Dark Reading is part of the Informa Tech Division of Informa PLC

This site is operated by a business or businesses owned by Informa PLC and all copyright resides with them.Informa PLC's registered office is 5 Howick Place, London SW1P 1WG. Registered in England and Wales. Number 8860726.

Partner Perspectives  Connecting marketers to our tech communities.
6/4/2015
03:15 PM
Raja Patel
Raja Patel
Partner Perspectives
50%
50%

Securing Private and Hybrid Clouds

As-a-service models offer huge opportunities, but also complicate security.

Sometimes the easiest way to migrate to a new architectural modelis to let others do the work, others who are experts in their field. This has given rise to many as-a-service models throughout the industry and across the entire technology stack, from software to infrastructure. While this has unlocked huge opportunities to accelerate the deployment of new capabilities or increase economic efficiencies within an organization, it has complicated and even compromised security.

Let’s take a closer look at this trend and the implications. A private cloud is nothing more than the virtualized components of a traditional data center, making it easier to provision, operate, and manage resources more efficiently. Hybrid clouds leverage larger scale public cloud environments to drive further efficiencies. Containers take this a step further, delivering greater micro-segmentation and isolation capabilities with much faster boot times.

In this new reality, the traditional perimeter security model is insufficient. How do you define a perimeter in an environment where any device goes through many networks to many services, both inside and outside the business, or many containers are operating in a single machine?

Security in this any-to-any world must become more dynamic. This means creating an abstract of security functions, like a hypervisor does for operating functions. Security becomes a shared virtual service, applied to workloads and flows instead of machines and physical networks.  Automated controls deploy security instances according to policy, reducing the cost and time of deploying new applications or services and taking advantage of the value proposition of virtualization and private/hybrid clouds. Hardware-level security functions help boost performance of the virtual environments while restricting opportunities for leaks. Like software, storage, and other parts of the stack before it, security becomes virtualized, with the same benefits and characteristics.   

A Partnered Approach

This new approach to securing enterprise clouds is based on virtual isolation and micro-segmentation. By partnering with the leading virtualization companies, security vendors make sure that each workload deploys dynamically and automatically with virtual sensors that observe and report to the security manager, significantly increasing visibility and control over the virtual environment. Virtual perimeters surround each workload, separating them from each other and from the escalated privileges of the hypervisor. Security policies are linked to the workload, so if a virtual machine or container moves, suspends, or restarts, its policies stay with it. Workloads with different security levels are isolated whether they are on the same physical server or in different data centers, in a virtual machine or a container, reducing the risk of attacks based on privilege escalation or vulnerabilities in the hypervisor.

Security, of course, needs more than just perimeter defenses. The virtual security controller steers traffic to security engines for intrusion detection and prevention, deep file analysis and file reputation management, behavioral analysis, advanced threat defense, and bot detection as needed. Scaling security capacity simply means increasing the number or capacity of these security engines, reducing potential bottlenecks.

One key advantage to this cloud security model is that it applies between layers as well as between workloads. Whether data is flowing in and out of a data-center (north-south), from server to user, or within a data center (east-west) from server to server, it is protected and evaluated by the network gateway, data loss prevention, and other components as defined in your policies.

Consistent policies, protections, and enforcement across your virtual infrastructure are now a reality, as the agility, ubiquity, and efficiency of software-defined security joins the rest of the software-defined infrastructure. This is true cloud security.

Raja Patel is vice president in the Intel Security Group and general manager of the Network Security business unit at Intel Corporation. He is responsible for defining and executing the strategic direction for Intel Security's Network Security business, which includes network ... View Full Bio
Comment  | 
Print  | 
More Insights
Comments
Newest First  |  Oldest First  |  Threaded View
COVID-19: Latest Security News & Commentary
Dark Reading Staff 8/3/2020
'BootHole' Vulnerability Exposes Secure Boot Devices to Attack
Kelly Sheridan, Staff Editor, Dark Reading,  7/29/2020
Out-of-Date and Unsupported Cloud Workloads Continue as a Common Weakness
Robert Lemos, Contributing Writer,  7/28/2020
Register for Dark Reading Newsletters
White Papers
Video
Cartoon Contest
Current Issue
Special Report: Computing's New Normal, a Dark Reading Perspective
This special report examines how IT security organizations have adapted to the "new normal" of computing and what the long-term effects will be. Read it and get a unique set of perspectives on issues ranging from new threats & vulnerabilities as a result of remote working to how enterprise security strategy will be affected long term.
Flash Poll
Twitter Feed
Dark Reading - Bug Report
Bug Report
Enterprise Vulnerabilities
From DHS/US-CERT's National Vulnerability Database
CVE-2020-4560
PUBLISHED: 2020-08-03
IBM Financial Transaction Manager 3.2.4 is vulnerable to cross-site scripting. This vulnerability allows users to embed arbitrary JavaScript code in the Web UI thus altering the intended functionality potentially leading to credentials disclosure within a trusted session.
CVE-2019-4589
PUBLISHED: 2020-08-03
IBM Cognos Analytics 11.0 and 11.1 is vulnerable to privlege escalation where the "My schedules and subscriptions" page is visible and accessible to a less privileged user. IBM X-Force ID: 167449.
CVE-2020-4328
PUBLISHED: 2020-08-03
IBM Financial Transaction Manager 3.2.4 is vulnerable to SQL injection. A remote attacker could send specially-crafted SQL statements, which could allow the attacker to view, add, modify or delete information in the back-end database. IBM X-Force ID: 177839.
CVE-2020-4377
PUBLISHED: 2020-08-03
IBM Cognos Anaytics 11.0 and 11.1 is vulnerable to an XML External Entity Injection (XXE) attack when processing XML data. A remote attacker could exploit this vulnerability to expose sensitive information or consume memory resources. IBM X-Force ID: 179156.
CVE-2020-4534
PUBLISHED: 2020-08-03
IBM WebSphere Application Server 7.0, 8.0, 8.5, and 9.0 could allow a local authenticated attacker to gain elevated privileges on the system, caused by improper handling of UNC paths. By scheduling a task with a specially-crafted UNC path, an attacker could exploit this vulnerability to execute arbi...