Dark Reading is part of the Informa Tech Division of Informa PLC

This site is operated by a business or businesses owned by Informa PLC and all copyright resides with them.Informa PLC's registered office is 5 Howick Place, London SW1P 1WG. Registered in England and Wales. Number 8860726.

Analytics

Researchers Fear Reprisals From Storm

Massive botnet can launch denial-of-service attacks on those who threaten it

A warning to those who might try to stop the Storm worm: Be prepared for a counterattack.

Researchers say they have heard of several instances in which Storm -- the infamous botnet created by a widespread worm/Trojan distributed across the Internet -- has successfully launched reprisals against those who try to break it.

"This is the first time that I can remember ever seeing researchers who were actually afraid of an investigating an exploit," said Josh Corman, principal security strategist at IBM's Internet Security Systems unit, in an interview last week at Interop New York.

"The bad news about Storm is that it fights back," said Shane Coursen, senior technical consultant at Kaspersky Lab, during a session at the conference. "There have been cases in which a researcher was discovered, and within five seconds, he had a DDOS attack from 10,000 bots."

It's not clear whether Storm's reprisals are automated or manual, says Joe Stewart, a researcher at SecureWorks who has been studying Storm since it first emerged at the beginning of this year. "They could be triggered by behavior that's typical of a researcher, or they could be the result of someone studying logs and launching an attack in response," he says.

Storm can collect IP addresses of end users via HTTP and analyze them, Stewart notes. Researchers can use proxies, but if they are discovered, a DDOS counterattack might target the proxy, and innocent users might get hurt, he says.

Corman said that Storm's potential as a launching pad for DDOS attacks is enormous. "It hasn't been used that way yet, but the potential is there," he said. "If they wanted to take out a different financial institution every week, they could do it." Corman believes that estimates showing Storm at 50 million nodes are wildly inaccurate, but he believes that the botnet may be as big as 9 million nodes. (See Storm Worm Botnet Attacks Anti-Spam Firms.)

Stewart disagrees, stating that Storm "was never more than 1 million nodes," and likely is significantly smaller now that Microsoft and others have launched efforts to restrict its growth. "That's still more than enough to cause some serious problems," he notes.

Aside from potential reprisals, Storm worries researchers because it is a different sort of botnet that operates on a peer-to-peer basis, uses encryption, and is capable of synchronizing its attacks, Stewart says. "It works like a commercial product," he says. "If you were to study botnets and botnet creation in a textbook, this would be the one you would study."

Yet, despite its potential as a DDOS weapon, Stewart doesn't think Storm will frequently be used for such attacks. "I think it will continue to be used as it's being used now, for spam and pump-and-dump [stock] schemes," he says. "It wouldn't pay for the operators of Storm to do anything that would get them more attention, because then more resources will be turned to stop them. They want to keep operating under the radar."

Even if Storm's operators maintain a low profile, however, they will likely continue to see new researchers -- and take action against them. Storm has already been used on universities and anti-spam sites such as Spamhaus, according to reports. (See Storm Botnet Puts Up Defenses, Attacks Back.)

"If you're looking into it, be ready," said Corman.

Have a comment on this story? Please click "Discuss" below. If you'd like to contact Dark Reading's editors directly, send us a message.

  • Kaspersky Lab
  • SecureWorks Inc.
  • IBM Internet Security Systems

    Tim Wilson is Editor in Chief and co-founder of Dark Reading.com, UBM Tech's online community for information security professionals. He is responsible for managing the site, assigning and editing content, and writing breaking news stories. Wilson has been recognized as one ... View Full Bio

    Comment  | 
    Print  | 
    More Insights
  • Comments
    Newest First  |  Oldest First  |  Threaded View
    97% of Americans Can't Ace a Basic Security Test
    Steve Zurier, Contributing Writer,  5/20/2019
    How Security Vendors Can Address the Cybersecurity Talent Shortage
    Rob Rashotte, VP of Global Training and Technical Field Enablement at Fortinet,  5/24/2019
    TeamViewer Admits Breach from 2016
    Dark Reading Staff 5/20/2019
    Register for Dark Reading Newsletters
    White Papers
    Video
    Cartoon Contest
    Current Issue
    Building and Managing an IT Security Operations Program
    As cyber threats grow, many organizations are building security operations centers (SOCs) to improve their defenses. In this Tech Digest you will learn tips on how to get the most out of a SOC in your organization - and what to do if you can't afford to build one.
    Flash Poll
    Twitter Feed
    Dark Reading - Bug Report
    Bug Report
    Enterprise Vulnerabilities
    From DHS/US-CERT's National Vulnerability Database
    CVE-2019-7068
    PUBLISHED: 2019-05-24
    Adobe Acrobat and Reader versions 2019.010.20069 and earlier, 2019.010.20069 and earlier, 2017.011.30113 and earlier version, and 2015.006.30464 and earlier have an use after free vulnerability. Successful exploitation could lead to arbitrary code execution .
    CVE-2019-7069
    PUBLISHED: 2019-05-24
    Adobe Acrobat and Reader versions 2019.010.20069 and earlier, 2019.010.20069 and earlier, 2017.011.30113 and earlier version, and 2015.006.30464 and earlier have a type confusion vulnerability. Successful exploitation could lead to arbitrary code execution .
    CVE-2019-7070
    PUBLISHED: 2019-05-24
    Adobe Acrobat and Reader versions 2019.010.20069 and earlier, 2019.010.20069 and earlier, 2017.011.30113 and earlier version, and 2015.006.30464 and earlier have an use after free vulnerability. Successful exploitation could lead to arbitrary code execution .
    CVE-2019-7071
    PUBLISHED: 2019-05-24
    Adobe Acrobat and Reader versions 2019.010.20069 and earlier, 2019.010.20069 and earlier, 2017.011.30113 and earlier version, and 2015.006.30464 and earlier have an out-of-bounds read vulnerability. Successful exploitation could lead to information disclosure.
    CVE-2019-7072
    PUBLISHED: 2019-05-24
    Adobe Acrobat and Reader versions 2019.010.20069 and earlier, 2019.010.20069 and earlier, 2017.011.30113 and earlier version, and 2015.006.30464 and earlier have an use after free vulnerability. Successful exploitation could lead to arbitrary code execution .