Dark Reading is part of the Informa Tech Division of Informa PLC

This site is operated by a business or businesses owned by Informa PLC and all copyright resides with them.Informa PLC's registered office is 5 Howick Place, London SW1P 1WG. Registered in England and Wales. Number 8860726.

News

3/15/2019
11:00 AM
Robert Lemos
Robert Lemos
News
50%
50%

Proof-of-Concept Tracking System Finds RATs Worldwide

Using a combination of Shodan scans and data from partners, Recorded Future finds nearly 500 malware controllers for 14 different families of remote-access Trojans, as well as the corporate networks they have infected.

A proof-of-concept system designed to detect remote-access Trojans (RATs) using only network data uncovered infections at companies in a variety of industries, according to a report released this week by information analysis firm Recorded Future.

Using only network scans and metadata collected between Dec. 2, 2018, and Jan. 8, 2019, Recorded Future uncovered 481 command-and-control (C2) servers used by attackers to manage computer systems compromised by 14 different families of RATs. In the report, which focused on three particular Trojans — Emotet, Xtreme RAT, and ZeroAccess — the company found nearly 20 command-and-control (C2) servers managing Emotet infections, more than 30 managing ZeroAccess infections, and nearly 70 managing xTreme RAT infections.

The detected servers only comprise a fraction of the total remote-access threat on the Internet because the technique cannot find every  server, says John TerBush, senior threat researcher with the Insikt Group at Recorded Future. Still, the hundreds of C2 servers indicate a large problem, he stresses.

"There are a lot of RAT types out there that are quite successful," he says. "They can be pretty good at evading security detections through a variety of ways. They are not something that will be easy gotten rid of unless you are at the top of your game."

The detection of hundreds of C2 servers for RATs highlights the continuing threat and how far online attackers have infiltrated corporate networks. Once attackers have compromised a single system inside a network, they have a beachhead from where they can steal data, install additional functionality, or infect other systems.

"They create pivot points in your environment," TerBush says. "They can sit there and gather information from the host you are on, they can download other files, or they can use it as a pivot point for lateral movement. Some of them are simpler than others and not as useful, but there are a lot of variants with a lot of functionality."

The 19 servers managing Emotet, for example, communicated with infected systems in at least 26 organizations, mainly in Latin America, Recorded Future stated in its report. The RAT, originally discovered by security firms in 2014 when it delivered banking malware, now focuses on a variety of industries, such as automative, energy, construction, retail, and utilities. The focus on Latin America is a contrast to the first half of 2018, when Emotet mainly focused on targets in the United States.

Emotet evolved in 2018, moving from a RAT focused on the banking sector to a program that is used as a first-stage infector, which then can drop a variety of different modules onto a system.

Emotet is the most recently developed malware of the three on which Recorded Future focused the report. Both the Xtreme RAT and ZeroAccess malware are about a decade old, but they are still very popular. In its "2018 Botnet Trends" report, for example, network-security firm Fortinet found ZeroAccess to be the third most popular botnet on the Internet for the year.

Overall, security firms are finding that Trojans have more than doubled in the past year. While attackers use the infected networks for their own schemes, they also often install other groups' malware as a service or just sell the ability to access corporate servers to nation-states and other aggressors.

The capability to find RATs using network metadata could help companies detect further threats in their networks. While TerBush would not further detail Recorded Future's "secret sauce," a technique using only network scans and metadata would allow firms to more easily identify and block malicious network traffic.

TerBush stressed that the technique is not comprehensive but finds more than the low-hanging fruit.

"There is some proprietary data that is public network metadata that then gives us a bunch of IPs that are then connecting to those command-and-control servers," he says. "So we can specifically identify what is likely — it's hard to get 100% certainty — but what is likely based on port, connectivity, and time and that sort of thing likely installs connecting to the command servers."

As part of the report, Recorded Future released the IP addresses of the C2 servers and the indicators of compromise for the RATs. The company recommended that firms look for communications to those IP addresses in their logs. 

Related Content

 

 

Join Dark Reading LIVE for two cybersecurity summits at Interop 2019. Learn from the industry's most knowledgeable IT security experts. Check out the Interop agenda here.

Veteran technology journalist of more than 20 years. Former research engineer. Written for more than two dozen publications, including CNET News.com, Dark Reading, MIT's Technology Review, Popular Science, and Wired News. Five awards for journalism, including Best Deadline ... View Full Bio

Comment  | 
Print  | 
More Insights
Comments
Newest First  |  Oldest First  |  Threaded View
97% of Americans Can't Ace a Basic Security Test
Steve Zurier, Contributing Writer,  5/20/2019
TeamViewer Admits Breach from 2016
Dark Reading Staff 5/20/2019
How a Manufacturing Firm Recovered from a Devastating Ransomware Attack
Kelly Jackson Higgins, Executive Editor at Dark Reading,  5/20/2019
Register for Dark Reading Newsletters
White Papers
Video
Cartoon Contest
Write a Caption, Win a Starbucks Card! Click Here
Latest Comment: This comment is waiting for review by our moderators.
Current Issue
Building and Managing an IT Security Operations Program
As cyber threats grow, many organizations are building security operations centers (SOCs) to improve their defenses. In this Tech Digest you will learn tips on how to get the most out of a SOC in your organization - and what to do if you can't afford to build one.
Flash Poll
Twitter Feed
Dark Reading - Bug Report
Bug Report
Enterprise Vulnerabilities
From DHS/US-CERT's National Vulnerability Database
CVE-2019-7844
PUBLISHED: 2019-05-22
Adobe Media Encoder version 13.0.2 has an out-of-bounds read vulnerability. Successful exploitation could lead to information disclosure.
CVE-2017-9809
PUBLISHED: 2019-05-22
OX Software GmbH OX App Suite 7.8.4 and earlier is affected by: Information Exposure.
CVE-2018-12886
PUBLISHED: 2019-05-22
stack_protect_prologue in cfgexpand.c and stack_protect_epilogue in function.c in GNU Compiler Collection (GCC) 4.1 through 8 (under certain circumstances) generate instruction sequences when targeting ARM targets that spill the address of the stack protector guard, which allows an attacker to bypas...
CVE-2019-7834
PUBLISHED: 2019-05-22
Adobe Acrobat and Reader versions 2019.010.20100 and earlier, 2019.010.20099 and earlier, 2017.011.30140 and earlier, 2017.011.30138 and earlier, 2015.006.30495 and earlier, and 2015.006.30493 and earlier have a use after free vulnerability. Successful exploitation could lead to arbitrary code execu...
CVE-2019-7835
PUBLISHED: 2019-05-22
Adobe Acrobat and Reader versions 2019.010.20100 and earlier, 2019.010.20099 and earlier, 2017.011.30140 and earlier version, 2017.011.30138 and earlier, 2015.006.30495 and earlier, and 2015.006.30493 and earlier have a use after free vulnerability. Successful exploitation could lead to arbitrary co...