Dark Reading is part of the Informa Tech Division of Informa PLC

This site is operated by a business or businesses owned by Informa PLC and all copyright resides with them.Informa PLC's registered office is 5 Howick Place, London SW1P 1WG. Registered in England and Wales. Number 8860726.

Perimeter

7/1/2019
01:15 PM
50%
50%

Ransomware Hits Georgia Court System

The court's IT department is meeting with external agencies to determine the scope and severity of the cyberattack.

News reports have confirmed the Georgia court system has been struck with a ransomware attack, which has resulted in at least part of its digital information systems being taken offline.

An investigation is now underway; it remains unclear how many systems were compromised. Bruce Shaw, spokesman for the Administrative Office of the Courts, confirmed the attack and reports not all court systems have been affected. As a precaution, the network was taken offline and the IT department is working with external parties to determine the attack's extent.

This isn't Georgia's first foray into ransomware investigations. Back in March 2018, computer systems of the City of Atlanta were hit with a ransomware campaign that significantly disrupted government operations and caused millions of dollars in losses. In that case, Atlanta refused to pay the $50,000 ransom and is paying millions more to recover from the incident.

Read more details here.

 

Black Hat USA returns to Las Vegas with hands-on technical Trainings, cutting-edge Briefings, Arsenal open-source tool demonstrations, top-tier security solutions, and service providers in the Business Hall. Click for information on the conference and to register.

Dark Reading's Quick Hits delivers a brief synopsis and summary of the significance of breaking news events. For more information from the original source of the news item, please follow the link provided in this article. View Full Bio

Comment  | 
Print  | 
More Insights
Comments
Oldest First  |  Newest First  |  Threaded View
tdsan
50%
50%
tdsan,
User Rank: Ninja
7/6/2019 | 2:26:15 PM
Georgia security recommendations
Per the article, it was stated that GA is spending millions of dollars in resolving this issue with Ransomware. So how is it that the GA court got hit again (no lessons learned from March) and they had to still fork over money to address a similar issue? Is it me or has the security staff become extremely lax or individuals from the office have forgotten aspects of their training?

Timeline:


In March, ransomware hit the court system in rural Jackson County Georgia, between Atlanta and Athens. Jackson County paid attackers $400,000. And throughout June, three Florida municipalities—Key Biscayne, Lake City, and Riviera Beach—were hit with ransomware. Lake City paid 42 bitcoin (almost $500,000) to attackers, and Riviera Beach paid 65 bitcoin (almost $600,000).


Ok, so it seems the solutions we are putting place are not working, there needs to be a radical change in how we address this issue. If the person is click on the link, shouldn't there be adequate precautions, examples as follows:
  • Segment the network where web-traffic goes to a DMZ (proxied and filtered), two diferent types of FW, utilize the firewall on the servers "iptables -I INPUT 1 -p tcp -m multiport --dport 22,80,443 -m conntrack --ctstate NEW -j ACCEPT" and drop packets from china or Russia using iptables (shell script can help with this process)
    for i in `cat china.txt`; do iptables -A INPUT -s $i -j DROP; done
    python -c "import os; file = open('chinaip.txt', 'r'); for i in file: os.system('iptables -A INPUT -s i -j DROP'); print(f'Entry succeeded: ' $?)
  • If web traffic comes through, put it on IPv6 traffic, put the network on a different type of protocol all together (internally)
  • If the data is stored on a segmented network, remove SMB/CIFS from the "Zone 0" data. The filesystem should not have a way of encrpting the data at all, the module for encrption should be removed (put this on Linux or Z/OS), even if there is a payload, the AV should catch this because the application or user is not an approved user from an SELinux standpoint.
  • Employ SELinux (MIT's file, process, filesystem, domain application used for controlling the type of execution, if it comes from the web, then the data that comes in in a folder should be setup using "setsebool -P use_encryptfs_home_dirs off" and "semanage fcontext -a -t use_encryptfs_home_dirs "/home/<username>(/.*)?" and finally run ls -lZ /home/<username> to disable encryption on the home dirs.

Todd
US Turning Up the Heat on North Korea's Cyber Threat Operations
Jai Vijayan, Contributing Writer,  9/16/2019
Preventing PTSD and Burnout for Cybersecurity Professionals
Craig Hinkley, CEO, WhiteHat Security,  9/16/2019
NetCAT Vulnerability Is Out of the Bag
Dark Reading Staff 9/12/2019
Register for Dark Reading Newsletters
White Papers
Video
Cartoon Contest
Current Issue
7 Threats & Disruptive Forces Changing the Face of Cybersecurity
This Dark Reading Tech Digest gives an in-depth look at the biggest emerging threats and disruptive forces that are changing the face of cybersecurity today.
Flash Poll
The State of IT Operations and Cybersecurity Operations
The State of IT Operations and Cybersecurity Operations
Your enterprise's cyber risk may depend upon the relationship between the IT team and the security team. Heres some insight on what's working and what isn't in the data center.
Twitter Feed
Dark Reading - Bug Report
Bug Report
Enterprise Vulnerabilities
From DHS/US-CERT's National Vulnerability Database
CVE-2019-3738
PUBLISHED: 2019-09-18
RSA BSAFE Crypto-J versions prior to 6.2.5 are vulnerable to an Improper Verification of Cryptographic Signature vulnerability. A malicious remote attacker could potentially exploit this vulnerability to coerce two parties into computing the same predictable shared key.
CVE-2019-3739
PUBLISHED: 2019-09-18
RSA BSAFE Crypto-J versions prior to 6.2.5 are vulnerable to Information Exposure Through Timing Discrepancy vulnerabilities during ECDSA key generation. A malicious remote attacker could potentially exploit those vulnerabilities to recover ECDSA keys.
CVE-2019-3740
PUBLISHED: 2019-09-18
RSA BSAFE Crypto-J versions prior to 6.2.5 are vulnerable to an Information Exposure Through Timing Discrepancy vulnerabilities during DSA key generation. A malicious remote attacker could potentially exploit those vulnerabilities to recover DSA keys.
CVE-2019-3756
PUBLISHED: 2019-09-18
RSA Archer, versions prior to 6.6 P3 (6.6.0.3), contain an information disclosure vulnerability. Information relating to the backend database gets disclosed to low-privileged RSA Archer users' UI under certain error conditions.
CVE-2019-3758
PUBLISHED: 2019-09-18
RSA Archer, versions prior to 6.6 P2 (6.6.0.2), contain an improper authentication vulnerability. The vulnerability allows sysadmins to create user accounts with insufficient credentials. Unauthenticated attackers could gain unauthorized access to the system using those accounts.