report
Bug Report
Enterprise Vulnerabilities
From DHS/US-CERT's National Vulnerability Database
CVE-2020-16632
PUBLISHED: 2021-05-15
A XSS Vulnerability in /uploads/dede/action_search.php in DedeCMS V5.7 SP2 allows an authenticated user to execute remote arbitrary code via the keyword parameter.
CVE-2021-32073
PUBLISHED: 2021-05-15
DedeCMS V5.7 SP2 contains a CSRF vulnerability that allows a remote attacker to send a malicious request to to the web manager allowing remote code execution.
CVE-2021-33033
PUBLISHED: 2021-05-14
The Linux kernel before 5.11.14 has a use-after-free in cipso_v4_genopt in net/ipv4/cipso_ipv4.c because the CIPSO and CALIPSO refcounting for the DOI definitions is mishandled, aka CID-ad5d07f4a9cd. This leads to writing an arbitrary value.
CVE-2021-33034
PUBLISHED: 2021-05-14
In the Linux kernel before 5.12.4, net/bluetooth/hci_event.c has a use-after-free when destroying an hci_chan, aka CID-5c4c8c954409. This leads to writing an arbitrary value.
CVE-2019-25044
PUBLISHED: 2021-05-14
The block subsystem in the Linux kernel before 5.2 has a use-after-free that can lead to arbitrary code execution in the kernel context and privilege escalation, aka CID-c3e2219216c9. This is related to blk_mq_free_rqs and blk_cleanup_queue.