Dark Reading is part of the Informa Tech Division of Informa PLC

This site is operated by a business or businesses owned by Informa PLC and all copyright resides with them.Informa PLC's registered office is 5 Howick Place, London SW1P 1WG. Registered in England and Wales. Number 8860726.

Partner Perspectives  Connecting marketers to our tech communities.
SPONSORED BY
2/20/2018
09:00 AM
Laurence Pitt
Laurence Pitt
Partner Perspectives
Connect Directly
Twitter
RSS
50%
50%

Proactive Threat Hunting: Taking the Fight to the Enemy

Pulling together everything your security team needs to be effective at threat hunting is not easy but it's definitely worthwhile. Here's why.

If you haven't implemented a cyber threat hunting capability yet, 2018 is the time to start. Anyone who has paid attention to recent data breaches will know that attackers have become dangerously good at breaking into and hiding on enterprise networks for long periods of time. Often organizations do not realize they have been breached for months, and in some cases years, after an initial intrusion and even then only when informed of it by a third-party.

Security strategies solely focused on blocking attacks at the perimeter and responding to incidents after they have occurred are no longer enough for dealing with targeted, stealthy and persistent attackers. You also need measures for proactively hunting down and neutralizing threats on your network before they materialize.

With threat hunting, your incident response team is going out and engaging with the enemy, rather than passively waiting for them to show their hand. As the SANS Institute describes it, "threat hunting is a focused and iterative approach to searching out, identifying and understanding adversaries that have entered the defender’s networks." 

It involves the use of external threat intelligence, internal telemetry and other data to uncover adversaries who have the intent, the ability, and the opportunity to do harm. If implemented correctly, a threat hunting capability can reduce attacker dwell time on your network, and also your exposure to new risks.

Threat hunting requires a very different mindset from one that is focused primarily on reacting to security incidents and alerts. It's main objective is finding the hidden human adversary on your network rather than just their tools and malware. It requires you to think like the adversary and to know what systems and data on your network an attacker will most likely target so you can start protecting those assets first.

A good incident response team is vital to threat hunting;unless you can quickly mitigate and recover from the threats you find, there's not a whole lot that can be gained from going out and finding them in the first place. This is particularly true as your threat hunting team's capabilities mature. Just as the hunters get quicker and better at finding new threats, your IR team needs to be able to prioritize and respond to the identified threats equally effectively.

To be effective at hunting, security teams also need access to a lot of internal and external telemetry and threat intelligence. For example, to find a hidden adversary, you need to know what to look for, where and when. Often, that task requires correlating data from multiple sources, which in turn requires a high degree of automation. You need tools for automatically collecting and aggregating data from multiple sources and for quickly cross-referencing and analyzing the data.

Having trained analysts with a diverse range of skills on your team is another necessity. Those include  security operations skills, incident response, forensics, and malware analysis.

Clearly, pulling together everything you need to be effective at threat hunting is not easy but it's definitely worthwhile.  Many forward-looking organizations have already adopted threat-hunting practices and more are following suit daily. In an April 2017 SANS Institute survey, 27% of the 306 enterprises that participated had a defined threat-hunting program in place and were following it. Another 45% engaged in threat hunting even if it was only on an ad hoc basis and without any formal processes. Organizations that achieved measurable improvements in security as the result of threat hunting, most often cited speed and accuracy as their biggest gain.

Hunting is about taking a proactive approach to dealing with threats on your network. Make adoption of at least some of its approaches a priority this year.

To learn more about linking security intelligence to policy enforcement to defend against advanced threats click here.

Laurence Pitt is the Strategic Director for Security with Juniper Networks' marketing organization in EMEA. He has over twenty years' experience of cyber security, having started out in systems design and moved through product management in areas from endpoint security to ... View Full Bio
Comment  | 
Print  | 
More Insights
Comments
Threaded  |  Newest First  |  Oldest First
Edge-DRsplash-10-edge-articles
7 Old IT Things Every New InfoSec Pro Should Know
Joan Goodchild, Staff Editor,  4/20/2021
News
Cloud-Native Businesses Struggle With Security
Robert Lemos, Contributing Writer,  5/6/2021
Commentary
Defending Against Web Scraping Attacks
Rob Simon, Principal Security Consultant at TrustedSec,  5/7/2021
Register for Dark Reading Newsletters
White Papers
Video
Cartoon
Current Issue
2021 Top Enterprise IT Trends
We've identified the key trends that are poised to impact the IT landscape in 2021. Find out why they're important and how they will affect you today!
Flash Poll
Twitter Feed
Dark Reading - Bug Report
Bug Report
Enterprise Vulnerabilities
From DHS/US-CERT's National Vulnerability Database
CVE-2020-36289
PUBLISHED: 2021-05-12
Affected versions of Atlassian Jira Server and Data Center allow an unauthenticated user to enumerate users via an Information Disclosure vulnerability in the QueryComponentRendererValue!Default.jspa endpoint. The affected versions are before version 8.5.13, from version 8.6.0 before 8.13.5, and fro...
CVE-2021-32606
PUBLISHED: 2021-05-11
In the Linux kernel 5.11 through 5.12.2, isotp_setsockopt in net/can/isotp.c allows privilege escalation to root by leveraging a use-after-free. (This does not affect earlier versions that lack CAN ISOTP SF_BROADCAST support.)
CVE-2021-3504
PUBLISHED: 2021-05-11
A flaw was found in the hivex library in versions before 1.3.20. It is caused due to a lack of bounds check within the hivex_open function. An attacker could input a specially crafted Windows Registry (hive) file which would cause hivex to read memory beyond its normal bounds or cause the program to...
CVE-2021-20309
PUBLISHED: 2021-05-11
A flaw was found in ImageMagick in versions before 7.0.11 and before 6.9.12, where a division by zero in WaveImage() of MagickCore/visual-effects.c may trigger undefined behavior via a crafted image file submitted to an application using ImageMagick. The highest threat from this vulnerability is to ...
CVE-2021-20310
PUBLISHED: 2021-05-11
A flaw was found in ImageMagick in versions before 7.0.11, where a division by zero ConvertXYZToJzazbz() of MagickCore/colorspace.c may trigger undefined behavior via a crafted image file that is submitted by an attacker and processed by an application using ImageMagick. The highest threat from this...