Dark Reading is part of the Informa Tech Division of Informa PLC

This site is operated by a business or businesses owned by Informa PLC and all copyright resides with them.Informa PLC's registered office is 5 Howick Place, London SW1P 1WG. Registered in England and Wales. Number 8860726.

Perimeter

5/29/2019
03:45 PM
Connect Directly
Twitter
LinkedIn
Google+
RSS
E-Mail
50%
50%

Impersonation Attacks Up 67% for Corporate Inboxes

Nearly three-quarters of organizations hit with impersonation attacks experienced direct losses of money, customers, and data.

Email-based cyberattacks are going up, causing confidence in security defenses to fall as businesses grapple with greater losses caused by email-borne cyberattacks, researchers report.

Sixty-one percent of 1,025 IT decision makers polled in Mimecast's "State of Email Security" report, conducted by Vanson Bourne, say it's likely or inevitable their businesses will suffer the negative effects of emailed cyberattacks this year. Their concerns aren't unfounded: Impersonation, phishing, and insider threats have all become more common in the past year.

The majority (94%) of organizations say they were hit with a phishing attack in 2018, researchers found, and 54% noticed an increase in the volume of phishing attacks. Nearly half (45%) reported a rise in targeted spear-phishing emails packing malicious links, and 53% suffered a ransomware attack that directly affected business operations – up 26% from a year ago. Of the ransomware victims, 86% say they experienced at least two days of downtime; three days was the average.

Impersonation and business email compromise (BEC) attacks were up among 67% of respondents, and 73% of those hit with such attacks say they experienced direct resulting losses. Members of the C-suite, human resources, and finance teams are likely to be impersonated, according to the report.

"You'd think they'd be imitating financial officers, but they don't necessarily have to," says Joshua Douglas, vice president of threat intelligence at Mimecast. These are all high-ranking employees with intrinsic trust throughout the organization, he explains, and they have access to data –specifically financial data – that attackers want. They can imitate someone in HR to get bank accounts changed on payroll, or they can pose as a CEO to request gift cards. If an intruder has the authority of a trusted figure, he can shift the dynamic in social engineering schemes.

How much damage can an impersonation attack cause? Quite a bit, researchers found. Once an adversary gets a foot in the door, he can obtain credentials and transition to lateral movement. By mimicking a legitimate employee, the attacker gets more trust from other people throughout the organization, Douglas says. This makes the attacker even harder to detect.

Nearly 40% of respondents say they experienced data loss as a result of email-based impersonation attacks, 29% reported direct financial loss, 28% lost customers, and 27% admitted some employees lost their jobs. Still, 38% of those who suffered losses say their data was most valuable to lose.

"If you look at the loss of data, that's the hardest for any company to recover from," Douglas says. "Once that data's out, it's out." If a rival business gains access to a victim's intellectual property, they can mimic a product. Loss of user data causes trust issues and customer loss.

Insider threats are another growing trend, he continues, but most employees don't know when they're doing something wrong. "Most insider threat activities are accidental," Douglas explains. "There's a small portion that are, in fact, malicious," and those are tough to identify.

Security mishaps are common but can be prevented with awareness training if conducted properly. Most awareness training (62%) happens in a group session; other popular methods include interactive videos highlighting best and worst practices (45%), formal online testing (44%), reference lists of tips (44%), and one-on-one training sessions (44%), researchers report. In large training groups, interest quickly wanes and employees fail to pay attention to content.

Douglas recommends "microtraining," or short intervals during which employees are engaged. Rather than doing a long cybersecurity training course a few times a year, businesses should instead adopt a system that regularly reminds employees of best cybersecurity practices.

Related Content:

Kelly Sheridan is the Staff Editor at Dark Reading, where she focuses on cybersecurity news and analysis. She is a business technology journalist who previously reported for InformationWeek, where she covered Microsoft, and Insurance & Technology, where she covered financial ... View Full Bio

Comment  | 
Print  | 
More Insights
Comments
Newest First  |  Oldest First  |  Threaded View
REISEN1955
50%
50%
REISEN1955,
User Rank: Ninja
5/30/2019 | 8:03:53 AM
Lower level than C-Suite has better chance
The advertised posts from the Chairman and CEO to a low staffer indicative of " Can I have 5 min of your time" always struck me as a joke.  So obvious - now some dummies may respond.  But generally a CEO is fine in his own sphere.  Users are far more likely to respond to normal communication from HR.  More believable so that would be the better entry point - phone number update for database, etc - records, that kind of thing.   This is similiar to regular mail received from a high govenment official vs. local town planning board about a zone issue or the like.  
7 Tips for Infosec Pros Considering A Lateral Career Move
Kelly Sheridan, Staff Editor, Dark Reading,  1/21/2020
For Mismanaged SOCs, The Price Is Not Right
Kelly Sheridan, Staff Editor, Dark Reading,  1/22/2020
Register for Dark Reading Newsletters
White Papers
Video
Cartoon Contest
Current Issue
IT 2020: A Look Ahead
Are you ready for the critical changes that will occur in 2020? We've compiled editor insights from the best of our network (Dark Reading, Data Center Knowledge, InformationWeek, ITPro Today and Network Computing) to deliver to you a look at the trends, technologies, and threats that are emerging in the coming year. Download it today!
Flash Poll
How Enterprises are Attacking the Cybersecurity Problem
How Enterprises are Attacking the Cybersecurity Problem
Organizations have invested in a sweeping array of security technologies to address challenges associated with the growing number of cybersecurity attacks. However, the complexity involved in managing these technologies is emerging as a major problem. Read this report to find out what your peers biggest security challenges are and the technologies they are using to address them.
Twitter Feed
Dark Reading - Bug Report
Bug Report
Enterprise Vulnerabilities
From DHS/US-CERT's National Vulnerability Database
CVE-2015-3154
PUBLISHED: 2020-01-27
CRLF injection vulnerability in Zend\Mail (Zend_Mail) in Zend Framework before 1.12.12, 2.x before 2.3.8, and 2.4.x before 2.4.1 allows remote attackers to inject arbitrary HTTP headers and conduct HTTP response splitting attacks via CRLF sequences in the header of an email.
CVE-2019-17190
PUBLISHED: 2020-01-27
A Local Privilege Escalation issue was discovered in Avast Secure Browser 76.0.1659.101. The vulnerability is due to an insecure ACL set by the AvastBrowserUpdate.exe (which is running as NT AUTHORITY\SYSTEM) when AvastSecureBrowser.exe checks for new updates. When the update check is triggered, the...
CVE-2014-8161
PUBLISHED: 2020-01-27
PostgreSQL before 9.0.19, 9.1.x before 9.1.15, 9.2.x before 9.2.10, 9.3.x before 9.3.6, and 9.4.x before 9.4.1 allows remote authenticated users to obtain sensitive column values by triggering constraint violation and then reading the error message.
CVE-2014-9481
PUBLISHED: 2020-01-27
The Scribunto extension for MediaWiki allows remote attackers to obtain the rollback token and possibly other sensitive information via a crafted module, related to unstripping special page HTML.
CVE-2015-0241
PUBLISHED: 2020-01-27
The to_char function in PostgreSQL before 9.0.19, 9.1.x before 9.1.15, 9.2.x before 9.2.10, 9.3.x before 9.3.6, and 9.4.x before 9.4.1 allows remote authenticated users to cause a denial of service (crash) or possibly execute arbitrary code via a (1) large number of digits when processing a numeric ...