Perimeter

2/7/2019
10:00 AM
50%
50%

DDoS Mitigation Pioneer Launches Network Security Startup

Barrett Lyon is co-founder of Netography, which emerged today with $2.6M in seed funding from Andreessen Horowitz.

Netography, a new autonomous network security platform, today emerged with $2.6 million in seed funding from Andreessen Horowitz. The startup aims to leverage real-time data from network devices to help security and network teams automatically block malicious traffic.

Co-founders are DDoS mitigation pioneer Barrett Lyon as CEO and Dan Murphy as CTO. Lyon, known for his work in anti-DDoS and network security tech, has also founded Prolexic, acquired by Akamai; BitGravity, acquired by Tata Communications; XDN, acquired by Fortinet; and Defense.net, acquired by F5 Networks.

"No one understands networks, how they act, the information they provide, and how to protect them better than Barrett and his team," said Martin Casado, general partner at Andreessen Horowitz and software-defined network expert, in a statement on the news.

Netography's platform, to be released in the second quarter of 2019, collects data from enterprise network devices and applies cloud processing, software, and algorithms to identify and block threats that are normally difficult to detect. The idea of "capture everything" is in the past, said Lyon in a release. Netography aims to remotely solve problems that first-generation network traffic analyzers, DLP, and SIEM tools have struggled to address in the past.

Read more details here.

Dark Reading's Quick Hits delivers a brief synopsis and summary of the significance of breaking news events. For more information from the original source of the news item, please follow the link provided in this article. View Full Bio

Comment  | 
Print  | 
More Insights
Comments
Newest First  |  Oldest First  |  Threaded View
RyanSepe
50%
50%
RyanSepe,
User Rank: Ninja
2/7/2019 | 1:33:43 PM
The idea of "capture everything" is in the past
I am happy this assertion was made. There have been many times where I've heard the "lets do it all" methodology only to find that implementation is cumbersome, not scoped properly, and the current resources cannot facilitate the review of the approach.

It's nice to see that finally someone is living by this mantra. You should always calculate factors of what you are protecting (value and function), how you are protecting (mechansism), and does it make sense to protect with such measures. Otherwise, you are just throwing money at a problem to satisfy a checkbox instead of applying pragmatically.
Russia Hacked Clinton's Computers Five Hours After Trump's Call
Robert Lemos, Technology Journalist/Data Researcher,  4/19/2019
Why We Need a 'Cleaner Internet'
Darren Anstee, Chief Technology Officer at Arbor Networks,  4/19/2019
55% of SMBs Would Pay Up Post-Ransomware Attack
Dark Reading Staff 4/25/2019
Register for Dark Reading Newsletters
White Papers
Video
Cartoon
Current Issue
5 Emerging Cyber Threats to Watch for in 2019
Online attackers are constantly developing new, innovative ways to break into the enterprise. This Dark Reading Tech Digest gives an in-depth look at five emerging attack trends and exploits your security team should look out for, along with helpful recommendations on how you can prevent your organization from falling victim.
Flash Poll
Twitter Feed
Dark Reading - Bug Report
Bug Report
Enterprise Vulnerabilities
From DHS/US-CERT's National Vulnerability Database
CVE-2019-11538
PUBLISHED: 2019-04-26
In Pulse Secure Pulse Connect Secure version 9.0RX before 9.0R3.4, 8.3RX before 8.3R7.1, 8.2RX before 8.2R12.1, and 8.1RX before 8.1R15.1, an NFS problem could allow an authenticated attacker to access the contents of arbitrary files on the affected device.
CVE-2019-11539
PUBLISHED: 2019-04-26
In Pulse Secure Pulse Connect Secure version 9.0RX before 9.0R3.4, 8.3RX before 8.3R7.1, 8.2RX before 8.2R12.1, and 8.1RX before 8.1R15.1 and Pulse Policy Secure version 9.0RX before 9.0R3.2, 5.4RX before 5.4R7.1, 5.3RX before 5.3R12.1, 5.2RX before 5.2R12.1, and 5.1RX before 5.1R15.1, the admin web...
CVE-2019-11540
PUBLISHED: 2019-04-26
In Pulse Secure Pulse Connect Secure version 9.0RX before 9.0R3.4 and 8.3RX before 8.3R7.1 and Pulse Policy Secure version 9.0RX before 9.0R3.2 and 5.4RX before 5.4R7.1, an unauthenticated, remote attacker can conduct a session hijacking attack.
CVE-2019-11541
PUBLISHED: 2019-04-26
In Pulse Secure Pulse Connect Secure version 9.0RX before 9.0R3.4, 8.3RX before 8.3R7.1, and 8.2RX before 8.2R12.1, users using SAML authentication with the Reuse Existing NC (Pulse) Session option may see authentication leaks.
CVE-2019-11542
PUBLISHED: 2019-04-26
In Pulse Secure Pulse Connect Secure version 9.0RX before 9.0R3.4, 8.3RX before 8.3R7.1, 8.2RX before 8.2R12.1, and 8.1RX before 8.1R15.1 and Pulse Policy Secure version 9.0RX before 9.0R3.2, 5.4RX before 5.4R7.1, 5.3RX before 5.3R12.1, 5.2RX before 5.2R12.1, and 5.1RX before 5.1R15.1, an authentica...