Dark Reading is part of the Informa Tech Division of Informa PLC

This site is operated by a business or businesses owned by Informa PLC and all copyright resides with them.Informa PLC's registered office is 5 Howick Place, London SW1P 1WG. Registered in England and Wales. Number 8860726.

Analytics

6/25/2013
02:56 PM
Dark Reading
Dark Reading
Products and Releases
50%
50%

Ponemon Survey: Majority Of Organizations Committed To Risk-Based Security Management

Protection of intellectual property a key business objectives for 88 percent of respondents

PORTLAND, OREGON -- June 25, 2013 -- Tripwire, Inc., a leading global provider of risk-based security and compliance management solutions, today announced the first installment of an extensive survey on the state of risk-based security management with the Ponemon Institute©. The survey covers risk-based security management program governance and maturity and includes 749 U.S. and 571 U.K. respondents from the following areas: IT security, IT operations, IT risk management, business operations, compliance/internal audit and enterprise risk management.

"The findings from this report strongly indicate that risk-based security management is still viewed as an IT or security task instead of a business task," noted Dr. Larry Ponemon, chairman and founder of the Ponemon Institute. "Unfortunately, the full value of a risk-based approach to security can only be realized when senior business leaders fully participate in the process."

Key findings from the survey include:

81% rated their organization's commitment to risk-based security management as 'significant' or 'very significant'

88% identified the protection of intellectual property and 78% identified the minimization of non-compliance as a key business objectives for risk-based security programs

60% say that risk-based security management helps align security programs with business objectives

However:

46% say their organization's approach or strategy for risk-based security management is non-existent or 'ad-hoc'

62% say that the business has little or no input involvement in providing risk-based analysis

47% don't have a risk-based security management program or most program activities have not been deployed

Only 29% have a security risk management strategy that is applied consistently across the enterprise

"There's a big gap between risk-based security program commitment and how organizations are actually operating," noted Elizabeth Ireland, vice president of product marketing for Tripwire. "This could be because many organizations haven't fully connected the importance of their cyber security program to their top-level business risks despite the rapid increase in cyber security threats."

The complete survey results will be released in five parts over the next two months and will cover the following topics:

Risk-based security management maturity and governance

The value of risk-based security metrics

Key metrics for risk-based security

Risk-based security controls and spending

Risk-based security collaboration, communication and culture

For more information about the survey please visit: http://www.tripwire.com/ponemon/2013/#maturity.

About the Ponemon Institute

The Ponemon Institute© is dedicated to advancing responsible information and privacy management practices in business and government. To achieve this objective, the Institute conducts independent research, educates leaders from the private and public sectors, and verifies the privacy and data protection practices of organizations in a variety of industries.

About Tripwire

Tripwire is a leading global provider of risk-based security and compliance management solutions, enabling enterprises, government agencies and service providers to effectively connect security to their business. Tripwire provides the broadest set of foundational security controls including security configuration management, vulnerability management, file integrity monitoring, log and event management. Tripwire solutions deliver unprecedented visibility, business context and security business intelligence allowing extended enterprises to protect sensitive data from breaches, vulnerabilities, and threats. Learn more at www.tripwire.com or follow us @TripwireInc on Twitter.

Comment  | 
Print  | 
More Insights
Comments
Threaded  |  Newest First  |  Oldest First
Navigating Security in the Cloud
Diya Jolly, Chief Product Officer, Okta,  12/4/2019
Register for Dark Reading Newsletters
White Papers
Video
Cartoon Contest
Current Issue
Navigating the Deluge of Security Data
In this Tech Digest, Dark Reading shares the experiences of some top security practitioners as they navigate volumes of security data. We examine some examples of how enterprises can cull this data to find the clues they need.
Flash Poll
Rethinking Enterprise Data Defense
Rethinking Enterprise Data Defense
Frustrated with recurring intrusions and breaches, cybersecurity professionals are questioning some of the industrys conventional wisdom. Heres a look at what theyre thinking about.
Twitter Feed
Dark Reading - Bug Report
Bug Report
Enterprise Vulnerabilities
From DHS/US-CERT's National Vulnerability Database
CVE-2019-19642
PUBLISHED: 2019-12-08
On SuperMicro X8STi-F motherboards with IPMI firmware 2.06 and BIOS 02.68, the Virtual Media feature allows OS Command Injection by authenticated attackers who can send HTTP requests to the IPMI IP address. This requires a POST to /rpc/setvmdrive.asp with shell metacharacters in ShareHost or ShareNa...
CVE-2019-19637
PUBLISHED: 2019-12-08
An issue was discovered in libsixel 1.8.2. There is an integer overflow in the function sixel_decode_raw_impl at fromsixel.c.
CVE-2019-19638
PUBLISHED: 2019-12-08
An issue was discovered in libsixel 1.8.2. There is a heap-based buffer overflow in the function load_pnm at frompnm.c, due to an integer overflow.
CVE-2019-19635
PUBLISHED: 2019-12-08
An issue was discovered in libsixel 1.8.2. There is a heap-based buffer overflow in the function sixel_decode_raw_impl at fromsixel.c.
CVE-2019-19636
PUBLISHED: 2019-12-08
An issue was discovered in libsixel 1.8.2. There is an integer overflow in the function sixel_encode_body at tosixel.c.