Dark Reading is part of the Informa Tech Division of Informa PLC

This site is operated by a business or businesses owned by Informa PLC and all copyright resides with them.Informa PLC's registered office is 5 Howick Place, London SW1P 1WG. Registered in England and Wales. Number 8860726.

Analytics

Researchers Fear Reprisals From Storm

Massive botnet can launch denial-of-service attacks on those who threaten it

A warning to those who might try to stop the Storm worm: Be prepared for a counterattack.

Researchers say they have heard of several instances in which Storm -- the infamous botnet created by a widespread worm/Trojan distributed across the Internet -- has successfully launched reprisals against those who try to break it.

"This is the first time that I can remember ever seeing researchers who were actually afraid of an investigating an exploit," said Josh Corman, principal security strategist at IBM's Internet Security Systems unit, in an interview last week at Interop New York.

"The bad news about Storm is that it fights back," said Shane Coursen, senior technical consultant at Kaspersky Lab, during a session at the conference. "There have been cases in which a researcher was discovered, and within five seconds, he had a DDOS attack from 10,000 bots."

It's not clear whether Storm's reprisals are automated or manual, says Joe Stewart, a researcher at SecureWorks who has been studying Storm since it first emerged at the beginning of this year. "They could be triggered by behavior that's typical of a researcher, or they could be the result of someone studying logs and launching an attack in response," he says.

Storm can collect IP addresses of end users via HTTP and analyze them, Stewart notes. Researchers can use proxies, but if they are discovered, a DDOS counterattack might target the proxy, and innocent users might get hurt, he says.

Corman said that Storm's potential as a launching pad for DDOS attacks is enormous. "It hasn't been used that way yet, but the potential is there," he said. "If they wanted to take out a different financial institution every week, they could do it." Corman believes that estimates showing Storm at 50 million nodes are wildly inaccurate, but he believes that the botnet may be as big as 9 million nodes. (See Storm Worm Botnet Attacks Anti-Spam Firms.)

Stewart disagrees, stating that Storm "was never more than 1 million nodes," and likely is significantly smaller now that Microsoft and others have launched efforts to restrict its growth. "That's still more than enough to cause some serious problems," he notes.

Aside from potential reprisals, Storm worries researchers because it is a different sort of botnet that operates on a peer-to-peer basis, uses encryption, and is capable of synchronizing its attacks, Stewart says. "It works like a commercial product," he says. "If you were to study botnets and botnet creation in a textbook, this would be the one you would study."

Yet, despite its potential as a DDOS weapon, Stewart doesn't think Storm will frequently be used for such attacks. "I think it will continue to be used as it's being used now, for spam and pump-and-dump [stock] schemes," he says. "It wouldn't pay for the operators of Storm to do anything that would get them more attention, because then more resources will be turned to stop them. They want to keep operating under the radar."

Even if Storm's operators maintain a low profile, however, they will likely continue to see new researchers -- and take action against them. Storm has already been used on universities and anti-spam sites such as Spamhaus, according to reports. (See Storm Botnet Puts Up Defenses, Attacks Back.)

"If you're looking into it, be ready," said Corman.

Have a comment on this story? Please click "Discuss" below. If you'd like to contact Dark Reading's editors directly, send us a message.

  • Kaspersky Lab
  • SecureWorks Inc.
  • IBM Internet Security Systems

    Tim Wilson is Editor in Chief and co-founder of Dark Reading.com, UBM Tech's online community for information security professionals. He is responsible for managing the site, assigning and editing content, and writing breaking news stories. Wilson has been recognized as one ... View Full Bio

    Comment  | 
    Print  | 
    More Insights
  • Comments
    Newest First  |  Oldest First  |  Threaded View
    Cybersecurity Team Holiday Guide: 2019 Gag Gift Edition
    Ericka Chickowski, Contributing Writer,  12/2/2019
    Register for Dark Reading Newsletters
    White Papers
    Video
    Cartoon Contest
    Current Issue
    Navigating the Deluge of Security Data
    In this Tech Digest, Dark Reading shares the experiences of some top security practitioners as they navigate volumes of security data. We examine some examples of how enterprises can cull this data to find the clues they need.
    Flash Poll
    Rethinking Enterprise Data Defense
    Rethinking Enterprise Data Defense
    Frustrated with recurring intrusions and breaches, cybersecurity professionals are questioning some of the industrys conventional wisdom. Heres a look at what theyre thinking about.
    Twitter Feed
    Dark Reading - Bug Report
    Bug Report
    Enterprise Vulnerabilities
    From DHS/US-CERT's National Vulnerability Database
    CVE-2019-19647
    PUBLISHED: 2019-12-09
    radare2 through 4.0.0 lacks validation of the content variable in the function r_asm_pseudo_incbin at libr/asm/asm.c, ultimately leading to an arbitrary write. This allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (application crash) or possibly have unspecified other impact via crafted input.
    CVE-2019-19648
    PUBLISHED: 2019-12-09
    In the macho_parse_file functionality in macho/macho.c of YARA 3.11.0, command_size may be inconsistent with the real size. A specially crafted MachO file can cause an out-of-bounds memory access, resulting in Denial of Service (application crash) or potential code execution.
    CVE-2019-19642
    PUBLISHED: 2019-12-08
    On SuperMicro X8STi-F motherboards with IPMI firmware 2.06 and BIOS 02.68, the Virtual Media feature allows OS Command Injection by authenticated attackers who can send HTTP requests to the IPMI IP address. This requires a POST to /rpc/setvmdrive.asp with shell metacharacters in ShareHost or ShareNa...
    CVE-2019-19637
    PUBLISHED: 2019-12-08
    An issue was discovered in libsixel 1.8.2. There is an integer overflow in the function sixel_decode_raw_impl at fromsixel.c.
    CVE-2019-19638
    PUBLISHED: 2019-12-08
    An issue was discovered in libsixel 1.8.2. There is a heap-based buffer overflow in the function load_pnm at frompnm.c, due to an integer overflow.