Dark Reading is part of the Informa Tech Division of Informa PLC

This site is operated by a business or businesses owned by Informa PLC and all copyright resides with them.Informa PLC's registered office is 5 Howick Place, London SW1P 1WG. Registered in England and Wales. Number 8860726.

Perimeter

5/29/2019
02:30 PM
Robin Hicks
Robin Hicks
Commentary
Connect Directly
LinkedIn
RSS
E-Mail vvv
50%
50%

Don't Just Tune Your SIEM, Retune It

Your SIEM isn't a set-it-and-forget-it proposition. It's time for a spring cleaning.

Any system information and event management (SIEM) system will require a good deal of customization out of the box before the organization deploying it will see useful data. Once set up, though, the SIEM quickly becomes an invaluable tool in the engineer's toolbox for identifying risks, trends, malicious activity, and even simple misconfigurations. But how many organizations are treating the SIEM as a static solution and simply "setting and forgetting"?

The reality is that our environments are constantly evolving: data types, endpoints, subnets, compliance requirements, technology and business risk, and other variables we draw upon when we set up the SIEM initially are all dynamic. Of course, in larger organizations there are likely to be teams dedicated to maintaining the SIEM that remain aware of these changes and adjust as necessary. But in smaller organizations, we tend to get bogged down in day-to-day activities that prevent us from capturing all these changes. After all, the shortage of cybersecurity staff is well known and shows no sign of easing. Over time, alerts become stale and incomplete if these changes are neglected, eventually leading to the infamous alert fatigue.

If you find yourself in the latter category, consider treating your SIEM updates like a spring cleaning exercise this year — one or two long days dedicated to reviewing all your alerts, rules, variables, and other criteria in the SIEM to see what is still relevant and what's not, what's changed, and consider some of the following items:

  • Have any application updates for the SIEM been released but not applied? Hopefully not, but take this opportunity to confirm and patch your system to the most current, stable release.
  • Has the network team stood up any new subnets or equipment, such as DMZ environments, to or from which traffic should be monitored?
  • Has the systems team deployed new servers whose logs should be monitored?
  • Have your developers released any new applications that should be incorporated?
  • Have your endpoints started using any new software (operating systems or productivity applications) that should be monitored?
  • Have any applications or services moved to new servers and/or subnets?
  • Have any new special access privileges been introduced (vendors and contractors, for example)?
  • Have any new users been granted elevated privileges?
  • If your organization uses file integrity monitoring or user and entity behavior analytics, is this configured across all nodes where necessary and is it monitoring all the right metrics?

Before moving on, consider one more often-overlooked value: Has the business's risk appetite toward any of the above items changed? What was considered low risk a year ago may be a high risk today or vice versa. Having a good grasp on what is important to the business will pay dividends toward knowing what is critical and what is not — and keep in mind that what is critical to us as security professionals may not always seem critical to the business.

In the interest of being thorough, approach the review as an out-of-the-box setup. Don't assume a rule or alert's configuration is still valid because you remember setting it up and don't think anything needs to be changed. That's the equivalent of not vacuuming under the couch because nothing should be under there, but moving the couch usually disproves this theory.

Just as you would approach spring cleaning your home, overturn the dusty items and look in all the dark corners for anything that could be working better. Engage your SIEM vendor if you can — most will offer a periodic review with your account manager to look over your shoulder and offer guidance on what you may be doing right or wrong, what you could be doing better, and any useful tips or tricks they've seen.

This should not be an evaluation of what else to add to your plate but an opportunity to ensure the information you are receiving is timely, accurate, and relevant. In the end, you should be left with a squeaky-clean environment and a SIEM that behaves as well as it did on Day 1.

Related Content:

Robin Hicks has spent the last 10 years in various TechOps roles, with the last four dedicated to information security. He specializes in network security and secure network design, audit, and GRC. He holds an undergraduate degree in Information Technology with a Security ... View Full Bio
Comment  | 
Print  | 
More Insights
Comments
Newest First  |  Oldest First  |  Threaded View
AaronS926
50%
50%
AaronS926,
User Rank: Author
9/24/2019 | 12:34:28 PM
Consider Raising the Bar
This is solid guidance for those who have not yet integrated these activities into their ongoing SIEM management lifecycle. While an annual effort is certainly better than nothing, I would encourage readers to turn these activities into scheduled quarterly tasks.  Create a ticket, drop a recurring appointment in your calender - use whatever method works best for you, but challenge yourself to make SIEM maintenance part of "normal" operations.
Register for Dark Reading Newsletters
White Papers
Video
Cartoon Contest
Write a Caption, Win a Starbucks Card! Click Here
Latest Comment: Our Endpoint Protection system is a little outdated... 
Current Issue
The Year in Security: 2019
This Tech Digest provides a wrap up and overview of the year's top cybersecurity news stories. It was a year of new twists on old threats, with fears of another WannaCry-type worm and of a possible botnet army of Wi-Fi routers. But 2019 also underscored the risk of firmware and trusted security tools harboring dangerous holes that cybercriminals and nation-state hackers could readily abuse. Read more.
Flash Poll
Rethinking Enterprise Data Defense
Rethinking Enterprise Data Defense
Frustrated with recurring intrusions and breaches, cybersecurity professionals are questioning some of the industrys conventional wisdom. Heres a look at what theyre thinking about.
Twitter Feed
Dark Reading - Bug Report
Bug Report
Enterprise Vulnerabilities
From DHS/US-CERT's National Vulnerability Database
CVE-2019-16246
PUBLISHED: 2019-12-12
Intesync Solismed 3.3sp1 allows Local File Inclusion (LFI), a different vulnerability than CVE-2019-15931. This leads to unauthenticated code execution.
CVE-2019-17358
PUBLISHED: 2019-12-12
Cacti through 1.2.7 is affected by multiple instances of lib/functions.php unsafe deserialization of user-controlled data to populate arrays. An authenticated attacker could use this to influence object data values and control actions taken by Cacti or potentially cause memory corruption in the PHP ...
CVE-2019-17428
PUBLISHED: 2019-12-12
An issue was discovered in Intesync Solismed 3.3sp1. An flaw in the encryption implementation exists, allowing for all encrypted data stored within the database to be decrypted.
CVE-2019-18345
PUBLISHED: 2019-12-12
A reflected XSS issue was discovered in DAViCal through 1.1.8. It echoes the action parameter without encoding. If a user visits an attacker-supplied link, the attacker can view all data the attacked user can view, as well as perform all actions in the name of the user. If the user is an administrat...
CVE-2019-19198
PUBLISHED: 2019-12-12
The Scoutnet Kalender plugin 1.1.0 for WordPress allows XSS.