Dark Reading is part of the Informa Tech Division of Informa PLC

This site is operated by a business or businesses owned by Informa PLC and all copyright resides with them.Informa PLC's registered office is 5 Howick Place, London SW1P 1WG. Registered in England and Wales. Number 8860726.


10:30 AM
Connect Directly
E-Mail vvv

Incident Response: 3 Easy Traps & How to Avoid Them

Sage legal advice about navigating a data breach from a troubleshooting cybersecurity outside counsel.

While a serious security incident may be a rare occurrence inside an organization, as a troubleshooting outside counsel, I witness a range of incidents that run the gamut from serious to strange and are often riddled with common pitfalls. It never fails that the event seems to occur at the most inopportune times, such as Christmas Eve or when I'm standing in the middle of the frozen food section of the grocery store (both real-life examples) — the phone rings, and on the other line a client is experiencing their worst day ever. My job is to jump into the mix and begin troubleshooting the legal risks. Here are three traps I frequently see security teams fall into, and how best to navigate them.

Trap 1: Failure to Have a True Incident Response Plan (or to Follow It)
When was the last time you dusted off the ancient incident response plan and actually read it? No matter how sophisticated your organization may be, or how many times you've conducted a tabletop exercise in the last few years, it is important to review the plan and refresh it based on what incidents your organization may face today.

Do you know who is going to call outside counsel? Do you know who is alerting the insurance company? Or, better question, do you know what event triggers the alerting of both? These are often steps that need to happen either immediately or rapidly after first learning of an event.

Often, in the heat of a serious incident, the plan gets pushed to the wayside. Control of the incident response gets wrestled away from the CISO and may get placed in the hands of the CFO or the CEO. This is inevitable if the event is serious enough — not a single medical record compromised but the entire patient portal, for instance. You need to plan for those events that are catastrophic and work backward from there.

Is there a key member of the team that you know is going to be a part of the incident response, even if his or her job title doesn't lend itself to being in the room? For example, is Alex a trusted member of the C-suite as chief strategy officer? If so, Alex may need to be considered as part of the team when the worst hits. What is Alex's role? Practical planning in advance can save you a headache later.

Trap 2: Alerting the Wrong Law Enforcement Agency
This is another semiridiculous outcome. When the phone rings, a breathless client on the other end shares that law enforcement has already been alerted. Inevitably, it's the wrong law enforcement agency for the event. While local police are great practical friends of many companies, they are rarely the group that should be called during a cybersecurity incident. Even state police in most states do not have the resources to adequately respond to a data breach.

In some cases, the question of whom to call will depend on the actual nature of the event and on the severity of the issue. In all cases, the decision about whether to call, when to call, and whom to call needs to be a conversation you first have with an attorney. While you may think that calling the FBI Cyber Crimes Division is the always the right move, there are exceptions, especially if you are dealing with an incident involving W2s or Employer Identification Numbers (EIN) theft, which may require a call to an IRS Special Agent. If there is physical mail involved, the U.S. Postal Service Fraud Division may be able to assign an agent to the investigation. There are strategic reasons for those calls and sometimes the reason can be simply finding an investigative authority who has the time to look into your particular issue.

Calling law enforcement before you have your attorney's blessing can only make things more difficult. If you call the local police and they send over Deputy Andy with his cop car, employees will begin asking questions before the communications plan is ready to roll out.

Many if not most cybercrimes unfortunately do not result in handcuffs. And so some of you in the cybersecurity industry may ask whether it's worth calling law enforcement at all. From the perspective of outside counsel, it is always better to be able to say we are "working with law enforcement" on a particular event, especially if it is catastrophic. But getting to the "working with law enforcement" part can be tricky. Sometimes, just because of the sheer number of incidents outside counsel have experienced, they may be able to get through to the right investigative authority quicker than you can alone. Trust that outside counsel will know who to call and let the call be placed.

Trap 3: Being Careless about Communications
Your cybersecurity event is never a "breach" until the thoughtful decision is made to categorize it as a "breach." Until such time, it is an "incident" or an "event."

