Dark Reading is part of the Informa Tech Division of Informa PLC

This site is operated by a business or businesses owned by Informa PLC and all copyright resides with them.Informa PLC's registered office is 5 Howick Place, London SW1P 1WG. Registered in England and Wales. Number 8860726.

Perimeter

7/13/2020
06:35 PM
50%
50%

Zero-Trust Efforts Rise with the Tide of Remote Working

With employees likely to continue to spend much, if not all, of their time working from home, companies are focusing more on technologies to boost the security of their now-distributed workplace.

With coronavirus infections continuing to rise in many areas of the United States, remote work will remain in the future for most companies, leading business leaders to speed adoption of a variety of distributed security measures. 

In particular, the model of zero trust has gained momentum, moving from a possible approach to security to a necessary piece of surviving in the future. Underscoring that, more than 70% of organizations indicate that they are considering adopting a zero-trust model for security following the pandemic and the move to extensive remote work, according to a survey conducted by virtual private networking firm NetMotion Software.

The zero-trust framework, which treats every part of the IT infrastructure — users, devices, services, and data — as potentially compromised, has become a necessary approach to post-pandemic business, says Christopher Kenessey, the firm's CEO.

"The perimeter model worked because you had your protections and your corporate assets and your employees all behind your firewalls," he says. "But now a good chunk of your critical assets are behind the firewall, but all your employees are not, so you're missing a big part of the picture."

Last year, the concept of zero trust had already started to gain interest, driven by businesses relying more on cloud services, employees looking to work from anywhere, and executive seeking to digital transform their companies. Most organizations did not have the technology in place to secure remote devices with constant authentication nor the level of visibility necessary to monitor the security of mobile devices operating outside their corporate firewall.

Yet, with the pandemic came remote work, and with remote work came more threats. A survey in May conducted by the Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Upwork, and Stanford University found that more than 50% of workers were working from home, compared with only 15% before the pandemic. Meanwhile, a separate survey by NetMotion found that employees clicked on 49% more risky URLs in the month to June 19 compared with January 2020.

"Because zero trust is a philosophy, you have to think about people and processes before you get to the technology," says Rik Turner, principal analyst for cybersecurity at market researcher Omdia, a sister company to Dark Reading. "You need to be able to make sure that the human beings and contractors, whether all of those potential users can be granted minimal access rights and monitored through the life of the session."

While an analyst at Forrester Research coined the term zero trust in 2010, the concept was widely used in military agencies the decade before, and many of the pillars of the framework came out of the Jericho Forum, a group of companies that banded together in 2004 to discuss the IT-security trend of the collapsing perimeter. 

Yet the technology gained adherents over the last two years, as many companies sought digital transformation that allowed for mobile workers, extensive cloud infrastructure, and global operations. 

However, not until remote work became the norm for many workers did the need for a decentralized security model really hit home, says NetMotion's Kenessey. More than three-quarters of firms consider securing remote access to be the top spending priority, and while only 10% of firms had little-to-no visibility into remote workers' security, more than half of security teams were still dissatisfied with their level of visibility, according to the NetMotion report

"Overnight, everyone had to take this seriously and scale up their infrastructure around remote access," he says. "They are going to have to treat remote access as a necessity from an investment standpoint for the near future."

While workers are focused on getting their work done in the new remote world, security professionals struggle to keep them secure. Nearly 90% of remote workers have had trouble accessing applications and data remotely. The greatest concerns for security teams are employees visiting risky URLs or phishing sites, accessing inappropriate content on work devices, and connecting to insecure Wi-Fi networks, according to the NetMotion report.

"The tools and applications that have worked best inside an office environment may not work for decentralized workforce," the report states. "Likewise, the firewalls and other security infrastructure that protects office workers doesn't extend well to remote workers."

With more than three-quarters of firms still having four or more on-premises applications that remote workers need to access, virtual private networks will likely not go away, the report adds. But the pandemic has put more urgency into efforts to create a more efficient and secure infrastructure for remote workers.

Related Content:

 

 

Register now for this year's fully virtual Black Hat USA, scheduled to take place August 1–6, and get more information about the event on the Black Hat website. Click for detail on conference information and to register.

Veteran technology journalist of more than 20 years. Former research engineer. Written for more than two dozen publications, including CNET News.com, Dark Reading, MIT's Technology Review, Popular Science, and Wired News. Five awards for journalism, including Best Deadline ... View Full Bio
 

Recommended Reading:

Comment  | 
Print  | 
More Insights
Comments
Newest First  |  Oldest First  |  Threaded View
COVID-19: Latest Security News & Commentary
Dark Reading Staff 8/3/2020
'BootHole' Vulnerability Exposes Secure Boot Devices to Attack
Kelly Sheridan, Staff Editor, Dark Reading,  7/29/2020
Average Cost of a Data Breach: $3.86 Million
Jai Vijayan, Contributing Writer,  7/29/2020
Register for Dark Reading Newsletters
White Papers
Video
Cartoon Contest
Current Issue
Special Report: Computing's New Normal, a Dark Reading Perspective
This special report examines how IT security organizations have adapted to the "new normal" of computing and what the long-term effects will be. Read it and get a unique set of perspectives on issues ranging from new threats & vulnerabilities as a result of remote working to how enterprise security strategy will be affected long term.
Flash Poll
The Threat from the Internetand What Your Organization Can Do About It
The Threat from the Internetand What Your Organization Can Do About It
This report describes some of the latest attacks and threats emanating from the Internet, as well as advice and tips on how your organization can mitigate those threats before they affect your business. Download it today!
Twitter Feed
Dark Reading - Bug Report
Bug Report
Enterprise Vulnerabilities
From DHS/US-CERT's National Vulnerability Database
CVE-2017-18112
PUBLISHED: 2020-08-05
Affected versions of Atlassian Fisheye allow remote attackers to view the HTTP password of a repository via an Information Disclosure vulnerability in the logging feature. The affected versions are before version 4.8.3.
CVE-2020-15109
PUBLISHED: 2020-08-04
In solidus before versions 2.8.6, 2.9.6, and 2.10.2, there is an bility to change order address without triggering address validations. This vulnerability allows a malicious customer to craft request data with parameters that allow changing the address of the current order without changing the shipm...
CVE-2020-16847
PUBLISHED: 2020-08-04
Extreme Analytics in Extreme Management Center before 8.5.0.169 allows unauthenticated reflected XSS via a parameter in a GET request, aka CFD-4887.
CVE-2020-15135
PUBLISHED: 2020-08-04
save-server (npm package) before version 1.05 is affected by a CSRF vulnerability, as there is no CSRF mitigation (Tokens etc.). The fix introduced in version version 1.05 unintentionally breaks uploading so version v1.0.7 is the fixed version. This is patched by implementing Double submit. The CSRF...
CVE-2020-13522
PUBLISHED: 2020-08-04
An exploitable arbitrary file delete vulnerability exists in SoftPerfect RAM Disk 4.1 spvve.sys driver. A specially crafted I/O request packet (IRP) can allow an unprivileged user to delete any file on the filesystem. An attacker can send a malicious IRP to trigger this vulnerability.