Dark Reading is part of the Informa Tech Division of Informa PLC

This site is operated by a business or businesses owned by Informa PLC and all copyright resides with them.Informa PLC's registered office is 5 Howick Place, London SW1P 1WG. Registered in England and Wales. Number 8860726.

Perimeter

2/19/2016
01:30 PM
Connect Directly
Twitter
RSS
E-Mail
50%
50%

Web Gateways Need Backstops

New report emphasizes the importance of layered defense.

A new report out this week showed how permeable network gateway protections can be on their own. In a 10-month study of 200 billion communications over one million client devices, Securlert took a deep dive look into the types of malicious activities that initially got past eight leading web gateway products. While some performed better than others, the conclusion was that there were still plenty of threats getting through this layer of defense.

The study looked at whether the gateways were allowing infected, internal devices to communicate outside of the organization to their perpetrators. According to the researchers, almost all of the environments studied were running sophisticated perimeter defense systems that included a secure web gateway and/or next generation firewall, an IPS/IDS, plus fully functioning endpoint protection and SIEM correlation.

According to the report, more than half of the gateways studied allowed more than 40% of the attempted malicious outbound communications to successfully reach C&C servers. And overall, 40% of all attempted malicious communication managed to beat the web gateways in question.

"Today’s enterprises are unknowingly allowing malicious outbound communication to be transmitted through their web gateways on a daily basis,” said Richard Greene, Seculert CEO.

According to the recent IWK Strategic Security Survey, while firewalls remain the security product most valued by security professionals -- 62% of them put them in their top three -- gateway antivirus or anti-malware is only similarly valued by about 12% of security professionals.

Seculert didn't name and shame specific vendors for their performance, but did show through anonymized data that there was definitely a range of performance levels across the technologies. For example, one particular gateway let 50 percent of connected and infected devices communicate with C&C servers, and allowed an average of 350 communications per incident. Whereas another only allowed about 5% of devices to communicate outbound and only had an average of 50 communications in those rare incidents let through. Across all products, the average number of successful outbound communications per incident was over 100.

Interestingly, the report noted that almost all of the gateways showed uneven performance. For example, what might have been seen as good blocking for weeks or months changed after some attack technique enabled adversaries to beat the technology during a different period of time.

The lessons are likely two-fold. One that the drumbeat for layered security should continue to be heeded. And two, that careful vetting is necessary for even the most commoditized of products and categories. 

Ericka Chickowski specializes in coverage of information technology and business innovation. She has focused on information security for the better part of a decade and regularly writes about the security industry as a contributor to Dark Reading.  View Full Bio
 

Recommended Reading:

Comment  | 
Print  | 
More Insights
Comments
Newest First  |  Oldest First  |  Threaded View
NSA Appoints Rob Joyce as Cyber Director
Dark Reading Staff 1/15/2021
Register for Dark Reading Newsletters
White Papers
Video
Cartoon Contest
Current Issue
2020: The Year in Security
Download this Tech Digest for a look at the biggest security stories that - so far - have shaped a very strange and stressful year.
Flash Poll
Assessing Cybersecurity Risk in Today's Enterprises
Assessing Cybersecurity Risk in Today's Enterprises
COVID-19 has created a new IT paradigm in the enterprise -- and a new level of cybersecurity risk. This report offers a look at how enterprises are assessing and managing cyber-risk under the new normal.
Twitter Feed
Dark Reading - Bug Report
Bug Report
Enterprise Vulnerabilities
From DHS/US-CERT's National Vulnerability Database
CVE-2020-8567
PUBLISHED: 2021-01-21
Kubernetes Secrets Store CSI Driver Vault Plugin prior to v0.0.6, Azure Plugin prior to v0.0.10, and GCP Plugin prior to v0.2.0 allow an attacker who can create specially-crafted SecretProviderClass objects to write to arbitrary file paths on the host filesystem, including /var/lib/kubelet/pods.
CVE-2020-8568
PUBLISHED: 2021-01-21
Kubernetes Secrets Store CSI Driver versions v0.0.15 and v0.0.16 allow an attacker who can modify a SecretProviderClassPodStatus/Status resource the ability to write content to the host filesystem and sync file contents to Kubernetes Secrets. This includes paths under var/lib/kubelet/pods that conta...
CVE-2020-8569
PUBLISHED: 2021-01-21
Kubernetes CSI snapshot-controller prior to v2.1.3 and v3.0.2 could panic when processing a VolumeSnapshot custom resource when: - The VolumeSnapshot referenced a non-existing PersistentVolumeClaim and the VolumeSnapshot did not reference any VolumeSnapshotClass. - The snapshot-controller crashes, ...
CVE-2020-8570
PUBLISHED: 2021-01-21
Kubernetes Java client libraries in version 10.0.0 and versions prior to 9.0.1 allow writes to paths outside of the current directory when copying multiple files from a remote pod which sends a maliciously crafted archive. This can potentially overwrite any files on the system of the process executi...
CVE-2020-8554
PUBLISHED: 2021-01-21
Kubernetes API server in all versions allow an attacker who is able to create a ClusterIP service and set the spec.externalIPs field, to intercept traffic to that IP address. Additionally, an attacker who is able to patch the status (which is considered a privileged operation and should not typicall...