Dark Reading is part of the Informa Tech Division of Informa PLC

This site is operated by a business or businesses owned by Informa PLC and all copyright resides with them.Informa PLC's registered office is 5 Howick Place, London SW1P 1WG. Registered in England and Wales. Number 8860726.

Perimeter

12/18/2014
09:50 PM
Connect Directly
Twitter
LinkedIn
RSS
E-Mail
100%
0%

ICANN Hit By Cyberattack

Spear phishing campaign led to attackers gaining administrative access to one system.

The Internet Corporation for Assigned Names and Numbers (ICANN), the organization responsible for managing the Internet’s use of domain names, was recently compromised by a spear phishing campaign.

In an alert earlier this week, ICANN said it is investigating an intrusion into its networks that appears related to a spear phishing campaign in late November. Several members of ICANN’s staff received email messages that purported to have been sent from within ICANN's own domain. The email credentials of several ICANN staff members were compromised in the attack.

Those credentials were later used to gain administrative access to ICANN's Centralized Zone Data System (CZDS), ICANN said in its alert.

ICANN describes CZDS as a system that contains files containing data describing a portion of the domain space for Top Level Domains (TLDs). “Zone files contain the information needed to resolve domain names to Internet Protocol (IP) numbers,” according to ICANN. Files in the CZDS include domain names, their associated name server names, and the IP addresses for those name servers.

By gaining administrative access system, the attackers would have had access to, not just the zone files, but also information entered by users such as their names, addresses, email addresses, and phone numbers.

“Although the passwords were stored as salted cryptographic hashes, we have deactivated all CZDS passwords as a precaution,” ICANN said. The alert recommended that users of CZDS take additional measures to protect other accounts for which they might have used the same passwords.

Dan Kaminsky, chief scientist at White Ops and one of only seven individuals with the authority to recover the Internet’s root DNS keys in an emergency, said the attackers are unlikely to have been able to do much with their access.

“The reality is there's many layers of protection here, because the root -- for all its importance -- is actually really quite small,” Kaminsky said via email. “The fundamental design of DNS works by putting the least data at the point of maximum centralization. Nothing got changed in this attack, as far as we're aware of."

Attacks like this highlight the continuing danger organizations face from spear-phishing campaigns that involve the use of highly targeted emails to deliver malware. Though decidedly low-tech in approach, spear-phishing emails have proved to be one of the most effective means of delivering malware on corporate systems in recent years.

Until relatively recently, more than nine out of ten attacks involving advanced persistent threats were initiated via a spear phishing campaign. Even the mega breach at Target began with the attackers using a phishing email to steal the login credentials of a third-party vendor, which they then used to gain a foothold on Target’s network.

While spear phishing remains a major threat, there are signs that hackers have begun moving to other delivery mechanisms of late. According to security vendor Symantec, the number of spear phishing attacks per day has kept coming down steadily over the past 12 months.

In October, the average was about 45 per day, the company said. Of the attachments used in such email-based attacks, the .doc attachment type comprised 62.5 percent and .exe attachments made up 14.4 percent,” the company noted.

The companies most frequently targeted in these attacks belonged to the finance, insurance, and real estate sectors. Companies in these industries received 28% of all spear phishing emails, followed by companies in the manufacturing sector, which received about 17%, Symantec noted.

Jai Vijayan is a seasoned technology reporter with over 20 years of experience in IT trade journalism. He was most recently a Senior Editor at Computerworld, where he covered information security and data privacy issues for the publication. Over the course of his 20-year ... View Full Bio

Comment  | 
Print  | 
More Insights
Comments
Newest First  |  Oldest First  |  Threaded View
News
Former CISA Director Chris Krebs Discusses Risk Management & Threat Intel
Kelly Sheridan, Staff Editor, Dark Reading,  2/23/2021
Edge-DRsplash-10-edge-articles
Security + Fraud Protection: Your One-Two Punch Against Cyberattacks
Joshua Goldfarb, Director of Product Management at F5,  2/23/2021
News
Cybercrime Groups More Prolific, Focus on Healthcare in 2020
Robert Lemos, Contributing Writer,  2/22/2021
Register for Dark Reading Newsletters
White Papers
Video
Cartoon Contest
Write a Caption, Win an Amazon Gift Card! Click Here
Latest Comment: "The truth behind Stonehenge...."
Current Issue
2021 Top Enterprise IT Trends
We've identified the key trends that are poised to impact the IT landscape in 2021. Find out why they're important and how they will affect you today!
Flash Poll
Building the SOC of the Future
Building the SOC of the Future
Digital transformation, cloud-focused attacks, and a worldwide pandemic. The past year has changed the way business works and the way security teams operate. There is no going back.
Twitter Feed
Dark Reading - Bug Report
Bug Report
Enterprise Vulnerabilities
From DHS/US-CERT's National Vulnerability Database
CVE-2021-27886
PUBLISHED: 2021-03-02
rakibtg Docker Dashboard before 2021-02-28 allows command injection in backend/utilities/terminal.js via shell metacharacters in the command parameter of an API request. NOTE: this is NOT a Docker, Inc. product.
CVE-2016-8153
PUBLISHED: 2021-03-02
** REJECT ** DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: The CNA or individual who requested this candidate did not associate it with any vulnerability during 2016. Notes: none.
CVE-2016-8154
PUBLISHED: 2021-03-02
** REJECT ** DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: The CNA or individual who requested this candidate did not associate it with any vulnerability during 2016. Notes: none.
CVE-2016-8155
PUBLISHED: 2021-03-02
** REJECT ** DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: The CNA or individual who requested this candidate did not associate it with any vulnerability during 2016. Notes: none.
CVE-2016-8156
PUBLISHED: 2021-03-02
** REJECT ** DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: The CNA or individual who requested this candidate did not associate it with any vulnerability during 2016. Notes: none.