Dark Reading is part of the Informa Tech Division of Informa PLC

This site is operated by a business or businesses owned by Informa PLC and all copyright resides with them.Informa PLC's registered office is 5 Howick Place, London SW1P 1WG. Registered in England and Wales. Number 8860726.

News & Commentary

5/8/2018
02:00 PM
Jeremy Wittkop
Jeremy Wittkop
Commentary
Connect Directly
LinkedIn
RSS
E-Mail vvv

Properly Framing the Cost of a Data Breach

The expenses and actions typically associated with a cyberattack are not all created equal. Here's how to explain what's important to the C-suite and board.
1 of 2

Comment  | 
Print  | 
Comments
Newest First  |  Oldest First  |  Threaded View
managedoutsource
50%
50%
managedoutsource,
User Rank: Apprentice
6/18/2018 | 5:01:35 AM
Thank you for sharing
While all kinds of data breach can be expensive, it was great for this article to break this down for better understanding.
jeremy_wittkop
100%
0%
jeremy_wittkop,
User Rank: Author
5/9/2018 | 2:58:01 PM
Re: All good points .... but
Thank you for the comment! I understand the frustration when ridiculous comments such as that are made by members of leadership who should know that if one individual can cause the entire program to fail, it is the program that is broken. I also understand the frustration of the general public when Equifax's board of directors were re-elected after the breach. I would suggest that the root of the problem with Equifax is that they have a business model that is compulsory for data subjects. These types of issues are the reason that data privacy regulations are being passed in major markets around the world.

I would suggest from my conversations with executive leadership that organizations that must ask for permission from data subjects to gather their information and who ultimately must win their business, that those organizations are much more sensitive to how they handle personal information. Ultimately, we are in a consumer-driven economy. If the general public decides that they ways in which companies secure their personal data will impact their purchasing decisions, the business community will identify those trends and respond accordingly.
REISEN1955
100%
0%
REISEN1955,
User Rank: Ninja
5/8/2018 | 2:22:01 PM
All good points .... but
Remember the attitude of the Equifax C-Suite when the CEO blamed the entire catastrophe on ONE, JUST ONE, IT staffer who failed to perform an update.  Lunacy and ignorance all combined into one stupid comment.  If THIS is the attitude and understanding C-Suite has of IT as a business practice, then all your points are worthless.  Oh, BTW - staffers are always cheaper in Bangalore too. 
COVID-19: Latest Security News & Commentary
Dark Reading Staff 8/14/2020
Lock-Pickers Face an Uncertain Future Online
Seth Rosenblatt, Contributing Writer,  8/10/2020
Hacking It as a CISO: Advice for Security Leadership
Kelly Sheridan, Staff Editor, Dark Reading,  8/10/2020
Register for Dark Reading Newsletters
White Papers
Video
Cartoon
Current Issue
7 New Cybersecurity Vulnerabilities That Could Put Your Enterprise at Risk
In this Dark Reading Tech Digest, we look at the ways security researchers and ethical hackers find critical vulnerabilities and offer insights into how you can fix them before attackers can exploit them.
Flash Poll
The Changing Face of Threat Intelligence
The Changing Face of Threat Intelligence
This special report takes a look at how enterprises are using threat intelligence, as well as emerging best practices for integrating threat intel into security operations and incident response. Download it today!
Twitter Feed
Dark Reading - Bug Report
Bug Report
Enterprise Vulnerabilities
From DHS/US-CERT's National Vulnerability Database
CVE-2020-17475
PUBLISHED: 2020-08-14
Lack of authentication in the network relays used in MEGVII Koala 2.9.1-c3s allows attackers to grant physical access to anyone by sending packet data to UDP port 5000.
CVE-2020-0255
PUBLISHED: 2020-08-14
** REJECT ** DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: CVE-2020-10751. Reason: This candidate is a duplicate of CVE-2020-10751. Notes: All CVE users should reference CVE-2020-10751 instead of this candidate. All references and descriptions in this candidate have been removed to prevent accidenta...
CVE-2020-14353
PUBLISHED: 2020-08-14
** REJECT ** DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: CVE-2017-18270. Reason: This candidate is a duplicate of CVE-2017-18270. Notes: All CVE users should reference CVE-2017-18270 instead of this candidate. All references and descriptions in this candidate have been removed to prevent accidenta...
CVE-2020-17464
PUBLISHED: 2020-08-14
** REJECT ** DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: This candidate was withdrawn by its CNA. Further investigation showed that it was not a security issue. Notes: none.
CVE-2020-17473
PUBLISHED: 2020-08-14
Lack of mutual authentication in ZKTeco FaceDepot 7B 1.0.213 and ZKBiosecurity Server 1.0.0_20190723 allows an attacker to obtain a long-lasting token by impersonating the server.