Similarly, the way you characterize and describe the incident can have ramifications in potential lawsuits later on. When alerting employees, remember to use phrases like "our company has been the victim of a cybercrime." Also, if Marla at the front desk clicked on a phishing email and exposed the crown jewels, now is not the time to say in group emails without counsel copied that you've been lobbying for her to be fired for failing to pass company phishing tests for years. As always, keep in mind that the highest cloak of confidentiality you can throw over communications is to loop in your attorney and use attorney-client privilege. Without that, every communication you send may be an exhibit in a later lawsuit.

Related Content:

Beth Burgin Waller is a lawyer who knows how to navigate between the server room and the board room. As chair of the cybersecurity & data privacy practice at Woods Rogers, she advises clients on cybersecurity and on data privacy concerns. In this capacity, she ... View Full Bio
Comment  | 
Print  | 
More Insights
Newest First  |  Oldest First  |  Threaded View
User Rank: Ninja
5/24/2019 | 2:32:45 PM
Re: InfoSec Law for Dummies (or Engineers)
The Landscape itself was changed with first WannaCry in 2017 and then the Experian catastrophe - the effective Chernobyl of data breach stories.  After these two incidents, data breach and ransomware assumed a whole new face and import.  And corporate reaction took a beating after what Experian and brain-dead CEO stated in testimony.  We are MUCH more aware as a result of the downside beating a firm can take in private and public. 
User Rank: Ninja
5/23/2019 | 12:36:32 PM
InfoSec Law for Dummies (or Engineers)
This article is a reminder that many engineers are woefully clueless when it comes to cyberlaw and some are clearly the wrong person to have in a room with lawyers after an "event".  It also calls to my attention that it seems the rift between the lawyers and security engineers is often vast.  At a minimum companies should keep documentation and provide training along the lines of "InfoSec Law for Dummies (or Engineers)" so everyone is speaking the same language.  Additionally, there should be regular face-to-face moments between an organization's cyberlaw team and the techs who do the work.  In the FLOSS realm, lawyers are often programmers themselves, and the language of law and tech among FLOSS coders is pretty fluid.  We're versed on the law through necessity.  However, in the corporate world, this seems far from common and the divide can be so vast as to be an "event" in and of itself.
Navigating Security in the Cloud
Diya Jolly, Chief Product Officer, Okta,  12/4/2019
SOC 2s & Third-Party Assessments: How to Prevent Them from Being Used in a Data Breach Lawsuit
Beth Burgin Waller, Chair, Cybersecurity & Data Privacy Practice , Woods Rogers PLC,  12/5/2019
Register for Dark Reading Newsletters
White Papers
Cartoon Contest
Current Issue
Navigating the Deluge of Security Data
In this Tech Digest, Dark Reading shares the experiences of some top security practitioners as they navigate volumes of security data. We examine some examples of how enterprises can cull this data to find the clues they need.
Flash Poll
Rethinking Enterprise Data Defense
Rethinking Enterprise Data Defense
Frustrated with recurring intrusions and breaches, cybersecurity professionals are questioning some of the industrys conventional wisdom. Heres a look at what theyre thinking about.
Twitter Feed
Dark Reading - Bug Report
Bug Report
Enterprise Vulnerabilities
From DHS/US-CERT's National Vulnerability Database
PUBLISHED: 2019-12-09
alter.c in SQLite through 3.30.1 allows attackers to trigger infinite recursion via certain types of self-referential views in conjunction with ALTER TABLE statements.
PUBLISHED: 2019-12-09
In "Xray Test Management for Jira" prior to version 3.5.5, remote authenticated attackers can cause XSS in the generic field entry point via the Generic Test Definition field of a new Generic Test issue.
PUBLISHED: 2019-12-09
In "Xray Test Management for Jira" prior to version 3.5.5, remote authenticated attackers can cause XSS in the Pre-Condition Summary entry point via the summary field of a Create Pre-Condition action for a new Test Issue.
PUBLISHED: 2019-12-09
radare2 through 4.0.0 lacks validation of the content variable in the function r_asm_pseudo_incbin at libr/asm/asm.c, ultimately leading to an arbitrary write. This allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (application crash) or possibly have unspecified other impact via crafted input.
PUBLISHED: 2019-12-09
In the macho_parse_file functionality in macho/macho.c of YARA 3.11.0, command_size may be inconsistent with the real size. A specially crafted MachO file can cause an out-of-bounds memory access, resulting in Denial of Service (application crash) or potential code execution.