Dark Reading is part of the Informa Tech Division of Informa PLC

This site is operated by a business or businesses owned by Informa PLC and all copyright resides with them.Informa PLC's registered office is 5 Howick Place, London SW1P 1WG. Registered in England and Wales. Number 8860726.

Perimeter

5/29/2019
03:45 PM
Connect Directly
Twitter
LinkedIn
Google+
RSS
E-Mail
50%
50%

Impersonation Attacks Up 67% for Corporate Inboxes

Nearly three-quarters of organizations hit with impersonation attacks experienced direct losses of money, customers, and data.

Email-based cyberattacks are going up, causing confidence in security defenses to fall as businesses grapple with greater losses caused by email-borne cyberattacks, researchers report.

Sixty-one percent of 1,025 IT decision makers polled in Mimecast's "State of Email Security" report, conducted by Vanson Bourne, say it's likely or inevitable their businesses will suffer the negative effects of emailed cyberattacks this year. Their concerns aren't unfounded: Impersonation, phishing, and insider threats have all become more common in the past year.

The majority (94%) of organizations say they were hit with a phishing attack in 2018, researchers found, and 54% noticed an increase in the volume of phishing attacks. Nearly half (45%) reported a rise in targeted spear-phishing emails packing malicious links, and 53% suffered a ransomware attack that directly affected business operations – up 26% from a year ago. Of the ransomware victims, 86% say they experienced at least two days of downtime; three days was the average.

Impersonation and business email compromise (BEC) attacks were up among 67% of respondents, and 73% of those hit with such attacks say they experienced direct resulting losses. Members of the C-suite, human resources, and finance teams are likely to be impersonated, according to the report.

"You'd think they'd be imitating financial officers, but they don't necessarily have to," says Joshua Douglas, vice president of threat intelligence at Mimecast. These are all high-ranking employees with intrinsic trust throughout the organization, he explains, and they have access to data –specifically financial data – that attackers want. They can imitate someone in HR to get bank accounts changed on payroll, or they can pose as a CEO to request gift cards. If an intruder has the authority of a trusted figure, he can shift the dynamic in social engineering schemes.

How much damage can an impersonation attack cause? Quite a bit, researchers found. Once an adversary gets a foot in the door, he can obtain credentials and transition to lateral movement. By mimicking a legitimate employee, the attacker gets more trust from other people throughout the organization, Douglas says. This makes the attacker even harder to detect.

Nearly 40% of respondents say they experienced data loss as a result of email-based impersonation attacks, 29% reported direct financial loss, 28% lost customers, and 27% admitted some employees lost their jobs. Still, 38% of those who suffered losses say their data was most valuable to lose.

"If you look at the loss of data, that's the hardest for any company to recover from," Douglas says. "Once that data's out, it's out." If a rival business gains access to a victim's intellectual property, they can mimic a product. Loss of user data causes trust issues and customer loss.

Insider threats are another growing trend, he continues, but most employees don't know when they're doing something wrong. "Most insider threat activities are accidental," Douglas explains. "There's a small portion that are, in fact, malicious," and those are tough to identify.

Security mishaps are common but can be prevented with awareness training if conducted properly. Most awareness training (62%) happens in a group session; other popular methods include interactive videos highlighting best and worst practices (45%), formal online testing (44%), reference lists of tips (44%), and one-on-one training sessions (44%), researchers report. In large training groups, interest quickly wanes and employees fail to pay attention to content.

Douglas recommends "microtraining," or short intervals during which employees are engaged. Rather than doing a long cybersecurity training course a few times a year, businesses should instead adopt a system that regularly reminds employees of best cybersecurity practices.

Related Content:

Kelly Sheridan is the Staff Editor at Dark Reading, where she focuses on cybersecurity news and analysis. She is a business technology journalist who previously reported for InformationWeek, where she covered Microsoft, and Insurance & Technology, where she covered financial ... View Full Bio

Comment  | 
Print  | 
More Insights
Comments
Oldest First  |  Newest First  |  Threaded View
REISEN1955
50%
50%
REISEN1955,
User Rank: Ninja
5/30/2019 | 8:03:53 AM
Lower level than C-Suite has better chance
The advertised posts from the Chairman and CEO to a low staffer indicative of " Can I have 5 min of your time" always struck me as a joke.  So obvious - now some dummies may respond.  But generally a CEO is fine in his own sphere.  Users are far more likely to respond to normal communication from HR.  More believable so that would be the better entry point - phone number update for database, etc - records, that kind of thing.   This is similiar to regular mail received from a high govenment official vs. local town planning board about a zone issue or the like.  
Why Cyber-Risk Is a C-Suite Issue
Marc Wilczek, Digital Strategist & CIO Advisor,  11/12/2019
DevSecOps: The Answer to the Cloud Security Skills Gap
Lamont Orange, Chief Information Security Officer at Netskope,  11/15/2019
Attackers' Costs Increasing as Businesses Focus on Security
Robert Lemos, Contributing Writer,  11/15/2019
Register for Dark Reading Newsletters
White Papers
Video
Cartoon Contest
Current Issue
Navigating the Deluge of Security Data
In this Tech Digest, Dark Reading shares the experiences of some top security practitioners as they navigate volumes of security data. We examine some examples of how enterprises can cull this data to find the clues they need.
Flash Poll
Rethinking Enterprise Data Defense
Rethinking Enterprise Data Defense
Frustrated with recurring intrusions and breaches, cybersecurity professionals are questioning some of the industrys conventional wisdom. Heres a look at what theyre thinking about.
Twitter Feed
Dark Reading - Bug Report
Bug Report
Enterprise Vulnerabilities
From DHS/US-CERT's National Vulnerability Database
CVE-2019-19040
PUBLISHED: 2019-11-17
KairosDB through 1.2.2 has XSS in view.html because of showErrorMessage in js/graph.js, as demonstrated by view.html?q= with a '"sampling":{"value":"<script>' substring.
CVE-2019-19041
PUBLISHED: 2019-11-17
An issue was discovered in Xorux Lpar2RRD 6.11 and Stor2RRD 2.61, as distributed in Xorux 2.41. They do not correctly verify the integrity of an upgrade package before processing it. As a result, official upgrade packages can be modified to inject an arbitrary Bash script that will be executed by th...
CVE-2019-19012
PUBLISHED: 2019-11-17
An integer overflow in the search_in_range function in regexec.c in Oniguruma 6.x before 6.9.4_rc2 leads to an out-of-bounds read, in which the offset of this read is under the control of an attacker. (This only affects the 32-bit compiled version). Remote attackers can cause a denial-of-service or ...
CVE-2019-19022
PUBLISHED: 2019-11-17
iTerm2 through 3.3.6 has potentially insufficient documentation about the presence of search history in com.googlecode.iterm2.plist, which might allow remote attackers to obtain sensitive information, as demonstrated by searching for the NoSyncSearchHistory string in .plist files within public Git r...
CVE-2019-19035
PUBLISHED: 2019-11-17
jhead 3.03 is affected by: heap-based buffer over-read. The impact is: Denial of service. The component is: ReadJpegSections and process_SOFn in jpgfile.c. The attack vector is: Open a specially crafted JPEG file.