Dark Reading is part of the Informa Tech Division of Informa PLC

This site is operated by a business or businesses owned by Informa PLC and all copyright resides with them.Informa PLC's registered office is 5 Howick Place, London SW1P 1WG. Registered in England and Wales. Number 8860726.

Perimeter

5/29/2019
03:45 PM
Connect Directly
Twitter
LinkedIn
Google+
RSS
E-Mail
50%
50%

Impersonation Attacks Up 67% for Corporate Inboxes

Nearly three-quarters of organizations hit with impersonation attacks experienced direct losses of money, customers, and data.

Email-based cyberattacks are going up, causing confidence in security defenses to fall as businesses grapple with greater losses caused by email-borne cyberattacks, researchers report.

Sixty-one percent of 1,025 IT decision makers polled in Mimecast's "State of Email Security" report, conducted by Vanson Bourne, say it's likely or inevitable their businesses will suffer the negative effects of emailed cyberattacks this year. Their concerns aren't unfounded: Impersonation, phishing, and insider threats have all become more common in the past year.

The majority (94%) of organizations say they were hit with a phishing attack in 2018, researchers found, and 54% noticed an increase in the volume of phishing attacks. Nearly half (45%) reported a rise in targeted spear-phishing emails packing malicious links, and 53% suffered a ransomware attack that directly affected business operations – up 26% from a year ago. Of the ransomware victims, 86% say they experienced at least two days of downtime; three days was the average.

Impersonation and business email compromise (BEC) attacks were up among 67% of respondents, and 73% of those hit with such attacks say they experienced direct resulting losses. Members of the C-suite, human resources, and finance teams are likely to be impersonated, according to the report.

"You'd think they'd be imitating financial officers, but they don't necessarily have to," says Joshua Douglas, vice president of threat intelligence at Mimecast. These are all high-ranking employees with intrinsic trust throughout the organization, he explains, and they have access to data –specifically financial data – that attackers want. They can imitate someone in HR to get bank accounts changed on payroll, or they can pose as a CEO to request gift cards. If an intruder has the authority of a trusted figure, he can shift the dynamic in social engineering schemes.

How much damage can an impersonation attack cause? Quite a bit, researchers found. Once an adversary gets a foot in the door, he can obtain credentials and transition to lateral movement. By mimicking a legitimate employee, the attacker gets more trust from other people throughout the organization, Douglas says. This makes the attacker even harder to detect.

Nearly 40% of respondents say they experienced data loss as a result of email-based impersonation attacks, 29% reported direct financial loss, 28% lost customers, and 27% admitted some employees lost their jobs. Still, 38% of those who suffered losses say their data was most valuable to lose.

"If you look at the loss of data, that's the hardest for any company to recover from," Douglas says. "Once that data's out, it's out." If a rival business gains access to a victim's intellectual property, they can mimic a product. Loss of user data causes trust issues and customer loss.

Insider threats are another growing trend, he continues, but most employees don't know when they're doing something wrong. "Most insider threat activities are accidental," Douglas explains. "There's a small portion that are, in fact, malicious," and those are tough to identify.

Security mishaps are common but can be prevented with awareness training if conducted properly. Most awareness training (62%) happens in a group session; other popular methods include interactive videos highlighting best and worst practices (45%), formal online testing (44%), reference lists of tips (44%), and one-on-one training sessions (44%), researchers report. In large training groups, interest quickly wanes and employees fail to pay attention to content.

Douglas recommends "microtraining," or short intervals during which employees are engaged. Rather than doing a long cybersecurity training course a few times a year, businesses should instead adopt a system that regularly reminds employees of best cybersecurity practices.

Related Content:

Kelly Sheridan is the Staff Editor at Dark Reading, where she focuses on cybersecurity news and analysis. She is a business technology journalist who previously reported for InformationWeek, where she covered Microsoft, and Insurance & Technology, where she covered financial ... View Full Bio

Comment  | 
Print  | 
More Insights
Comments
Newest First  |  Oldest First  |  Threaded View
REISEN1955
50%
50%
REISEN1955,
User Rank: Ninja
5/30/2019 | 8:03:53 AM
Lower level than C-Suite has better chance
The advertised posts from the Chairman and CEO to a low staffer indicative of " Can I have 5 min of your time" always struck me as a joke.  So obvious - now some dummies may respond.  But generally a CEO is fine in his own sphere.  Users are far more likely to respond to normal communication from HR.  More believable so that would be the better entry point - phone number update for database, etc - records, that kind of thing.   This is similiar to regular mail received from a high govenment official vs. local town planning board about a zone issue or the like.  
Firms Improve Threat Detection but Face Increasingly Disruptive Attacks
Robert Lemos, Contributing Writer,  2/20/2020
Ransomware Damage Hit $11.5B in 2019
Dark Reading Staff 2/20/2020
Register for Dark Reading Newsletters
White Papers
Video
Cartoon
Current Issue
6 Emerging Cyber Threats That Enterprises Face in 2020
This Tech Digest gives an in-depth look at six emerging cyber threats that enterprises could face in 2020. Download your copy today!
Flash Poll
How Enterprises Are Developing and Maintaining Secure Applications
How Enterprises Are Developing and Maintaining Secure Applications
The concept of application security is well known, but application security testing and remediation processes remain unbalanced. Most organizations are confident in their approach to AppSec, although others seem to have no approach at all. Read this report to find out more.
Twitter Feed
Dark Reading - Bug Report
Bug Report
Enterprise Vulnerabilities
From DHS/US-CERT's National Vulnerability Database
CVE-2018-19668
PUBLISHED: 2020-02-27
** REJECT ** DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: CVE-2018-17963. Reason: This candidate is a reservation duplicate of CVE-2018-17963. Notes: All CVE users should reference CVE-2018-17963 instead of this candidate. All references and descriptions in this candidate have been removed to preve...
CVE-2019-12882
PUBLISHED: 2020-02-27
** REJECT ** DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: This candidate was withdrawn by its CNA. Further investigation showed that it was not a security issue. Notes: none.
CVE-2017-6363
PUBLISHED: 2020-02-27
** DISPUTED ** In the GD Graphics Library (aka LibGD) through 2.2.5, there is a heap-based buffer over-read in tiffWriter in gd_tiff.c. NOTE: the vendor says "In my opinion this issue should not have a CVE, since the GD and GD2 formats are documented to be 'obsolete, and should only be used for...
CVE-2017-6371
PUBLISHED: 2020-02-27
Synchronet BBS 3.16c for Windows allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (service crash) via a long string in the HTTP Referer header.
CVE-2017-5861
PUBLISHED: 2020-02-27
** REJECT ** DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: CVE-2017-1000020. Reason: This candidate is a reservation duplicate of CVE-2017-1000020. Notes: All CVE users should reference CVE-2017-1000020 instead of this candidate. All references and descriptions in this candidate have been removed to...